bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Nieminen, J. O.

Publications and source records attributed to Nieminen, J. O..

11 recordsLinked to original sources

A High-Precision Timing Method and Digital Interface for Closed-Loop TMS

ObjectiveCurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocols exhibit high inter-subject variability in treatment outcomes, highlighting the need for personalized, brain-state-dependent closed-loop stimulation protocols. To enable such protocols, we aim to provide robust, precisely timed external control of TMS, with stimulation timed relative to feedback signals such as the electroencephalogram (EEG). ApproachCommercial TMS devices typically rely on trigger signals for precise external pulse timing, while adjusting stimulation parameters, such as intensity, is better handled via serial digital communication, which supports robust error detection and feedback. However, combining these communication methods is inherently complex and prone to timing issues, such as race conditions. Furthermore, trigger signals lack capabilities essential for real-time systems, such as preventing late pulse delivery. We present a method for precise and accurate pulse timing, implemented through a digital interface that uses exclusively serial digital messaging, eliminating the need for trigger signals. This interface enables external control of pulse timing, intensity, and other parameters. The TMS device maintains its own internal clock and delivers pulses at pre-scheduled times, decoupling timing precision from the control device. Additionally, we propose a method for synchronizing such time-tracking TMS devices with commercial EEG systems, enabling precisely timed EEG-TMS. Main resultsUsing these methods, our custom TMS device delivered pulses precisely aligned to the EEG signal, with timing errors consistently below 0.3 ms. These errors were constrained by the experimental setup, including the sampling rate of our EEG device and the signal-to-noise ratio affecting pulse detection. SignificanceOur timing method achieves sub-millisecond precision in brain-state-dependent closed-loop EEG-TMS, providing a foundation for robust TMS timing that supports adaptive, personalized stimulation protocols. The digital control interface, co-designed with our TMS device, integrates pulse timing and parameters, setting a precedent for future advancements in computer-controlled TMS.

bioengineering↗

The dependency of TMS-evoked potentials on electric-field orientation in the cortex

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) stimulates the brain by electromagnetic induction. The outcome depends on multiple stimulation parameters such as the induced electric-field pattern (in particular, the location of the peak field and its orientation), intensity and timing. However, it is not clear how the TMS-evoked responses are affected by all the stimulation parameters. This study elucidates the dependency of the TMS-evoked electroencephalography (EEG) responses on the orientation of the stimulating electric field. To achieve this, we analysed a dataset from six subjects who were given pulses with 36 stimulus orientations to the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA). The TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) and induced oscillations were analysed with cluster-based statistics. Source estimation was performed to assess the effects of stimulus orientation on the TMS-evoked signal propagation. The amplitudes of the early peaks (20 and 40 ms after the TMS pulse) strongly depended on the electric field orientation. Our analysis suggested orientation dependency up to 100 ms post-stimulus in most subjects, indicating changes in stimulation efficacy and potential changes in signal propagation from the stimulated site. These results suggest that different orientations may perturb different networks. Thus, the orientation is a crucial parameter for the stimulation outcome and should be adjusted according to the cortical network under investigation.

neuroscience↗

A multi-channel TMS system enabling accurate stimulus orientation control during concurrent ultra-high-field MRI for preclinical applications

Monitoring cortical responses to neuromodulation protocols on preclinical models can elucidate fundamental mechanisms of brain function. Concurrent brain stimulation and imaging is challenging, usually compromising spatiotemporal resolution, accuracy, and versatility. Here we report a non-invasive brain stimulation system with electronic control of neuromodulation parameters in a 9.4-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) environment. In the imaging scanner, transcranial magnetic stimulation is delivered with a set of two coils and the MRI signals are recorded with a radiofrequency coil. The coil set provides millisecond-scale electronic control of the stimulus orientation with 1{degrees} resolution. Without physically rotating the coils, we evoked orientation-specific muscle responses after cortical stimulation on an anesthetized rat. We show that the stimulation pulses do not affect the anatomical imaging quality, and imaging signals are disrupted only if recorded before 10 ms after pulse delivery. Concurrent electronically targeted brain stimulation and neuroimaging sets the stage for the causal investigation of whole-brain network functions, endorsing more efficient treatment protocols.

