bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Noetscher, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Noetscher, G..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Low Intensity Multi-Channel Steering TMS Array for Network Level Neuromodulation

Objective: Low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (LI-TMS) is being investigated as a gel-free alternative to transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), but existing systems remain almost exclusively single-channel and cannot electronically steer the induced electric field. We present the design, modeling, and experimental measurement of a wearable whole-head, multichannel, steerable LI-TMS array. Methods: The system comprises a 102-channel conformal coil array with independently controlled drivers capable of arbitrary waveform synthesis, together with a boundary element fast multipole method (BEM-FMM) framework that computes the coil currents required to produce prescribed cortical field patterns. A 12-channel prototype was characterized by coil-current, electric-field, and thermal measurements. Results: The prototype produced a peak primary electric field of approximately 1 V/m measured in air 4 cm from the inner helmet surface. Whole-array modeling attained cortical fields of up to 1.5 V/m, reproduced the field distribution of a clinically validated low-intensity stimulator to within 3%-5%, and demonstrated focal targeting of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, simultaneous delivery of electric field to the default mode network nodes, and synthesis of electric fields following the traveling alpha wave. Conclusion: Electronically steerable, whole-head LI-TMS is feasible using accessible microprocessor-controlled power electronics. Significance: The array reaches the cortical field regime of tES without scalp contact or the associated shunting of current through the scalp, offering a route to testing network-level, phaselocked weak-field neuromodulation.

bioengineering↗

Direct Reconstruction of DC Cortical Conductivity from Large-Scale Electron Microscopy Data

Electrical conductivity of cortical gray matter governs the magnitude and spatial distribution of electric fields generated by brain stimulation and intrinsic neuronal activity measured with M/EEG and intracortical recordings. However, reported macroscopic conductivity values vary by more than threefold, limiting the fidelity of bioelectromagnetic models and leaving unresolved whether this variability reflects measurement uncertainty or genuine structural heterogeneity of cortical tissue. Here, we present a multiscale computational framework that, for the first time, attempts to derive mesoscale conductivity maps of mouse visual cortex at 50-{micro}m resolution directly from large-volume, segmented nanometer-scale electron microscopy data. The Minnie 65 subvolume of the MICrONS dataset is accurately subdivided into 1,224 50-{micro}m cubic blocks. Each block contains, on average, 40-50 million membrane facets of a highly convoluted and dense cellular structure. Three orthogonal electrode pairs are applied to each isolated block to estimate the three principal components of the conductivity tensor. Quasistatic electric modeling is enabled by an iterative boundary-element fast multipole method (BEM-FMM) under the approximation of non-conducting membranes (DC conductivity). Spatially averaged conductivity values predicted by our framework agree well with prior low-resolution measurements in rats, validating the approach. At the same time, the resulting mesoscale maps reveal pronounced conductivity granularity at 50-100 {micro}m scales as well as significant variations in both radial and tangential directions. These results indicate that mesoscale conductivity heterogeneity could be an intrinsic structural property of the cortex. Limitations and extensions of this study are discussed in detail.

neuroscience↗

Charge Based Boundary Element Method with Residual Driven Adaptive Mesh Refinement for High Resolution Electrical Simulation Modeling

Accurate transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and electroencephalography (EEG) forward modeling requires resolving numerical singularities in the charge density near electrodes and tissue interfaces. We present an adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) strategy for the charge based boundary element method (BEM) accelerated by the fast multiple method (BEM-FMM) including electrode and interface singularities. We derive a new error estimator which considers both local and nonlocal contributions of the single-layer potential operator and construct a refinement criterion based on the difference in charge solution across AMR iterations. We evaluate this approach on a 5-layer sphere model and on multiple subject-specific head models derived from the 7-tissue SimNIBS (headreco) and 40-tissue Sim4Life (head40) segmentations, using both voltage-controlled and current-controlled electrode formulations. Through convergence analysis on the white matter and deep hippocampal targets, we find electric fields with relative residual errors below 0.1% and 1% for SimNIBS and Sim4Life models, respectively. Our results indicate that the residual based AMR applied to BEM-FMM leads to numerically stable TES and EEG forward solutions in realistic head models.

neuroscience↗

Are Synaptic Clefts Directionally Oriented?

Synapses are fundamental building blocks of cortical circuits, yet their geometry is typically regarded as a local property, independent of mesoscale architecture. The prevailing assumption is that synaptic clefts are isotropically oriented in space. Here, we test this assumption by analyzing approximately 117 million synaptic clefts from two independent 1 mm3 electron microscopy datasets: the human H01 middle temporal gyrus and the mouse MICrONS primary visual cortex, using three independent cleft-extraction methods. Across both volumes, we observe that synaptic cleft orientations are not randomly distributed, but instead show statistically significant and spatially coherent directional biases across cortical layers. This mesoscale anisotropy is conserved across species, yet is stronger and more consistent in human association cortex than in mouse sensory cortex, a difference that may reflect the expanded dendritic arbors and greater integrative demands of human pyramidal neurons. We propose that cleft orientation bias is a geometric consequence of the axonal and dendritic architecture that shapes synapse formation, representing a new candidate organizational feature of cortical microarchitecture with potential implications for circuit computation and neuromodulation. These findings motivate targeted physiological studies to determine whether synaptic orientation contributes causally to cortical function.

