bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Nadeau, J. H.

Publications and source records attributed to Nadeau, J. H..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Pituitary Tumor Transforming Gene 1 orchestrates gene regulatory variation in mouse ventral midbrain during aging

BackgroundDopaminergic neurons in the midbrain are of particular interest due to their role in diseases such as Parkinsons disease and schizophrenia. Genetic variation between individuals can affect the integrity and function of dopaminergic neurons but the DNA variants and molecular cascades modulating dopaminergic neurons and other cells types of ventral midbrain remain poorly defined. Three genetically diverse inbred mouse strains -- C57BL/6J, A/J, and DBA/2J -- differ significantly in their genomes (~7 million variants), motor and cognitive behavior, and susceptibility to neurotoxins. ResultsTo further dissect the underlying molecular networks responsible for these variable phenotypes, we generated RNA-seq and ChIP-seq data from ventral midbrains of the 3 mouse strains. We defined 1000-1200 transcripts that are differentially expressed among them. These widespread differences may be due to altered activity or expression of upstream transcription factors. Interestingly, transcription factors were significantly underrepresented among the differentially expressed genes, and only one TF, Pttg1, showed significant differences among all strains. The changes in Pttg1 expression were accompanied by consistent alterations in histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation at Pttg1 transcription start site. The ventral midbrain transcriptome of three-month-old C57BL/6J congenic Pttg1-/- mutants was only modestly altered, but shifted towards that of A/J and DBA/2J in nine-month-old mice. Principle component analysis identified the genes underlying the transcriptome shift and deconvolution of these bulk RNA-seq changes using midbrain single cell RNA-seq data suggested that the changes were occurring in several different cell types, including neurons, oligodendrocytes, and astrocytes. ConclusionTaken together, our results show that Pttg1 contributes to gene regulatory variation between mouse strains and influences mouse midbrain transcriptome during aging.

genomics↗

Do gametes woo? Evidence for non-random unions at fertilization

A fundamental tenet of inheritance in sexually reproducing organisms such as humans and laboratory mice is that genetic variants combine randomly at fertilization, thereby ensuring a balanced and statistically predictable representation of inherited variants in each generation. This principle is encapsulated in Mendels First Law. But exceptions are known. With transmission ratio distortion (TRD), particular alleles are preferentially transmitted to offspring without reducing reproductive productivity. Preferential transmission usually occurs in one sex but not both and is not known to require interactions between gametes at fertilization. We recently discovered, in our work in mice and in other reports in the literature, instances where any of 12 mutant genes bias fertilization, with either too many or too few heterozygotes and too few homozygotes, depending on the mutant gene and on dietary conditions. Although such deviations are usually attributed to embryonic lethality of the under-represented genotypes, the evidence is more consistent with genetically-determined preferences for specific combinations of egg and sperm at fertilization that results in genotype bias without embryo loss. These genes and diets could bias fertilization in at least three not mutually exclusive ways. They could trigger a reversal in the order of meiotic divisions during oogenesis so that the genetics of fertilizing sperm elicits preferential chromatid segregation, thereby dictating which allele remains in the egg versus the 2nd polar body. Bias could also result from genetic- and diet-induced anomalies in polyamine metabolism on which function of haploid gametes normally depends. Finally, secreted and cell-surface factors in female reproductive organs could control access of sperm to eggs based on their genetic content. This unexpected discovery of genetically-biased fertilization in mice could yield insights about the molecular and cellular interactions between sperm and egg at fertilization, with implications for our understanding of inheritance, reproduction, population genetics, and medical genetics.

genetics↗