bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Newton, A. T.

Publications and source records attributed to Newton, A. T..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

White matter geometry confounds Diffusion Tensor Imaging Along Perivascular Space (DTI-ALPS) measures

IntroductionThe perivascular space (PVS) is integral to glymphatic function, facilitating fluid exchange and waste clearance in the brain. Diffusion Tensor Imaging Along the Perivascular Space (DTI-ALPS) has been proposed as a non-invasive marker of perivascular diffusion, yet its specificity remains unclear. ALPS measures assume that radial asymmetry in white matter diffusivity predominantly reflects PVS contributions. However, anatomical and microstructural confounds may influence these metrics. MethodsWe systematically evaluated potential biases in ALPS-derived measures using high-resolution, multi-shell diffusion MRI from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) and high-field imaging. Specifically, we examined (1) the prevalence of radial asymmetry across white matter, (2) the influence of crossing fibers on ALPS indices, (3) the impact of axonal undulations and dispersion, and (4) the spatial alignment of vasculature with white matter in ALPS-associated regions. ResultsRadial asymmetry is widespread across white matter and persists even at high b-values, suggesting a dominant contribution from axonal geometry rather than faster PVS-specific diffusion. Crossing fibers significantly inflate ALPS indices, with greater radial asymmetry observed in regions with a greater prevalence of crossing fibers. Furthermore, anisotropic axonal dispersion and undulations introduce systematic asymmetry independent of perivascular diffusion. Finally, high-resolution vascular imaging reveals substantial heterogeneity in medullary vein orientation, challenging the assumption that PVS consistently aligns with the left-right axis in ALPS regions. ConclusionALPS indices are significantly influenced by white matter microstructure, including fiber crossings, undulations, and dispersion. These findings suggest that ALPS-derived metrics may not provide a direct measure of glymphatic function but rather reflect underlying axonal geometry. Interpretations of ALPS-derived metrics as biomarkers of glymphatic function must consider these anatomical complexities, and future studies should integrate advanced modeling approaches to disentangle perivascular contributions from white matter structure.

neuroscience↗

Small volume blood-brain barrier opening in macaques with a 1 MHz ultrasound phased array

Focused ultrasound blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening is a promising tool for targeted delivery of therapeutic agents into the brain. The volume of opening determines the extent of therapeutic administration and sets a lower bound on the size of targets which can be selectively treated. We tested a custom 1 MHz array transducer optimized for cortical regions in the macaque brain with the goal of achieving small volume openings. We integrated this device into a magnetic resonance image guided focused ultrasound system and demonstrated twelve instances of small volume BBB opening with average opening volumes of 59 {+/-} 37 mm3 and 184 {+/-} 2 mm3 in cortical and subcortical targets, respectively. We developed real-time cavitation monitoring using a passive cavitation detector embedded in the array and characterized its performance on a bench-top flow phantom mimicking transcranial BBB opening procedures. We monitored cavitation during in-vivo procedures and compared cavitation metrics against opening volumes and safety outcomes measured with FLAIR and susceptibility weighted MR imaging. Our findings show small BBB opening at cortical targets in macaques and characterize the safe pressure range for 1 MHz BBB opening. Additionally, we used subject-specific simulations to investigate variance in measured opening volumes and found high correlation (R2 = 0.8577) between simulation predictions and observed measurements. Simulations suggest the threshold for 1 MHz BBB opening was 0.53 MPa. This system enables BBB opening for drug delivery and gene therapy to be targeted to more specific brain regions.

bioengineering↗

MASiVar: Multisite, Multiscanner, and Multisubject Acquisitions for Studying Variability in Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging

PurposeDiffusion weighted imaging (DWI) allows investigators to identify structural, microstructural, and connectivitybased differences between subjects, but variability due to session and scanner biases is a challenge. MethodsTo investigate DWI variability, we present MASiVar, a multisite dataset consisting of 319 diffusion scans acquired at 3T from b = 1000 to 3000 s/mm2 across 14 healthy adults, 83 healthy children (5 to 8 years), three sites, and four scanners as a publicly available, preprocessed, and de-identified dataset. With the adult data, we demonstrate the capacity of MASiVar to simultaneously quantify the intrasession, intersession, interscanner, and intersubject variability of four common DWI processing approaches: (1) a tensor signal representation, (2) a multi-compartment neurite orientation dispersion and density model, (3) white matter bundle segmentation, and (4) structural connectomics. Respectively, we evaluate region-wise fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity, and principal eigenvector; region-wise cerebral spinal fluid volume fraction, intracellular volume fraction, and orientation dispersion index; bundle-wise shape, volume, FA, and length; and whole connectome correlation and maximized modularity, global efficiency, and characteristic path length. ResultsWe plot the variability in these measures at each level and find that it consistently increases with intrasession to intersession to interscanner to intersubject effects across all processing approaches and that sometimes interscanner variability can approach intersubject variability. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the potential of MASiVar to more globally investigate DWI variability across multiple levels and processing approaches simultaneously and suggests harmonization between scanners for multisite analyses should be considered prior to inference of group differences on subjects.

