bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Nao, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Nao, N..

14 recordsLinked to original sources

Evolution of BA.2.86 to JN.1 reveals functional changes in non-structural viral proteins are required for fitness of SARS-CoV-2

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is still circulating among humans, leading to the continuous evolution. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron JN.1 evolved from a distinct SARS-CoV-2 lineage, BA.2.86, spread rapidly worldwide. It is unclear why BA.2.86 did not become dominant and was quickly replaced by JN.1, which possesses one amino acid substitution in the spike protein (S:L455S) and two in the non-spike proteins NSP6 and ORF7b (NSP6:R252K and ORF7b:F19L) compared to BA.2.86. Here, we utilized recombinant viruses to elucidate the impact of these mutations on the virological characteristics of JN.1. We found that the mutation in the spike attenuated viral replication, but the non-spike mutations enhanced replication, suggesting the mutations in the non-spike proteins compensate for the one in the spike to improve viral fitness, as the mutations in the spike contribute to further immune evasion. Our findings suggest that functional changes in both the spike and non-spike proteins are necessary in the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 to enable evasion of adaptive immunity within the human population while sustaining replication. IMPORTANCEBecause the spike protein is strongly associated with certain virological properties of SARS-CoV-2, such as immune evasion and infectivity, most previous studies on SARS-CoV-2 variants have focused on spike protein mutations. However, the non-spike proteins also contribute to infectivity, as observed throughout the evolution of Omicron subvariants. In this study, we demonstrate a "trade-off" strategy in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron JN.1 in which the reduced infectivity caused by spike mutation is compensated by non-spike mutations. Our results provide insight into the evolutionary scenario of the emerging virus in the human population.

microbiology↗

Involvement of Hepatitis B Core-Related Antigen in Viral Genome Integration in Patients With Prior Hepatitis B Virus Infection

BackgroundThe incidence of non-B non-C hepatocellular carcinoma (NBNC-HCC), which is negative for hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis C virus antibodies, is on the rise. Relatively high numbers of NBNC-HCC patients are hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) positive, suggesting that previous HBV infection may play a role in NBNC-HCC development, though the exact mechanisms are unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether HBV genomes are integrated into the host genome of HBcAb-positive NBNC-HCC cases and how these integrations may contribute to cancer development and progression. MethodsHBV detection PCR using HBV-specific primers on DNA extracted from HBcAb-positive NBNC-HCC tissue samples was performed. Positive samples were further examined for HBV integration sites using viral DNA-capture sequencing. Additionally, hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) serum levels were measured to assess whether they could be predictive for HBV detection PCR results. ResultsAmong 90 HBcAb-positive NBNC-HCC samples, HBV genome amplification was detected in 18 samples, and elevated HBcrAg levels were associated with the HBV detection PCR results. Seventeen of these samples exhibited HBV integration. The HBV genome was integrated near the TERT gene in 7 samples, resulting in significantly increased TERT mRNA levels; in the KMT2B gene (2 samples); and downstream of LOC441666 (2 samples). ConclusionThe integration sites we identified in our samples have been previously reported in HBV-related HCC, suggesting that HBV integration may also contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis in HBcAb-positive NBNC-HCC. Furthermore, HBcrAg could serve as a potential, noninvasive marker for detecting HBV integration in these cases.

microbiology↗

Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 variant

In late 2023, a lineage of SARS-CoV-2 emerged and was named the BA.2.86 variant. BA.2.86 is phylogenetically distinct from other Omicron sublineages identified so far, displaying an accumulation of over 30 amino acid mutations in its spike protein. Here, we performed multiscale investigations to reveal the virological characteristics of the BA.2.86 variant. Our epidemic dynamics modeling suggested that the relative reproduction number of BA.2.86 is significantly higher than that of EG.5.1. Experimental studies showed that four clinically-available antivirals were effective against BA.2.86. Although the fusogenicity of BA.2.86 spike is similar to that of the parental BA.2 spike, the intrinsic pathogenicity of BA.2.86 in hamsters was significantly lower than that of BA.2. Since the growth kinetics of BA.2.86 is significantly lower than that of BA.2 in both in vitro cell cultures and in vivo, it is suggested that the attenuated pathogenicity of BA.2.86 is due to its decreased replication capacity.

