bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Natsidis, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Natsidis, P..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

A phylogeny aware analysis of gene function for the biodiversity genomics era

In the biodiversity genomics era, vast gene catalogs have rapidly accumulated, but how gene functions map onto major evolutionary transitions remains vague. We integrated phylogenomics with functional annotations to trace the emergence of [~]4.5 million genes and their associated functions in 508 representative species across the tree of life. Using this top-down, function-centric approach, we mapped the evolutionary history of well-annotated biological functions, revealing key insights and widespread parallelism. For instance, the largest bursts of gene and function gains aligned with key evolutionary transitions, including the origins of eukaryotes, animals, land plants, and vertebrates. Independent transitions to multicellularity and terrestrial life showed convergent enrichment of semantically similar functions (involving entirely different gene families), and the presence of orthologous genes often belonging to ancient gene families. For example, terrestrialization nodes in slime molds, plants, and animals coincided with gains in stress-tolerance and developmental genes, whereas multicellularity in animals, fungi, plants, and slime molds consistently involved expansions in cell-adhesion and communication functions. Thus, our framework enables scalable interpretation of new genomes in an evolutionary context and offers a roadmap for exploring the genomic basis of biodiversity.

evolutionary biology↗

Support for the deuterostome clade comes from systematic errors

There is a long-standing consensus that the animal phyla closest to our own phylum of Chordata are the Echinodermata and Hemichordata. These three phyla constitute the major clade of Deuterostomia. Recent analyses have questioned the support for the monophyly of Deuterostomia, however, showing that the branch leading to deuterostomes is very short and may be influenced by systematic error. Here we use a site-by-site approach to explore multiple sources of error. Under conditions that promote long-branch attraction (LBA) - especially branch-length heterogeneity and sites constrained in their amino acid composition - we find that deuterostome monophyly is strongly supported. When we make efforts to mitigate these sources of error, we cannot distinguish between monophyletic and paraphyletic Deuterostomia. Our findings have implications for the interpretation of putative deuterostome fossils, for the reconstruction of a bilaterian ancestor and, more generally, for how datasets for deep-time phylogenetic analyses are assembled and analyzed. TeaserThe apparently close relationship between Chordata and Ambulacraria (echinoderms and hemichordates) is boosted by a long-branch attraction artefact.

evolutionary biology↗

Dollo parsimony overestimates ancestral gene content reconstructions

Ancestral reconstruction is a widely-used technique that has been applied to understand the history of gain and loss of gene families over evolutionary time scales, and to produce hypotheses on how these gains and losses may have influenced the evolutionary trajectories of extant organisms. Ancestral gene content can be reconstructed via different phylogenetic methods, such as maximum likelihood or Bayesian inference, but many current and previous studies employ Dollo parsimony. We hypothesize that Dollo parsimony is not appropriate for ancestral gene content reconstruction inferences based on sequence homology, as Dollo parsimony is derived from the assumption that a complex character can only be gained once in evolutionary history. This premise does not accurately model molecular sequence evolution, in which false orthology can result from sequence convergence (including random sequence similarity and parallel gene gains), non-orthologous homology or lateral gene transfer. The aim of this study is to test Dollo parsimonys suitability for ancestral gene content reconstruction and to compare its inferences with a maximum likelihood-based approach which allows a gene family to be gained more than once within a tree. In order to test our hypothesis, we first compared the performance of the two approaches on a series of artificial datasets each of 5,000 genes that were simulated according to a spectrum of evolutionary rates. Next, we reconstructed protein domain evolution on a phylogeny representing known eukaryotic diversity. We observed that Dollo parsimony produced numerous ancestral gene content overestimations, which were more pronounced at nodes closer to the root of the tree. These observations led us to the conclusion that, confirming our hypothesis, Dollo parsimony is not an appropriate method for ancestral reconstruction studies based on sequence homology.

evolutionary biology↗

The slow evolving genome of the xenacoelomorph worm Xenoturbella bocki

The evolutionary origins of Bilateria remain enigmatic. One of the more enduring proposals highlights similarities between a cnidarian-like planula larva and simple acoel-like flatworms. This idea is based in part on the view of the Xenacoelomorpha as an outgroup to all other bilaterians which are themselves designated the Nephrozoa (protostomes and deuterostomes). Genome data can help to elucidate phylogenetic relationships and provide important comparative data. Here we assemble and analyse the genome of the simple, marine xenacoelomorph Xenoturbella bocki, a key species for our understanding of early bilaterian and deuterostome evolution. Our highly contiguous genome assembly of X. bocki has a size of [~]111 Mbp in 18 chromosome like scaffolds, with repeat content and intron, exon and intergenic space comparable to other bilaterian invertebrates. We find X. bocki to have a similar number of genes to other bilaterians and to have retained ancestral metazoan synteny. Key bilaterian signalling pathways are also largely complete and most bilaterian miRNAs are present. We conclude that X. bocki has a complex genome typical of bilaterians, in contrast to the apparent simplicity of its body plan. Overall, our data do not provide evidence supporting the idea that Xenacoelomorpha are a primitively simple outgroup to other bilaterians and gene presence/absence data support a relationship with Ambulacraria.

evolutionary biology↗

Systematic errors in orthology inference: a bug or a feature for evolutionary analyses?

