bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Niyogi, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Niyogi, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Understanding Strategic Motor Learning as a Process of Hypothesis Testing

Multiple learning processes contribute to successful goal-directed actions under changing physiological states, biomechanical constraints, and environmental contexts. Among these, explicit strategies enable us to discover new movement patterns when existing ones no longer achieve the desired outcome. Yet, how strategies are discovered during motor learning remains unknown. To address this, we developed a novel behavioral paradigm that isolates strategy discovery in response to a range of visuomotor perturbations. This approach revealed that strategy discovery unfolds through an initial period of systematic exploration across multiple candidate strategies, followed by an 'aha' moment in which behavior converges on a stable solution. To account for these dynamics, we developed a computational model based on hypothesis testing in which learners generate and evaluate visuomotor rules to counteract the perturbation. This hypothesis testing model outperformed a range of alternative accounts, including gradual error reduction, win-stay lose-shift learning, and sudden one-shot insight. Together, these findings identify hypothesis testing as a computational mechanism by which humans discover new strategies during motor learning.

neuroscience↗

Hypothesis Testing Governs an Efficiency-Flexibility Trade-off in Strategic Motor Learning

It remains unknown how people discover an effective movement strategy when the environment changes (e.g., when adapting to a new computer trackpad). We propose that strategic adaptation operates through hypothesis testing: learners generate candidate hypotheses, discard those inconsistent with feedback, and iteratively refine their actions through practice. A core prediction of this account is an efficiency-flexibility trade-off. In constrained environments, where few hypotheses are viable, learning slows as people eliminate competing hypotheses but supports broader generalization. In unconstrained environments, where many hypotheses are viable, learning accelerates as learners adopt one of many expedient hypotheses but yields poorer generalization. In two reaching experiments (N = 560), we varied the arrangement of target positions to manipulate how tightly the hypothesis space was constrained. As predicted, the constrained group learned more slowly but generalized more--an efficiency- flexibility trade-off that highlights hypothesis testing as a novel process governing human motor learning.

neuroscience↗