microbiology↗

Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron EG.5.1 variant

In middle-late 2023, a sublineage of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB, EG.5.1 (a progeny of XBB.1.9.2), is spreading rapidly around the world. Here, we performed multiscale investigations to reveal virological features of newly emerging EG.5.1 variant. Our phylogenetic-epidemic dynamics modeling suggested that two hallmark substitutions of EG.5.1, S:F456L and ORF9b:I5T, are critical to the increased viral fitness. Experimental investigations addressing the growth kinetics, sensitivity to clinically available antivirals, fusogenicity and pathogenicity of EG.5.1 suggested that the virological features of EG.5.1 is comparable to that of XBB.1.5. However, the cryo-electron microscopy reveals the structural difference between the spike proteins of EG.5.1 and XBB.1.5. We further assessed the impact of ORF9b:I5T on viral features, but it was almost negligible at least in our experimental setup. Our multiscale investigations provide the knowledge for understanding of the evolution trait of newly emerging pathogenic viruses in the human population.

microbiology↗

Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 XBB.1.5 variant

Circulation of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB has resulted in the emergence of XBB.1.5, a new Variant of Interest. Our phylogenetic analysis suggests that XBB.1.5 evolved from XBB.1 by acquiring the F486P spike (S) mutation, subsequent to the acquisition of a nonsense mutation in ORF8. Neutralization assays showed similar abilities of immune escape between XBB.1.5 and XBB.1. We determined the structural basis for the interaction between human ACE2 and the S protein of XBB.1.5, showing similar overall structures between the S proteins of XBB.1 and XBB.1.5. The intrinsic pathogenicity of XBB.1.5 in hamsters is lower than that of XBB.1. Importantly, we found that the ORF8 nonsense mutation of XBB.1.5 resulted in impairment of MHC expression. In vivo experiments using recombinant viruses revealed that the XBB.1.5 mutations are involved with reduced virulence of XBB.1.5. Together, these data suggest that the mutations in ORF8 and S could enhance spreading of XBB.1.5 in humans.

microbiology↗

Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 XBB variant derived from recombination of two Omicron subvariants

In late 2022, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants have highly diversified, and XBB is spreading rapidly around the world. Our phylogenetic analyses suggested that XBB emerged by recombination of two co-circulating BA.2 lineages, BJ.1 and BM.1.1.1 (a progeny of BA.2.75), during the summer of 2022 around India. In vitro experiments revealed that XBB is the most profoundly resistant variant to BA.2/5 breakthrough infection sera ever and is more fusogenic than BA.2.75. Notably, the recombination breakpoint is located in the receptor-binding domain of spike, and each region of recombined spike conferred immune evasion and augmented fusogenicity to the XBB spike. Finally, the intrinsic pathogenicity of XBB in hamsters is comparable to or even lower than that of BA.2.75. Our multiscale investigation provided evidence suggesting that XBB is the first documented SARS-CoV-2 variant increasing its fitness through recombination rather than single mutations.

microbiology↗

Convergent evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants leading to the emergence of BQ.1.1 variant

In late 2022, although the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants have highly diversified, some lineages have convergently acquired amino acid substitutions at five critical residues in the spike protein. Here, we illuminated the evolutionary rules underlying the convergent evolution of Omicron subvariants and the properties of one of the latest lineages of concern, BQ.1.1. Our phylogenetic and epidemic dynamics analyses suggest that Omicron subvariants independently increased their viral fitness by acquiring the convergent substitutions. Particularly, BQ.1.1, which harbors all five convergent substitutions, shows the highest fitness among the viruses investigated. Neutralization assays show that BQ.1.1 is more resistant to breakthrough BA.2/5 infection sera than BA.5. The BQ.1.1 spike exhibits enhanced binding affinity to human ACE2 receptor and greater fusogenicity than the BA.5 spike. However, the pathogenicity of BQ.1.1 in hamsters is comparable to or even lower than that of BA.5. Our multiscale investigations provide insights into the evolutionary trajectory of Omicron subvariants.

