Niziolek, C. A. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2023

Pars opercularis underlies efferent predictions and successful auditory feedback processing in speech: Evidence from left-hemisphere stroke

Hearing ones own speech allows for acoustic self-monitoring in real time. Left-hemisphere motor planning regions are thought to give rise to efferent predictions that can be compared to true feedback in sensory cortices, resulting in neural suppression commensurate with the degree of overlap between predicted and actual sensations. Sensory prediction errors thus serve as a possible mechanism of detection of deviant speech sounds, which can then feed back into corrective action, allowing for online control of speech acoustics. The goal of this study was to assess the integrity of this detection-correction circuit in persons with aphasia (PWA) whose left-hemisphere lesions may limit their ability to control variability in speech output. We recorded magnetoencephalography (MEG) while 15 PWA and age-matched controls spoke monosyllabic words and listened to playback of their utterances. From this, we measured speaking-induced suppression of the M100 neural response and related it to lesion profiles and speech behavior. Both speaking-induced suppression and cortical sensitivity to deviance were preserved at the group level in PWA. PWA with more spared tissue in pars opercularis had greater left-hemisphere neural suppression and greater behavioral correction of acoustically deviant pronunciations, whereas sparing of superior temporal gyrus was not related to neural suppression or acoustic behavior. In turn, PWA who made greater corrections had fewer overt speech errors in the MEG task. Thus, the motor planning regions that generate the efferent prediction are integral to performing corrections when that prediction is violated.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

A single exposure to altered auditory feedback causes observable sensorimotor adaptation in speech

Sensory errors caused by perturbations to movement-related feedback induce two types of behavioral changes that oppose the perturbation: rapid compensation within a movement, as well as longer-term adaptation of subsequent movements. Although adaptation is hypothesized to occur whenever a sensory error is perceived (including after a single exposure to altered feedback), adaptation of articulatory movements in speech has only been observed after repetitive exposure to auditory perturbations, questioning both current theories of speech sensorimotor adaptation as well as the universality of more general theories of adaptation. Thus, positive evidence for the hypothesized single-exposure or "one-shot" learning would provide critical support for current theories of speech sensorimotor learning and control and align adaptation in speech more closely with other motor domains. We measured one-shot learning in a large dataset in which participants were exposed to intermittent, unpredictable auditory perturbations to their vowel formants (the resonant frequencies of the vocal tract that distinguish between different vowels). On each trial, participants spoke a word out loud while their first formant was shifted up, shifted down, or remained unshifted. We examined whether the perturbation on a given trial affected speech on the subsequent, unperturbed trial. We found that participants adjusted their first formant in the opposite direction of the preceding shift, demonstrating that learning occurs even after a single auditory perturbation as predicted by current theories of sensorimotor adaptation. While adaptation and the preceding compensation responses were correlated, this was largely due to differences across individuals rather than within-participant variation from trial to trial. These findings are more consistent with theories that hypothesize adaptation is driven directly by updates to internal control models than those that suggest adaptation results from incorporation of feedback responses from previous productions.

neuroscience↗