Biology subjects

Munoz-Gomez, S. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Munoz-Gomez, S. A..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Single-cell genomics reveals the divergent mitochondrial genomes of Retaria (Foraminifera and Radiolaria)

Mitochondria originated from an ancient bacterial endosymbiont that underwent reductive evolution by gene loss and endosymbiont gene transfer to the nuclear genome. The diversity of mitochondrial genomes published to date has revealed that gene loss and transfer processes are ongoing in many lineages. Most well-studied eukaryotic lineages are represented in mitochondrial genome databases, except for the superphylum Retaria--the lineage comprising Foraminifera and Radiolaria. Using single-cell approaches, we present two complete mitochondrial genomes of Foraminifera and two near-complete mitochondrial genomes of radiolarians. We report the complete coding content of an additional 14 foram species. We show that foraminiferan and radiolarian mitochondrial genomes encode a nearly fully overlapping but reduced mitochondrial gene complement compared to other sequenced rhizarians. In contrast to animals and fungi, many protists encode a diverse set of proteins on their mitochondrial genomes, including several ribosomal genes; however, some aerobic eukaryotic lineages (euglenids, myzozoans, and chlamydomonas-like algae) have reduced mitochondrial gene content and lack all ribosomal genes. Similar to these reduced outliers, we show that retarian mitochondrial genomes lack ribosomal protein and tRNA genes, contain truncated and divergent small and large rRNA genes, and encode only 14-15 protein-coding genes, including nad1, 3, 4, 4L, 5, 7, cob, cox1, 2, 3, atp1, 6, and 9, with forams and radiolarians additionally encoding nad2 and nad6, respectively. In radiolarian mitogenomes, a non-canonical genetic code was identified in which all three stop codons encode amino acids. Collectively, these results add to our understanding of mitochondrial genome evolution and fill in one of the last major gaps in mitochondrial sequence databases.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2022

The development of intracytoplasmic membranes in alphaproteobacteria involves the conserved mitochondrial crista-developing Mic60 protein

Mitochondrial cristae expand the surface area of respiratory membranes and ultimately allow for the evolutionary scaling of respiration with cell volume across eukaryotes. The discovery of Mic60 homologs among alphaproteobacteria, the closest extant relatives of mitochondria, suggested that cristae might have evolved from bacterial intracytoplasmic membranes (ICMs). Here, we investigated the predicted structure and function of alphaproteobacterial Mic60, and a protein encoded by an adjacent gene Orf52, in two distantly related purple alphaproteobacteria, Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Rhodopseudomonas palustris. In addition, we assessed the potential physical interactors of Mic60 and Orf52 in R. sphaeroides. We show that the three -helices of mitochondrial Mic60s mitofilin domain, as well as its adjacent membrane-binding amphipathic helix, are present in alphaproteobacterial Mic60. The disruption of Mic60 and Orf52 caused photoheterotrophic growth defects, which are most severe under low light conditions, and both their disruption and overexpression led to enlarged ICMs in both studied alphaproteobacteria. We also found that alphaproteobacterial Mic60 physically interacts with BamA, the homolog of Sam50, one of the main physical interactors of eukaryotic Mic60. This interaction, responsible for making contact sites at mitochondrial envelopes, has been conserved in modern alphaproteobacteria despite more than a billion years of evolutionary divergence. Our results suggest a role for Mic60 in photosynthetic ICM development and contact site formation at alphaproteobacterial envelopes. Overall, we provide support for the hypothesis that mitochondrial cristae evolved from alphaproteobacterial ICMs, and therefore have improved our understanding of the nature of the mitochondrial ancestor.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2021

The role of mitochondrial energetics in the origin and diversification of eukaryotes

The origin of eukaryotic cell size and complexity is thought by some to have required an energy excess provided by mitochondria, whereas others claim that mitochondria provide no energetic boost to eukaryotes. Recent observations show that energy demand scales continuously and linearly with cell volume across both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and thus suggest that eukaryotes do not have an increased energetic capacity over prokaryotes. However, amounts of respiratory membranes and ATP synthases scale super-linearly with cell surface area. Furthermore, the energetic consequences of the contrasting genomic architectures between prokaryotes and eukaryotes have yet to be precisely quantified. Here, we investigated (1) potential factors that affect the cell volumes at which prokaryotes become surface area-constrained, (2) the amount of energy that is divested to increasing amounts of DNA due to the contrasting genomic architectures of prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and (3) the costs and benefits of respiring symbionts for a host cell. Our analyses suggest that prokaryotes are not necessarily constrained by their cell surfaces at cell volumes of 100-103 m3, and that the genomic architecture of eukaryotes is only slightly advantageous at genomes sizes of 106-107 bp. This suggests that eukaryotes may have first evolved without the need for mitochondria as these ranges hypothetically encompass the Last Eukaryote Common Ancestor and its proto-eukaryotic ancestors. At these slightly larger cell volumes, a host cell may also have derived a greater advantage (lower cost) from harboring a population of ATP-producing symbionts. However, our analyses also show that increasingly larger and fast-dividing prokaryotes would have a shortage of surface area devoted to respiration and would disproportionally divest more energy to DNA synthesis at larger genome sizes. We thus argue that, even though mitochondria may not have been required by the first eukaryotes, the successful diversification of eukaryotes into larger and faster-growing cells was ultimately contingent upon the origin of mitochondria. SignificanceThere has been a lot of theorizing about the evolution of eukaryotes from prokaryotes, but no consensus seems to be on the horizon. Our quantitative analyses on the required amount of respiratory membrane, and the amount of energy diverted to DNA synthesis, by both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, suggest that mitochondria provided rather small advantages to the first eukaryotes, but were advantageous for the macro-evolutionary diversification of eukaryotes. This conclusion provides a middle road in the debate between those that claim that the origin of eukaryotes required a massive energy boost provided by mitochondria, and those that argue that the origin of mitochondria did not represent a quantum leap in energetic advantages to eukaryotes.

evolutionary biology↗