microbiology↗

Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2.75

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2.75 emerged in May 2022. BA.2.75 is a BA.2 descendant but is phylogenetically different from BA.5, the currently predominant BA.2 descendant. Here, we showed that the effective reproduction number of BA.2.75 is greater than that of BA.5. While the sensitivity of BA.2.75 to vaccination- and BA.1/2 breakthrough infection-induced humoral immunity was comparable to that of BA.2, the immunogenicity of BA.2.75 was different from that of BA.2 and BA.5. Three clinically-available antiviral drugs were effective against BA.2.75. BA.2.75 spike exhibited a profound higher affinity to human ACE2 than BA.2 and BA.5 spikes. The fusogenicity, growth efficiency in human alveolar epithelial cells, and intrinsic pathogenicity in hamsters of BA.2.75 were comparable to those of BA.5 but were greater than those of BA.2. Our multiscale investigations suggest that BA.2.75 acquired virological properties independently of BA.5, and the potential risk of BA.2.75 to global health is greater than that of BA.5.

microbiology↗

Comparative pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants including BA.1, BA.2, and BA.5

Unremitting emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants imposes us to continuous control measurement. Given the rapid spread, new Omicron subvariant named BA.5 is urgently required for characterization. Here we analyzed BA.5 with the other Omicron variants BA.1, BA.2, and ancestral B.1.1 comprehensively. Although in vitro growth kinetics of BA.5 is comparable among the Omicron subvariants, BA.5 become much more fusogenic than BA.1 and BA.2. The airway-on-a-chip analysis showed that the ability of BA.5 to disrupt the respiratory epithelial and endothelial barriers is enhanced among Omicron subvariants. Furthermore, in our hamster model, in vivo replication of BA.5 is comparable with that of the other Omicrons and less than that of the ancestral B.1.1. Importantly, inflammatory response against BA.5 is strong compared with BA.1 and BA.2. Our data suggest that BA.5 is still low pathogenic compared to ancestral strain but evolved to induce enhanced inflammation when compared to prior Omicron subvariants.

microbiology↗

Diagnosis and early prediction of lymphoma using high-throughput clonality analysis of bovine leukemia virus-infected cells

Bovine leukemia virus (BLV), a retrovirus, infects into B cells of ruminants and causes aggressive leukemia or lymphoma in cattle, enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL). Clonal expansion of BLV-infected cells is a promising marker for early detection and diagnosis of EBL. Recently, we developed rapid amplification of the integration site without interference by genomic DNA contamination (RAISING) and CLOVA, a software to analyze clonality. RAISING-CLOVA could assess the risk of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma development in human T-cell leukemia virus-I-infected individuals through its clonality analysis. Thus, we herein examined the performance of RAISING-CLOVA for the clonality analysis of BLV-infected cells and conducted a comprehensive clonality analysis by RAISING-CLOVA in EBL and non-EBL cattle. RAISING-CLOVA successfully distinguished EBL from non-EBL cattle with high sensitivity and specificity. A longitudinal clonality analysis in BLV-infected sheep, an EBL model, also confirmed the effectiveness of BLV clonality analysis with RAISING-CLOVA for early detection of EBL development. Therefore, our study emphasizes the usefulness of RAISING-CLOVA as a routine clinical test for monitoring virus-related cancers.

microbiology↗

Virological characteristics of the novel SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants including BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5

After the global spread of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 lineage, some BA.2-related variants that acquire mutations in the L452 residue of spike protein, such as BA.2.9.1 and BA.2.13 (L452M), BA.2.12.1 (L452Q), and BA.2.11, BA.4 and BA.5 (L452R), emerged in multiple countries. Our statistical analysis showed that the effective reproduction numbers of these L452R/M/Q-bearing BA.2-related Omicron variants are greater than that of the original BA.2. Neutralization experiments revealed that the immunity induced by BA.1 and BA.2 infections is less effective against BA.4/5. Cell culture experiments showed that BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/5 replicate more efficiently in human alveolar epithelial cells than BA.2, and particularly, BA.4/5 is more fusogenic than BA.2. Furthermore, infection experiments using hamsters indicated that BA.4/5 is more pathogenic than BA.2. Altogether, our multiscale investigations suggest that the risk of L452R/M/Q-bearing BA.2-related Omicron variants, particularly BA.4 and BA.5, to global health is potentially greater than that of original BA.2. HighlightsO_LISpike L452R/Q/M mutations increase the effective reproduction number of BA.2 C_LIO_LIBA.4/5 is resistant to the immunity induced by BA.1 and BA.2 infections C_LIO_LIBA.2.12.1 and BA.4/5 more efficiently spread in human lung cells than BA.2 C_LIO_LIBA.4/5 is more pathogenic than BA.2 in hamsters C_LI

