bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Niida, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Niida, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Common neural representation between visual perception and imagery in eidetikers

Eidetic imagery is experienced as "seen" in external space, unlike typical visual mental imagery, which occurs in the minds eye. To investigate whether eidetic imagery and perception share common neural substrates, we measured brain activity in eidetikers and typical imagers using fMRI while they performed perception and imagery tasks. Multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) revealed that imagined objects could be classified based on perceptual activation patterns in right BA19 for eidetikers, but not for typical imagers. This effect was specific to BA19 and was not observed in early visual areas (BA17/18). Subjective ratings confirmed that eidetikers experienced images as percept-like. These findings provide neural evidence for percept-like mental imagery and show that individual differences in subjective experience are reflected in the high-level visual cortex. Significance StatementHow does the brain support individual differences in subjective visual experience? Visual mental imagery partially shares neural substrates with perception, but how this shared activity relates to subjective conscious experience remains unclear. Some individuals, known as eidetikers, report images that are literally seen and percept-like, providing a unique opportunity to investigate the neural basis of individual variation. Using fMRI and multivariate pattern analysis, we show that in eidetikers, the neural representations of imagined objects are more strongly shared with perceptual representations in a higher-level visual area (BA19) than in typical imagers. These findings provide neural evidence for eidetic imagery and reveal how individual differences in subjective experience are reflected in the organization of visual representations in the human brain.

neuroscience↗

Neural substrates of top-down processing during perceptual duration-based timing and beat-based timing

Temporal context is a crucial factor in timing. Previous studies have revealed that the timing of regular stimuli, such as isochronous beats or rhythmic sequences (termed beat-based timing), activated the basal ganglia, whereas the timing of single intervals or irregular stimuli (termed duration-based timing) activated the cerebellum. We conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment to determine whether top-down processing of perceptual duration-based and beat-based timings affected brain activation patterns. Our participants listened to auditory sequences containing both single intervals and isochronous beats and judged either the duration of the intervals or the tempo of the beats. Whole-brain analysis revealed that both duration judgments and tempo judgments activated similar areas, including the basal ganglia and cerebellum, with no significant difference in the activated regions between the two conditions. In addition, an analysis of the regions of interest revealed no significant differences between the activation levels measured for the two tasks in the basal ganglia as well as the cerebellum. These results suggested that a set of common brain areas were involved in top-down processing of both duration judgments and tempo judgments. Our findings indicate that perceptual duration-based timing and beat-based timing are driven by stimulus regularity irrespective of top-down processing.

neuroscience↗