Nevers, Y. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2021

Protein length distribution is remarkably consistent across Life

In every living species, the function of a protein depends on its organisation of structural domains, and the length of a protein is a direct reflection of this. Because every species evolved under different evolutionary pressures, the protein length distribution, much like other genomic features, is expected to vary across species. Here we evaluated this diversity by comparing protein length distribution across 2,326 species (1,688 bacteria, 153 archaea and 485 eukaryotes). We found that proteins tend to be on average slightly longer in eukaryotes than in bacteria or archaea, but that the variation of length distribution across species is low, especially compared to the variation of other genomic features (genome size, number of proteins, gene length, GC content, isoelectric points of proteins). Moreover, most cases of atypical protein length distribution appear to be due to artifactual gene annotation, suggesting the actual variation of protein length distribution across species is even smaller. These results open the way for developing a genome annotation quality metric based on protein length distribution to complement conventional quality measures. Overall, our findings show that protein length distribution between living species is more consistent than previously thought, and provide evidence for a universal purifying selection on protein length, whose mechanism and fitness effect remain intriguing open questions.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2020

A Linear-Time Solution to the Labeled Robinson-Foulds Distance Problem

MotivationComparing trees is a basic task for many purposes, and especially in phylogeny where different tree reconstruction tools may lead to different trees, likely representing contradictory evolutionary information. While a large variety of pairwise measures of similarity or dissimilarity have been developed for comparing trees with no information on internal nodes, very few address the case of inner node-labeled trees. Yet such trees are common; for instance reconciled gene trees have inner nodes labeled with the type of event giving rise to them, typically speciation or duplication. Recently, we proposed a formulation of the Labeled Robinson Foulds edit distance with edge extensions, edge contractions between identically labeled nodes, and node label flips. However, this distance proved difficult to compute, in particular because shortest edit paths can require contracting "good" edges, i.e. edges present in the two trees. ResultsHere, we report on a different formulation of the Labeled Robinson Foulds edit distance -- based on node insertion, deletion and label substitution -- which we show can be computed in linear time. The new formulation also maintains other desirable properties: being a metric, reducing to Robinson Foulds for unlabeled trees and maintaining an intuitive interpretation. The new distance is computable for an arbitrary number of label types, thus making it useful for applications involving not only speciations and duplications, but also horizontal gene transfers and further events associated with the internal nodes of the tree. To illustrate the utility of the new distance, we use it to study the impact of taxon sampling on labeled gene tree inference, and conclude that denser taxon sampling yields better trees.

bioinformatics↗