Biology subjects

Nichols, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Nichols, T..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Beyond Bonferroni Revisited: Concerns over inflated false positives in conservation genetics, genetics, and neuroscience

In 2006, Narum published a paper in Conservation Genetics that was motivated by the stringent nature of the Bonferroni approach for family wise error correction. That work suggested that the approach of Benjamini and Yekutieli in 2001 provided adequate correction and was more biologically relevant. However, there are crucial differences between the original Benjamini and Yekutieli procedure and that described by Narum. After carefully reviewing both papers, we believe that the Narum procedure is both different than the Benjamini and Yekutieli procedure and does not adequately control for family wise error. We provide an overview of approaches for FWE correction as well as evidence for the faulty implementation of the Benjamini and Yekutieli procedure by Narum using the equations from the respective papers, data from both papers, and the results of simulation.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Large-scale neuroimaging and genetic study reveals genetic architecture of brain white matter microstructure

Microstructural changes of white matter (WM) tracts are known to be associated with various neuropsychiatric disorders/diseases. Heritability of structural changes of WM tracts has been examined using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in family-based studies for different age groups. The availability of genetic and DTI data from recent large population-based studies offers opportunity to further improve our understanding of genetic contributions. Here, we analyzed the genetic architecture of WM tracts using DTI and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data of unrelated individuals in the UK Biobank (n [~] 8000). The DTI parameters were generated using the ENIGMA-DTI pipeline. We found that DTI parameters are substantially heritable on most WM tracts. We observed a highly polygenic or omnigenic architecture of genetic influence across the genome as well as the enrichment of SNPs in active chromatin regions. Our bivariate analyses showed strong genetic correlations for several pairs of WM tracts as well as pairs of DTI parameters. We performed voxel-based analysis to illustrate the pattern of genetic effects on selected parts of the tract-based spatial statistics skeleton. Comparing the estimates from the UK Biobank to those from small population-based studies, we illustrated that sufficiently large sample size is essential for genetic architecture discovery in imaging genetics. We confirmed this finding with a simulation study.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Exploring the Impact of Analysis Software on Task fMRI Results

A wealth of analysis tools are available to fMRI researchers in order to extract patterns of task variation and, ultimately, understand cognitive function. However, this methodological plurality comes with a drawback. While conceptually similar, two different analysis pipelines applied on the same dataset may not produce the same scientific results. Differences in methods, implementations across software packages, and even operating systems or software versions all contribute to this variability. Consequently, attention in the field has recently been directed to reproducibility and data sharing. Neuroimaging is currently experiencing a surge in initiatives to improve research practices and ensure that all conclusions inferred from an fMRI study are replicable.\n\nIn this work, our goal is to understand how choice of software package impacts on analysis results. We use publically shared data from three published task fMRI neuroimaging studies, reanalyzing each study using the three main neuroimaging software packages, AFNI, FSL and SPM, using parametric and nonparametric inference. We obtain all information on how to process, analyze, and model each dataset from the publications. We make quantitative and qualitative comparisons between our replications to gauge the scale of variability in our results and assess the fundamental differences between each software package. While qualitatively we find broad similarities between packages, we also discover marked differences, such as Dice similarity coefficients ranging from 0.000 - 0.743 in comparisons of thresholded statistic maps between software. We discuss the challenges involved in trying to reanalyse the published studies, and highlight our own efforts to make this research reproducible.

neuroscience↗