bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Naveen, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Naveen, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A human iPSC-derived motor neuron-myogenic cell coculture platform to evaluate neuromuscular junction innervation after axon injury and in Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Traumatic nerve injury is challenging as motor neurons with damaged axons repair slowly, which can lead to muscle degeneration, while in Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA), muscle innervation is reduced. While pro-regenerative or neuroprotective compounds have been identified, their specific ability to enhance or restore neuromuscular junction (NMJ) function in patients remains unclear due to a lack of in vitro human models that track axon growth, NMJ innervation and muscle function. We developed a human iPSC-derived motor neuron-myogenic coculture platform that enables real-time monitoring of axon growth NMJ innervation and axon regeneration and muscle activity following axonal injury, and for SMA-derived motor neurons. We identified spontaneous synchronized GCaMP6f muscle activity as a useful functional marker of NMJ formation. Using this platform, we show that blebbistatin, a pro-regenerative non-muscle myosin II (NMII) inhibitor differentially regulates growth cone dynamics in injured versus uninjured motor neurons, resulting in enhanced NMJ reinnervation. This highlights the therapeutic potential of developing pro-regenerative compounds to promote NMJ innervation. We also confirm that NMJ function is reduced in SMA type 0 (prenatal onset) and type I (pediatric onset) patient-derived motor neurons in the coculture. This human stem cell-based framework can be used, therefore, to evaluate pro-regenerative compounds for axon injury and neuroprotective one for neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders.

neuroscience↗

Subconcussive preconditioning prevents microglial morphology changes and improves cognitive outcomes in mice

Subconcussive impacts are highly prevalent in contact sports and are thought to increase concussion risk. However, the specific conditions under which these subconcussive impacts influence concussion outcomes are uncertain, limiting our understanding of the mechanisms behind repetitive head trauma. Given that subconcussive impacts elicit a microglial response, and microglial morphology offers insight into function, we examined how subconcussive preconditioning affects microglial morphology and cognitive outcome after concussion. To investigate this question, we developed and validated a scalable, closed-head controlled cortical impact model. Using this approach, we found that although concussion elicited features of hypersurveillant microglia at 1 day post-injury, they resolve by 9 days post-injury, and subconcussive impacts only produced microglial changes at 9 days post-injury. When subconcussive impacts preceded a concussive impact (i.e., preconditioned concussion) no changes in microglial morphology appeared at either 1 or 9 days after injury. Interestingly, subconcussive preconditioning eliminated concussion-associated cognitive deficits in novel object recognition and this cognitive protection was time dependent: preconditioning impacts were only protective if delivered within 2 minutes of concussion, and had no effect if delivered over a 48-hour window. These results suggest that some types of subconcussive impacts may offer protection against subsequent concussion and mitigate changes in microglial morphology. Understanding this timing window could inform strategies for minimizing cognitive impairments in athletes exposed to repetitive head trauma.

bioengineering↗