Introductory paragraphThe availability of complete sets of genes from many organisms makes it possible to identify genes unique to (or lost from) certain clades. This information is used to reconstruct phylogenetic trees; to identify genes involved in the evolution of clade specific novelties; and for phylostratigraphy - identifying ages of genes in a given species. These investigations rely on accurately predicted orthologs. Here we use simulation to produce sets of orthologs which experience no gains or losses. We show that errors in identifying orthologs increase with higher rates of evolution. We use the predicted sets of orthologs, with errors, to reconstruct phylogenetic trees; to count gains and losses; and for phylostratigraphy. Our simulated data, containing information only from errors in orthology prediction, closely recapitulate findings from empirical data. We suggest published downstream analyses must be informed to a large extent by errors in orthology prediction which mimic expected patterns of gene evolution.

evolutionary biology↗

Lack of support for Deuterostomia prompts reinterpretation of the first Bilateria.

The bilaterally symmetric animals (Bilateria) are considered to comprise two monophyletic groups, Protostomia and Deuterostomia. Protostomia contains the Ecdysozoa and the Lophotrochozoa; Deuterostomia contains the Chordata and the Xenambulacraria (Hemichordata, Echinodermata and Xenacoelomorpha). Their names refer to a supposed distinct origin of the mouth (stoma) in the two clades, but these groups have been differentiated by other embryological characters including embryonic cleavage patterns and different ways of forming their mesoderm and coeloms. Deuterostome monophyly is not consistently supported by recent studies. Here we compare support for Protostomia and Deuterostomia using five recently published, phylogenomic datasets. Protostomia is always strongly supported, especially by longer and higher quality genes. Support for Deuterostomia is always equivocal and barely higher than support for paraphyletic alternatives. Conditions that can cause tree reconstruction errors - inadequate models, short internal branch, faster evolving genes, and unequal branch lengths - correlate with statistical support for monophyletic deuterostomes. Simulation experiments show that support for Deuterostomia could be explained by systematic error. A survey of molecular characters supposedly diagnostic of deuterostomes shows many are not valid synapomorphies. The branch between bilaterian and deuterostome common ancestors, if real, is very short. This finding fits with growing evidence suggesting the common ancestor of all Bilateria had many deuterostome characteristics. This finding has important implications for our understanding of early animal evolution and for the interpretation of some enigmatic Cambrian fossils such as vetulicolians and banffiids.

evolutionary biology↗

Computational discovery of hidden breaks in 28S rRNA across eukaryotes and consequences for RNA Integrity Numbers

In some eukaryotes, a hidden break has been described in which the 28S ribosomal RNA molecule is cleaved into two subparts. The break is common in protostome animals (arthropods, molluscs, annelids etc.) but a break has also been reported in some vertebrates and non-metazoan eukaryotes. We present a new computational approach to determine the presence of the hidden break in 28S rRNAs using mapping of RNA-Seq data. We find a homologous break is present across protostomes although has been lost in a small number of taxa. We show that rare breaks in vertebrate 28S rRNAs are not homologous to the protostome break. A break is found in just 4 out of 331 species of non-animal eukaryotes studied and three of these are located in the same position as the protostome break suggesting a striking instance of convergent evolution. RNA Integrity Numbers (RIN) rely on intact 28s rRNA and will be consistently underestimated in the great majority of animal species with a break.

bioinformatics↗

Phylogenomics investigation of sparids (Teleostei: Spariformes) using high-quality proteomes highlights the importance of taxon sampling

Sparidae (Teleostei: Spariformes) are a family of fish constituted by approximately 150 species with high popularity and commercial value, such as porgies and seabreams. Although the phylogeny of this family has been investigated multiple times, its position among other teleost groups remains ambiguous. Most studies have used a single or few genes to decipher the phylogenetic relationships of sparids. Here, we conducted a phylogenomic attempt to resolve the position of the family using five recently available Sparidae gene-sets and 26 available fish proteomes from species with a sequenced genome, to ensure higher quality of the predicted genes. A thorough phylogenomic analysis suggested that Tetraodontiformes (puffer fish, sunfish) are the closest relatives to sparids than all other groups used, a finding that contradicts our previous phylogenomic analysis that proposed the yellow croaker and the european seabass as closest taxa of sparids. By analytically comparing the methodologies applied in both cases, we show that this discordance is not due to different orthology assignment algorithms; on the contrary, we prove that it is caused by the increased taxon sampling of the present study, outlining the great importance of this aspect in phylogenomic analyses in general.

evolutionary biology↗