microbiology↗

Virological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2 variant

Soon after the emergence and global spread of a new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron lineage, BA.1 (ref1, 2), another Omicron lineage, BA.2, has initiated outcompeting BA.1. Statistical analysis shows that the effective reproduction number of BA.2 is 1.4-fold higher than that of BA.1. Neutralisation experiments show that the vaccine-induced humoral immunity fails to function against BA.2 like BA.1, and notably, the antigenicity of BA.2 is different from BA.1. Cell culture experiments show that BA.2 is more replicative in human nasal epithelial cells and more fusogenic than BA.1. Furthermore, infection experiments using hamsters show that BA.2 is more pathogenic than BA.1. Our multiscale investigations suggest that the risk of BA.2 for global health is potentially higher than that of BA.1.

microbiology↗

The inhaled steroid ciclesonide blocks SARS-CoV-2 RNA replication by targeting viral replication-transcription complex in culture cells

We screened steroid compounds to obtain a drug expected to block host inflammatory responses and MERS-CoV replication. Ciclesonide, an inhaled corticosteroid, suppressed replication of MERS-CoV and other coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2, the cause of COVID-19, in cultured cells. The effective concentration (EC90) of ciclesonide for SARS-CoV-2 in differentiated human bronchial tracheal epithelial cells was 0.55 M. Ciclesonide inhibited formation of double membrane vesicles, which anchor the viral replication-transcription complex in cells. Eight consecutive passages of 43 SARS-CoV-2 isolates in the presence of ciclesonide generated 15 resistant mutants harboring single amino acid substitutions in non-structural protein 3 (nsp3) or nsp4. Of note, ciclesonide still suppressed replication of all these mutants by 90% or more, suggesting that these mutants cannot completely overcome ciclesonide blockade. These observations indicate that the suppressive effect of ciclesonide on viral replication is specific to coronaviruses, highlighting it as a candidate drug for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. ImportanceThe outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, the cause of COVID-19, is ongoing. To identify the effective antiviral agents to combat the disease is urgently needed. In the present study, we found that an inhaled corticosteroid, ciclesonide suppresses replication of coronaviruses, including beta-coronaviruses (MHV-2, MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2) and an alpha-coronavirus (HCoV-229E) in cultured cells. The inhaled ciclesonide is safe; indeed, it can be administered to infants at high concentrations. Thus, ciclesonide is expected to be a broad-spectrum antiviral drug that is effective against many members of the coronavirus family. It could be prescribed for the treatment of MERS, and COVID-19.

microbiology↗

The inhaled corticosteroid ciclesonide blocks coronavirus RNA replication by targeting viral NSP15

Steroid compounds, which are expected to have dual functions in blocking host inflammation and MERS-CoV replication, were screened from a chemical library. Within this library, ciclesonide, an inhaled corticosteroid, suppressed human coronavirus replication in cultured cells, but did not suppress replication of respiratory syncytial virus or influenza virus. The effective concentration of ciclesonide to block SARS-CoV-2 (the cause of COVID-19) replication (EC90) was 6.3 M. After the eleventh consecutive MERS-CoV passage in the presence of ciclesonide, a resistant mutation was generated, which resulted in an amino acid substitution (A25V) in nonstructural protein (NSP) 15, as identified using reverse genetics. A recombinant virus with the mutation was also resistant to ciclesonide suppression of viral replication. These observations suggest that the effect of ciclesonide was specific to coronavirus, suggesting this is a candidate drug for treatment of patients suffering MERS or COVID-19.

microbiology↗