Biology subjects

Nentidis, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Nentidis, A..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Mapping the AI Life Sciences Landscape in Greece: A National Survey and Bibliometric Comparison with Global Trends

Artificial intelligence is increasingly used in Life Sciences, though the pace and direction of adoption varies widely across countries. To map the Greek landscape, we combined two complementary approaches, a data-driven analysis of 916,824 AI-related life-science papers harvested from OpenAlex and PubMed and a targeted short survey at a national level aimed towards researchers, engineers, and support staff to be used as supporting material. We tagged each publication with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and compared topic frequencies between articles linked to at least one Greek institution and the rest of the world. Greek-affiliated outputs are disproportionately concentrated under the theme of methodology and algorithm-development, whereas the global corpus is dominated by disease-focused, organism-centered and clinical applications. Statistical contrasts across three MeSH hierarchy levels exposed clear national strengths in machine learning techniques and analytical tools, alongside under-representation in translational, patient-centred research. Survey responses reinforce these patterns: participants highlight limited access to well-curated biomedical data, constrained computational resources and difficulty recruiting cross-disciplinary talent as the chief barriers to progress. They advocate community-building actions (e.g., hackathons, postgraduate training, shared data infrastructures) that could realign national efforts with international practice while capitalizing on existing expertise in core-methodology development. Overall this study combines bibliometric evidence with community perspectives and provides a comprehensive overview of AI activity in Life Sciences in Greece, highlighting potential thematic strengths and gaps.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2022

BioASQ-QA: A manually curated corpus for Biomedical Question Answering

The BioASQ question answering (QA) benchmark dataset contains questions in English, along with golden standard (reference) answers and related material. The dataset has been designed to reflect real information needs of biomedical experts and is therefore more realistic and challenging than most existing datasets. Furthermore, unlike most previous QA benchmarks that contain only exact answers, the BioASQ-QA dataset also includes ideal answers (in effect summaries), which are particularly useful for research on multi-document summarization. The dataset combines structured and unstructured data. The material linked with each question comprise documents and snippets, which are useful for Information Retrieval and Passage Retrieval experiments, as well as concepts that are useful in concept-to-text Natural Language Generation. Researchers working on paraphrasing and textual entailment can also measure the degree to which their methods improve the performance of biomedical QA systems. Last but not least, the dataset is continuously extended, as the BioASQ challenge is running and new data are generated.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2022

CRISPRedict: The case for simple and interpretable efficiency prediction for CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing

The development of the CRISPR-Cas9 technology has provided a simple yet powerful system for targeted genome editing. Compared with previous gene-editing tools, the CRISPR-Cas9 system identifies target sites by the complementarity between the guide RNA (gRNA) and the DNA sequence, which is less expensive and time-consuming, as well as more precise and scalable. To effectively apply the CRISPR-Cas9 system, researchers need to identify target sites that can be cleaved efficiently and for which the candidate gRNAs have little or no cleavage at other genomic locations. For this reason, numerous computational approaches have been developed to predict cleavage efficiency and exclude undesirable targets. However, current design tools cannot robustly predict experimental success as prediction accuracy depends on the assumptions of the underlying model and how closely the experimental setup matches the training data. Moreover, the most successful tools implement complex machine learning and deep learning models, leading to predictions that are not easily interpretable. Here, we introduce CRISPRedict, a simple linear model that provides accurate and inter-pretable predictions for guide design. Comprehensive evaluation on twelve independent datasets demonstrated that CRISPRedict has an equivalent performance with the currently most accurate tools and outperforms the remaining ones. Moreover, it has the most robust performance for both U6 and T7 data, illustrating its applicability to tasks under different conditions. Therefore, our system can assist researchers in the gRNA design process by providing accurate and explainable predictions. These predictions can then be used to guide genome editing experiments and make plausible hypotheses for further investigation. The source code of CRISPRedict along with instructions for use is available at https://github.com/VKonstantakos/CRISPRedict.

bioinformatics↗