neuroscience↗

Local brain-state dependency of effective connectivity: evidence from TMS-EEG

BackgroundSpontaneous cortical oscillations have been shown to modulate cortical responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). If not controlled for, they might increase variability in responses and mask meaningful changes in the signals of interest when studying the brain with TMS combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG). To address this challenge in future closed-loop stimulation paradigms, we need to understand how spontaneous oscillations affect TMS-evoked responses. ObjectiveTo describe the effect of the pre-stimulus phase of cortical mu (8-13 Hz) and beta (13-30 Hz) oscillations on TMS-induced effective connectivity patterns. MethodsWe applied TMS to the left primary motor cortex and right pre-supplementary motor area of three subjects while recording EEG. We classified trials off-line into positive- and negative-phase classes according to the mu and beta rhythms. We calculated differences in the global mean-field amplitude (GMFA) and compared the cortical spreading of the TMS-evoked activity between the two classes. ResultsPhase had significant effects on the GMFA in 11 out of 12 datasets (3 subjects x 2 stimulation sites x 2 frequency bands). Seven of the datasets showed significant differences in the time range 15-50 ms, nine in 50-150 ms, and eight after 150 ms post-stimulus. Source estimates showed complex spatial differences between the classes in the cortical spreading of the TMS-evoked activity. ConclusionsTMS-evoked effective connectivity appears to depend on the phase of local cortical oscillations at the stimulated site. This may be crucial for efficient design of future brain-state-dependent and closed-loop stimulation paradigms.

neuroscience↗

Multi-locus transcranial magnetic stimulation system for electronically targeted brain stimulation

BackgroundTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) allows non-invasive stimulation of the cortex. In multi-locus TMS (mTMS), the stimulating electric field (E-field) is controlled electronically without coil movement by adjusting currents in the coils of a transducer. ObjectiveTo develop an mTMS system that allows adjusting the location and orientation of the E-field maximum within a cortical region. MethodsWe designed and manufactured a planar 5-coil mTMS transducer to allow controlling the maximum of the induced E-field within a cortical region approximately 30 mm in diameter. We developed electronics with a design consisting of independently controlled H-bridge circuits to drive up to six TMS coils. To control the hardware, we programmed software that runs on a field-programmable gate array and a computer. To induce the desired E-field in the cortex, we developed an optimization method to calculate the currents needed in the coils. We characterized the mTMS system and conducted a proof-of-concept motor-mapping experiment on a healthy volunteer. In the motor mapping, we kept the transducer placement fixed while electronically shifting the E-field maximum on the precentral gyrus and measuring electromyography from the contralateral hand. ResultsThe transducer consists of an oval coil, two figure-of-eight coils, and two four-leaf-clover coils stacked on top of each other. The technical characterization indicated that the mTMS system performs as designed. The measured motor evoked potential amplitudes varied consistently as a function of the location of the E-field maximum. ConclusionThe developed mTMS system enables electronically targeted brain stimulation within a cortical region.

neuroscience↗

Closed-loop optimization of transcranial magnetic stimulation with electroencephalography feedback

BackgroundTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used in brain research and treatment of various brain dysfunctions. However, the optimal way to target stimulation and administer TMS therapies, for example, where and in which electric field direction the stimuli should be given, is yet to be determined. ObjectiveTo develop an automated closed-loop system for adjusting TMS parameters (in this work, the stimulus orientation) online based on TMS-evoked brain activity measured with electroencephalography (EEG). MethodsWe developed an automated closed-loop TMS-EEG set-up. In this set-up, the stimulus parameters are electronically adjusted with multi-locus TMS. As a proof of concept, we developed an algorithm that automatically optimizes the stimulation orientation based on single-trial EEG responses. We applied the algorithm to determine the electric field orientation that maximizes the amplitude of the TMS- EEG responses. The validation of the algorithm was performed with six healthy volunteers, repeating the search twenty times for each subject. ResultsThe validation demonstrated that the closed-loop control worked as desired despite the large variation in the single-trial EEG responses. We were often able to get close to the orientation that maximizes the EEG amplitude with only a few tens of pulses. ConclusionOptimizing stimulation with EEG feedback in a closed-loop manner is feasible and enables effective coupling to brain activity.

bioengineering↗

Trade-off between stimulation focality and the number of coils in multi-locus transcranial magnetic stimulation

ObjectiveCoils designed for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) must incorporate trade-offs between the required electrical power or energy, focality and depth penetration of the induced electric field (E-field), coil size, and mechanical properties of the coil, as all of them cannot be optimally met at the same time. In multi-locus TMS (mTMS), a transducer consisting of several coils allows electronically targeted stimulation of the cortex without physically moving a coil. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the number of coils in an mTMS transducer, the focality of the induced E-field, and the extent of the cortical region within which the location and orientation of the maximum of the induced E-field can be controlled. ApproachWe applied convex optimization to design planar and spherically curved mTMS transducers of different E-field focalities and analyzed their properties. We characterized the trade-off between the focality of the induced E-field and the extent of the cortical region that can be stimulated with an mTMS transducer with a given number of coils. Main resultsAt the expense of the E-field focality, one can, with the same number of coils, design an mTMS transducer that can control the location and orientation of the peak of the induced E-field within a wider cortical region. SignificanceWith E-fields of moderate focality, the problem of electronically targeted TMS becomes considerably easier compared with highly focal E-fields; this may speed up the development of mTMS and the emergence of new clinical and research applications.

neuroscience↗

Probing the orientation specificity of excitatory and inhibitory circuitries in the primary motor cortex with multi-channel TMS

