bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Nisthar, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Nisthar, D..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

What we miss shapes what we protect: sea turtles as a case study of grey literature and language bias in an evidence synthesis

Evidence-based approaches are increasingly advocated and applied in conservation to provide reliable recommendations for management and policymaking. Although substantial efforts have been undertaken to generate ecological knowledge across languages and publication types, many syntheses and meta-analyses fail to include relevant literature sources; drawing into question their reliability. To assess the extent of biases resulting from ignoring grey literature and non-English publications, we reviewed and synthesised movement and migratory connectivity data for green turtles across Southeast Asia from multiple literature types and eight languages. We identified substantial losses in connectivity information, with at least half of all locations losing more than 88% of their connections, and shifts in demographic representation and sampling techniques when grey literature was excluded from the evidence base. The exclusion of non-English literature had a comparatively smaller impact. The regional connectivity network generated through this study highlights the need for holistic reviews to develop evidence bases to underpin transboundary management of migratory species. Ignoring grey literature and, potentially, regional languages in the development may lead to misallocation of limited management resources. Holistic reviews can further support the establishment of Important Areas for migratory species and inform how we meet and report on global biodiversity commitments.

ecology↗

Integrating migratory marine connectivity into shark conservation

Understanding migratory connectivity is important for the conservation of highly mobile marine species that face escalating threats across the globe. Establishing baseline information on migratory connectivity is therefore needed to identify regions of conservation focus. Despite efforts to track migratory sharks and rays, information on transboundary movements is limited and often inaccessible to managers and policymakers. Here, we synthesised multimethod movement data for migratory Australian shark and ray species, investigating which species require international engagement to support their population recovery. Based on data from a systematic literature review, we built connectivity networks from telemetry and mark-recapture studies that provide a first baseline for transboundary migratory connectivity for Australian sharks and rays. Of the 31 shark and ray species reviewed, we identified 6 species that link the Australian Exclusive Economic Zone to other national jurisdictions via multispecies migratory connections through the Tasman Sea to New Zealand, through the Tasman and Coral Sea to New Caledonia, and north across the Timor Sea and Torres Strait to Indonesia and Papua New Guinea. White sharks (Carcharhinus carcharias) and whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) were the most data rich, whereas 14 shark and ray species had no movement information. There is a grave deficiency in available information for endangered or critically endangered migratory shark and ray populations, with 76% having only one or no published studies. This work supports future conservation strategies for migratory sharks that require robust international collaboration and the adoption of integrated and dynamic management approaches.

ecology↗

Ecological insights and management implications of the global migratory connectivity of green turtles

AimGreen turtles are a widely distributed and highly migratory species, despite extensive data on the movement of green turtles, there is no global synthesis on the subject, limiting a holistic understanding of their movement. Based on three decades of published literature, we present the first global model of migratory connectivity for green turtles. LocationGlobal. Time Period1990-2022. Major Taxa StudiedGreen Sea Turtle (Chelonia mydas) MethodsWe conducted a structured literature review extracting georeferenced information on the movement of green turtles from 1990 to 2022, aggregating this information into a single connectivity model, defining sites and "metasites" as nodes of connectivity. We then evaluate the connectivity routes from nesting areas to foraging sites for each RMU, identifying those trajectories moving outside and across the boundaries of these areas. ResultsWe found an increasing number of studies assessing movement of green turtles, with a total of 113 sources of migratory connectivity information. We identified 474 sites, representing locations where green turtles were observed (124 of these being nesting sites). Migratory connections from nesting sites ranged from resident turtles never leaving the area, to rookeries linked to 13 different sites, some over 5,000 km apart. This long-distance connectivity exposes populations to threats across disparate locations. Most connections traversed national jurisdictions, including crossing different Regional Management Units Main ConclusionsWe compiled the largest available dataset describing movement of green turtles worldwide and present the first global model of their migratory connectivity. This model provides ecological insights into regional differences in life histories, identifies geographic and demographic gaps in sampling, and provides baseline information on connectivity to support transboundary management of green turtle populations. The study highlights the need for larger collaborative efforts to aggregate knowledge beyond local jurisdictions, to inform and align effective management measures to protect this threatened species.

ecology↗