bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Nielsen, J.-F.

Publications and source records attributed to Nielsen, J.-F..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Impact of Tissue Sample Preparation Methods on Myelin-Sensitive Quantitative MR Imaging

PurposeValidation of quantitative MRI (qMRI) parameters with histology is often done with ex vivo fixed tissue samples. Freezing is another common form of tissue preservation, but the effects of freezing and thawing tissue on myelin-sensitive quantitative MRI parameters and their correlation with histology require further analysis. MethodsMyelin water imaging, off-resonance RF saturation magnetization transfer (MT), and selective inversion recovery MT MRI experiments were conducted on 14 fresh, thawed, and fixed sheep brain tissue samples to calculate various surrogate measures of myelin content. These measures were compared with luxol fast blue (LFB) histological stain results. ResultsFresh, thawed, and fixed tissue qMRI values correlated well with LFB. Thawed and fixed tissue exhibited modest increases, between 3-32%, for most qMRI parameter values compared to fresh. Histology results showed that thawed samples did not lose tissue integrity from the freezing process. ConclusionFreezing is a reasonable alternative tissue preservation method to fixation for use in qMRI analysis, but may differentially affect qMRI parameter values in regions with varying myelin content.

bioengineering↗

Time-division multiplexing (TDM) sequence removes bias in T2 estimation and relaxation-diffusion measurements

PurposeTo compare the performance of multi-echo (ME) and time-division multiplexing (TDM) sequences for accelerated relaxation-diffusion MRI (rdMRI) acquisition and to examine their reliability in estimating accurate rdMRI microstructure measures. MethodThe ME, TDM, and the reference single-echo (SE) sequences with six echo times (TE) were implemented using Pulseq with single-band (SB-) and multi-band 2 (MB2-) acceleration factors. On a diffusion phantom, the image intensities of the three sequences were compared, and the differences were quantified using the normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE). For the in-vivo brain scan, besides the image intensity comparison and T2-estimates, different methods were used to assess sequence-related effects on microstructure estimation, including the relaxation diffusion imaging moment (REDIM) and the maximum-entropy relaxation diffusion distribution (MaxEnt-RDD). ResultsTDM performance was similar to the gold standard SE acquisition, whereas ME showed greater biases (3-4x larger NRMSEs for phantom, 2x for in-vivo). T2 values obtained from TDM closely matched SE, whereas ME sequences underestimated the T2 relaxation time. TDM provided similar diffusion and relaxation parameters as SE using REDIM, whereas SB-ME exhibited a 60% larger bias in the map and on average 3.5x larger bias in the covariance between relaxation-diffusion coefficients. ConclusionOur analysis demonstrates that TDM provides a more accurate estimation of relaxation-diffusion measurements while accelerating the acquisitions by a factor of 2 to 3.

neuroscience↗