BackgroundThe electric field orientation is a crucial parameter for optimizing the excitation of neuronal tissue in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Yet, the effects of stimulus orientation on the short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) paradigms are poorly known, mainly due to significant technical challenges in manipulating the TMS-induced stimulus orientation within milliseconds. ObjectiveOur aim is to assess the effect of the TMS-induced stimulus orientation on the SICI and ICF paradigms and search for the optimal orientations to maximize the facilitation and suppression of the motor evoked potentials (MEP). MethodsWe applied paired-pulse multi-channel TMS in healthy subjects to generate SICI and ICF with conditioning and test pulses in the same, opposite, and perpendicular orientations to each other. The conditioning- and test-stimulus intensities were 80% and 110% of the resting motor threshold, respectively. ResultsBoth SICI and ICF were significantly affected by the conditioning- and test-stimulus orientation. MEP suppression and facilitation were strongest with both pulses delivered in the same direction. SICI with a 2.5-ms and ICF with a 6.0-ms interstimulus interval (ISI) were more sensitive to changes in stimulus orientation compared with SICI at 0.5- and ICF at 8.0-ms ISIs, respectively. ConclusionOur findings provide evidence that SICI and ICF at specific ISIs are mediated by distinct mechanisms. Such mechanisms exhibit a preferential orientation depending on the anatomical and morphological arrangement of inhibitory and excitatory neuronal populations. We also demonstrate that the SICI and ICF can be maximized by adjusting the TMS-induced electric field orientation.

neuroscience↗

Fine multi-coil electronic control of transcranial magnetic stimulation: effects of stimulus orientation and intensity

BackgroundTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coils allow only a slow, mechanical adjustment of the stimulating electric field (E-field) orientation in the cerebral tissue. Fast E-field control is needed to synchronize the stimulation with the ongoing brain activity. Also, empirical models that fully describe the relationship between evoked responses and the stimulus orientation and intensity are still missing. ObjectiveWe aimed to (1) develop a TMS transducer for manipulating the E-field orientation electronically with high accuracy at the neuronally meaningful millisecond-level time scale and (2) devise and validate a physiologically based model describing the orientation selectivity of neuronal excitability. MethodsWe designed and manufactured a two-coil TMS transducer. The coil windings were computed with a minimum-energy optimization procedure, and the transducer was controlled with our custom-made electronics. The electronic E-field control was verified with a TMS characterizer. The motor evoked potential amplitude and latency of a hand muscle were mapped in 3{degrees} steps of the stimulus orientation in 16 healthy subjects for three stimulation intensities. We fitted a logistic model to the motor response amplitude. ResultsThe two-coil TMS transducer allows one to manipulate the pulse orientation accurately without manual coil movement. The motor response amplitude followed a logistic function of the stimulus orientation; this dependency was strongly affected by the stimulus intensity. ConclusionThe developed electronic control of the E-field orientation allows exploring new stimulation paradigms and probing neuronal mechanisms. The presented model helps to disentangle the neuronal mechanisms of brain function and guide future non-invasive stimulation protocols.

neuroscience↗

Automated search of stimulation targets with closed-loop transcranial magnetic stimulation

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocols often include a manual search of an optimal location and orientation of the coil or peak stimulating electric field to elicit motor responses in a target muscle. This target search is laborious, and the result is user-dependent. Here, we present a closed-loop search method that utilizes automatic electronic adjustment of the stimulation based on the previous responses. The electronic adjustment is achieved by multi-locus TMS, and the adaptive guiding of the stimulation is based on the principles of Bayesian optimization to minimize the number of stimuli (and time) needed in the search. We compared our target-search method with other methods, such as systematic sampling in a predefined cortical grid. Validation experiments on five healthy volunteers and further offline simulations showed that our adaptively guided search method needs only a relatively small number of stimuli to provide outcomes with good accuracy and precision. The automated method enables fast and user-independent optimization of stimulation parameters in research and clinical applications of TMS.Competing Interest StatementRJI is an advisor and a minority shareholder of Nexstim Plc. The other authors declare no competing interests.View Full Text

bioengineering↗

Individual head models for estimating the TMS-induced electric field in rat brain

In transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), the initial cortical activation due to stimulation is determined by the state of the brain and the magnitude, waveform, and direction of the induced electric field (E-field) in the cortex. The E-field distribution depends on the conductivity geometry of the head. The effects of deviations from a spherically symmetric conductivity profile have been studied in detail in humans. In small mammals, such as rats, these effects are more pronounced due to their smaller and less spherical heads. In this study, we describe a simple method for building individual realistically shaped head models for rats from high-resolution X-ray tomography images. We computed the TMS-induced E-field with the boundary element method and assessed the effect of head-model simplifications on the estimated E-field. The deviations from spherical symmetry have large, non-trivial effects on the E-field distribution: in some cases, even the direction of the E-field in the cortex cannot be reliably predicted by the coil orientation unless these deviations are properly considered.

neuroscience↗