neuroscience↗

Construction of Accurate Turtle Cerebellum Models and their use in Simulating Neuromodulation using the BEM-FMM

Digital representations of Purkinje cells from turtle cerebellum, which have long been to study cellular transmission dynamics and neuroplasticity, are necessary to conduct simulations of neuromodulation methods, including Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS). Methods: Data collected using microCT with 0.6 um isometric resolution are processed, segmented, and arranged to enable high resolution simulation via the Boundary Element Fast Multipole Method. Results: Fully computer aided design compatible, manifold triangular surface meshes were generated from microCT data and used to simulate cellular electromagnetic response to TMS. Conclusion: Accurate Purkinje cells may be readily generated and manipulated to create representative models of turtle cerebellum. Significance: The techniques employed herein may be used to generate accurate surface mesh of Purkinje cells which can enable computational electromagnetics code verification and serve as the basis for skeletal models used for bidomain biophysical simulations in tools such as NEURON to study neurostimulation dynamics and neuromodulation.

neuroscience↗

Fast and Accurate EEG/MEG BEM-Based Forward Problem Solution for High-Resolution Head Models

A BEM (boundary element method) based approach is developed to accurately solve an EEG/MEG forward problem for a modern high-resolution head model in approximately 60 seconds using a common workstation. The method utilizes a charge-based BEM with fast multipole acceleration (BEM-FMM) and a "smart" mesh pre-refinement (called b-refinement) close to the singular source(s). No costly matrix-filling or direct solution steps typical for the standard BEM are required; the method generates on-skin voltages as well as MEG magnetic fields for high-resolution head models in approximately 60 seconds after initial model assembly. The method is verified both theoretically and experimentally.

neuroscience↗

Accuracy of dipole source reconstruction in the 3-layerBEM model against the 5-layer BEM-FMM model

ObjectiveTo compare cortical dipole fitting spatial accuracy between the widely used yet highly simplified 3-layer and modern more realistic 5-layer BEM-FMM models with and without adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) methods. MethodsWe generate simulated noiseless 256-channel EEG data from 5-layer (7-compartment) meshes of 15 subjects from the Connectome Young Adult dataset. For each subject, we test four dipole positions, three sets of conductivity values, and two types of head segmentation. We use the boundary element method (BEM) with fast multipole method (FMM) acceleration, with or without (AMR), for forward modeling. Dipole fitting is carried out with the FieldTrip MATLAB toolbox. ResultsThe average position error (across all tested dipoles, subjects, and models) is [~]4 mm, with a standard deviation of [~]2 mm. The orientation error is [~]20{degrees} on average, with a standard deviation of [~]15{degrees}. Without AMR, the numerical inaccuracies produce a larger disagreement between the 3- and 5-layer models, with an average position error of [~]8 mm (6 mm standard deviation), and an orientation error of 28{degrees} (28{degrees} standard deviation). ConclusionsThe low-resolution 3-layer models provide excellent accuracy in dipole localization. On the other hand, dipole orientation is retrieved less accurately. Therefore, certain applications may require more realistic models for practical source reconstruction. AMR is a critical component for improving the accuracy of forward EEG computations using a high-resolution 5-layer volume conduction model. SignificanceImproving EEG source reconstruction accuracy is important for several clinical applications, including epilepsy and other seizure-inducing conditions.

bioinformatics↗

Solving High-Resolution Forward Problems for Extra- and Intracranial Neurophysiological Recordings Using Boundary Element Fast Multipole Method

We present a general numerical approach for solving the forward problem in high-resolution. This approach can be employed in the analysis of noninvasive electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) as well as invasive electrocorticography (ECoG), stereoencephalography (sEEG), and local field potential (LFP) recordings. The underlying algorithm is our recently developed boundary element fast multipole method (BEM-FMM) that simulates anatomically realistic head models with unprecedented numerical accuracy and speed. This is achieved by utilizing the adjoint double layer formulation and zeroth-order basis functions in conjunction with the FMM acceleration. We present the mathematical formalism in detail and validate the method by applying it to the canonical multilayer sphere problem. The numerical error of BEM-FMM is 2-10 times lower while the computational speed is 1.5-20 times faster than those of the standard first-order FEM. We present four practical case studies: (i) evaluation of the effect of a detailed head model on the accuracy of EEG/MEG forward solution; (ii) demonstration of the ability to accurately calculate the electric potential and the magnetic field in the immediate vicinity of the sources and conductivity boundaries; (iii) computation of the field of a spatially extended cortical equivalent dipole layer; and (iv) taking into account the effect a fontanel for infant EEG source modeling and comparison of the results with a commercially available FEM. In all cases, BEM-FMM provided versatile, fast, and accurate high-resolution modeling of the electromagnetic field and has the potential of becoming a standard tool for modeling both extracranial and intracranial electrophysiological signals.

neuroscience↗