bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Narumoto, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Narumoto, J..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Continuous Neural Correlates of Imbalanced Reinforcement Learning in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Healthy Individuals

AimObsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by imbalanced reinforcement learning. This study investigated neural correlates of this imbalance by examining resting-state functional connectivity (rs-fMRI) in non-medicated OCD patients and healthy controls (HCs) exhibiting varying degrees of memory trace imbalance. MethodsWe employed network-based statistics (NBS), suitable for identifying network-level alterations of rs-fMRI data from 49 OCD patients and 53 HCs (Core Discovery Dataset: Core-DS) to identify a significant network. We validated this network in an independent dataset of 10 OCD patients and 18 HCs (Independent Validation Dataset: IndV-DS). Additionally, we compared functional connectivity in the identified network between subgroups of HCs with imbalanced (OCD-like) and balanced learning profiles (Extension Dataset: Ext-DS; n=10 each). ResultsNBS identified an OCD network with increased connectivity in OCD patients (padjusted = 0.022), comprising regions in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), parietal cortex, retrosplenial cortex, and hippocampal formation. This networks increased connectivity in OCD patients was replicated in IndV-DS (p = 0.0027). Importantly, imbalanced HCs showed a significant increase in functional connectivity, particularly between the DLPFC and presubiculum, in the identified OCD network, compared to balanced HCs (p = 0.0051, padjusted = 0.066). ConclusionIncreased functional connectivity in the OCD network, especially between the DLPFC and presubiculum, is present in both OCD patients and a subgroup of HCs with learning imbalances. These findings provide evidence for a continuous neural basis of imbalanced reinforcement learning, suggesting a continuum of traits associated with OCD between patients and "healthy" individuals.

neuroscience↗

Computational Mechanisms of Neuroimaging Biomarkers Uncovered by Multicenter Resting-State fMRI Connectivity Variation Profile

Resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) is increasingly used to develop biomarkers for psychiatric disorders. Despite progress, development of the reliable and practical FC biomarker remains an unmet goal, particularly one that is clinically predictive at the individual level with generalizability, robustness, and accuracy. In this study, we propose a new approach to profile each connectivity from diverse perspective, encompassing not only disorder-related differences but also disorder-unrelated variations attributed to individual difference, within-subject across-runs, imaging protocol, and scanner factors. By leveraging over 1500 runs of 10-minute resting-state data from 84 traveling-subjects across 29 sites and 900 participants of the case-control study with three psychiatric disorders, the disorder-related and disorder-unrelated FC variations were estimated for each individual FC. Using the FC profile information, we evaluated the effects of the disorder-related and disorder-unrelated variations on the output of the multi-connectivity biomarker trained with ensemble sparse classifiers and generalizable to the multicenter data. Our analysis revealed hierarchical variations in individual functional connectivity, ranging from within-subject across-run variations, individual differences, disease effects, inter-scanner discrepancies, and protocol differences, which were drastically inverted by the sparse machine-learning algorithm. We found this inversion mainly attributed to suppression of both individual difference and within-subject across-runs variations relative to the disorder-related difference by weighted-averaging of the selected FCs and ensemble computing. This comprehensive approach will provide an analytical tool to delineate future directions for developing reliable individual-level biomarkers.

neuroscience↗

Trace Imbalance in Reinforcement and Punishment Systems Can Mis-reinforce Implicit Choices Leading to Anxiety

We may view most of our daily activities as rational action selections; however, we sometimes reinforce maladaptive behaviors despite having explicit environmental knowledge. In this study, we model obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms as implicitly learned maladaptive behaviors. Simulations in the reinforcement learning framework show that agents implicitly learn to respond to intrusive thoughts when the memory trace signal for past actions decays differently for positive and negative prediction errors. Moreover, this model extends our understanding of therapeutic effects of behavioral therapy in OCD. Using empirical data, we confirm that patients with OCD show extremely imbalanced traces, which are normalized by serotonin enhancers. We find that healthy participants also vary in their obsessive-compulsive tendencies, consistent with the degree of imbalanced traces. These behavioral characteristics can be generalized to variations in the healthy population beyond the spectrum of clinical phenotypes.

neuroscience↗

Harmonization of resting-state functional MRI data across multiple imaging sites via the separation of site differences into sampling bias and measurement bias

When collecting large neuroimaging data associated with psychiatric disorders, images must be acquired from multiple sites because of the limited capacity of a single site. However, site differences represent the greatest barrier when acquiring multi-site neuroimaging data. We utilized a traveling-subject dataset in conjunction with a multi-site, multi-disorder dataset to demonstrate that site differences are composed of biological sampling bias and engineering measurement bias. Effects on resting-state functional MRI connectivity because of both bias types were greater than or equal to those because of psychiatric disorders. Furthermore, our findings indicated that each site can sample only from among a subpopulation of participants. This result suggests that it is essential to collect large neuroimaging data from as many sites as possible to appropriately estimate the distribution of the grand population. Finally, we developed a novel harmonization method that removed only the measurement bias by using traveling-subject dataset and achieved the reduction of the measurement bias by 29% and the improvement of the signal to noise ratios by 40%.

neuroscience↗

A common neural network among state, trait, and pathological anxiety from whole-brain functional connectivity

Anxiety is one of the most common mental states of humans. Although it drives us to avoid frightening situations and to achieve our goals, it may also impose significant suffering and burden if it becomes extreme. Because we experience anxiety in a variety of forms, previous studies investigated neural substrates of anxiety in a variety of ways. These studies revealed that individuals with high state, trait, or pathological anxiety showed altered neural substrates. However, no studies have directly investigated whether the different dimensions of anxiety share a common neural substrate, despite its theoretical and practical importance. Here, we investigated a neural network of anxiety shared by different dimensions of anxiety in a unified analytical framework using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We analyzed different datasets in a single scale, which was defined by an anxiety-related neural network derived from whole brain. Through the fMRI task for provoking anxiety, we found a common neural network of state anxiety across participants (1,638 trials obtained from 10 participants). Then, using the resting-state fMRI in combination with the participants trait anxiety scale (879 participants from the Human Connectome Project), we demonstrated that trait anxiety also shared the same neural network as state anxiety. Furthermore, the common neural network between state and trait anxiety could detect patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, which is characterized by pathological anxiety-driven behaviors (174 participants from multi-site datasets). Our findings provide direct evidence that different dimensions of anxiety are not completely independent but have a substantial biological inter-relationship. Our results also provide a biologically defined dimension of anxiety, which may promote further investigation of various human characteristics, including psychiatric disorders, from the perspective of anxiety.

neuroscience↗