bioengineering↗

Thickness of deep layers in the fusiform face area predicts face recognition

People with superior face recognition have relatively thin cortex in face-selective brain areas, while those with superior vehicle recognition have relatively thick cortex in the same areas. We suggest that these opposite correlations reflect distinct mechanisms influencing cortical thickness (CT) for abilities acquired at different points in development. We explore a new prediction regarding the specificity of these effects through the depth of the cortex: that face recognition selectively and negatively correlates with thickness of the deepest laminar subdivision in face-selective areas. With ultra-high resolution MRI at 7T, we estimated the thickness of three laminar subdivisions, which we term MR layers, in the right fusiform face area (rFFA) in 14 adult male humans. Face recognition was negatively associated with the thickness of deep MR layers, while vehicle recognition was positively related to the thickness of all layers. Regression model comparisons provided overwhelming support for a model specifying that the magnitude of the association between face recognition and CT differs across MR layers (deep vs. superficial/middle) while the magnitude of the association between vehicle recognition and CT is invariant across layers. The total CT of rFFA accounted for 69% of the variance in face recognition, and thickness of the deep layer alone accounted for 84% of this variance. Our findings demonstrate the functional validity of MR laminar estimates in FFA. Studying the structural basis of individual differences for multiple abilities in the same cortical area can reveal effects of distinct mechanisms that are not apparent when studying average variation or development.\n\nSignificance StatementFace and object recognition vary in the normal population and are only modestly related to each other. The recognition of faces and vehicles are both positively related to neural responses in the fusiform face area (FFA), but show different relations to the cortical thickness of FFA. Here, we use very high-resolution MRI, and find that face recognition ability (a skill acquired early in life) is negatively correlated with thickness of FFAs deepest MR-defined layers, whereas recognition of vehicles (a skill acquired later in life) is positively related to thickness at of all cortical layers. Our methods can be used in the future to characterize sources of variability in human abilities and relate them to distinct mechanisms of neural plasticity.

neuroscience↗

Tractography Reproducibility Challenge with Empirical Data (TraCED): The 2017 ISMRM Diffusion Study Group Challenge

PurposeFiber tracking with diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging has become an essential tool for estimating in vivo brain white matter architecture. Fiber tracking results are sensitive to the choice of processing method and tracking criteria. Phantom studies provide concrete quantitative comparisons of methods relative to absolute ground truths, yet do not capture variabilities because of in vivo physiological factors.\n\nMethodsTo date, a large-scale reproducibility analysis has not been performed for the assessment of the newest generation of tractography algorithms with in vivo data. Reproducibility does not assess the validity of a brain connection however it is still of critical importance because it describes the variability for an algorithm in group studies. The ISMRM 2017 TraCED challenge was created to fulfill the gap. The TraCED dataset consists of a single healthy volunteer scanned on two different scanners of the same manufacturer. The multi-shell acquisition included b-values of 1000, 2000 and 3000 s/mm2 with 20, 45 and 64 diffusion gradient directions per shell, respectively.\n\nResultsNine international groups submitted 46 tractography algorithm entries. The top five submissions had high ICC > 0.88. Reproducibility is high within these top 5 submissions when assessed across sessions or across scanners. However, it can be directly attributed to containment of smaller volume tracts in larger volume tracts. This holds true for the top five submissions where they are contained in a specific order. While most algorithms are contained in an ordering there are some outliers.\n\nConclusionThe different methods clearly result in fundamentally different tract structures at the more conservative specificity choices (i.e., volumetrically smaller tractograms). The data and challenge infrastructure remain available for continued analysis and provide a platform for comparison.

neuroscience↗