Biology subjects

Munding, E. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Munding, E. M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

A complete human pancreatic cancer genome

Cancer genome sequencing is essential for understanding tumor evolution and advancing precision medicine.1 However, reference gaps and germline variants obscure detection of small and large somatic variants and methylation in repetitive regions.1-3 It is common for tumor cells to gain or lose chromosome arms due to somatic structural changes that occur inside highly repetitive satellite DNA sequences in the centromeres.4 To identify the full spectrum of somatic variants, including complex rearrangements, we construct and curate near-complete, haplotype-resolved assemblies of the most recent common ancestor of an early-passage broadly-consented hypodiploid pancreatic cancer cell line and matched normal tissues. The tumor assembly completely recapitulates all 35 tumor chromosomes observed with karyotyping, with multiple translocation-induced hybrid chromosomes. The hybrid chromosomes contain putative functional dicentric and fused centromeres, nested foldback inversions causing 14 breakpoints with a haplotype switch in a single event, and centromeric satellite tandem duplications up to 136 kbp. Direct comparison of tumor and normal assembly haplotypes uncovers >7,000 variants altering >1 Mbp of sequence in repetitive regions that have been hidden by reference gaps and germline variants. 44 % of somatic small variants change representation because they alter germline variants on GRCh38, impacting mutational signatures and kataegis/omikli clusters. Most somatic LINE insertions originate from two hypomethylated non-reference germline LINE insertions, highlighting their impact on insertion mutation burden. These assemblies demonstrate that centromeric, acrocentric, and telomeric regions conventionally excluded from analysis harbor extensive somatic and epigenetic changes. Resolving complete tumor genomes enables a deeper understanding of cancer structural plasticity and the endpoints of breakage-fusion-bridge cycles. These assembled, curated paired normal-tumor benchmarks will serve as a critical foundation for developing future algorithms to characterize the most intractable regions of cancer genomes.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2019

Erosion of the Epigenetic Landscape and Loss of Cellular Identity as a Cause of Aging in Mammals

All living things experience entropy, manifested as a loss of inherited genetic and epigenetic information over time. As budding yeast cells age, epigenetic changes result in a loss of cell identity and sterility, both hallmarks of yeast aging. In mammals, epigenetic information is also lost over time, but what causes it to be lost and whether it is a cause or a consequence of aging is not known. Here we show that the transient induction of genomic instability, in the form of a low number of non-mutagenic DNA breaks, accelerates many of the chromatin and tissue changes seen during aging, including the erosion of the epigenetic landscape, a loss of cellular identity, advancement of the DNA methylation clock and cellular senescence. These data support a model in which a loss of epigenetic information is a cause of aging in mammals.\n\nOne Sentence SummaryThe act of repairing DNA breaks induces chromatin reorganization and a loss of cell identity that may contribute to mammalian aging

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Rapidly evolving protointrons in Saccharomyces genomes revealed by a hungry spliceosome

Introns are a prevalent feature of eukaryotic genomes, yet their origins and contributions to genome function and evolution remain mysterious. In budding yeast, repression of the highly transcribed intron-containing ribosomal protein genes (RPGs) globally increases splicing of non-RPG transcripts through reduced competition for the spliceosome. We show that under these \"hungry spliceosome\" conditions, splicing occurs at more than 150 previously unannotated locations we call protointrons that do not overlap known introns. Protointrons use a less constrained set of splice sites and branchpoints than standard introns, including in one case AT-AC in place of GT-AG. Protointrons are not conserved in all closely related species, suggesting that most are not under selection. Some are found in non-coding RNAs (e. g. CUTs and SUTs), where they may contribute to the creation of new genes. Others are found across boundaries between noncoding and coding sequences, or within coding sequences, where they offer pathways to the creation of new protein variants, or new regulatory controls for existing genes. We define protointrons as (1) nonconserved intron-like sequences that are (2) infrequently spliced, and importantly (3) are not currently understood to contribute to gene expression or regulation in the way that standard introns function. A very few protointrons in S. cerevisiae challenge this classification by their increased splicing frequency and potential function, consistent with the proposed evolutionary process of \"intronization\", whereby new standard introns are created. This snapshot of intron evolution highlights the important role of the spliceosome in the expansion of transcribed genomic sequence space, providing a pathway for the rare events that may lead to the birth of new eukaryotic genes and the refinement of existing gene function.\n\nAuthor SummaryThe protein coding information in eukaryotic genes is broken by intervening sequences called introns that are removed from RNA during transcription by a large protein-RNA complex called the spliceosome. Where introns come from and how the spliceosome contributes to genome evolution are open questions. In this study, we find more than 150 new places in the yeast genome that are recognized by the spliceosome and spliced out as introns. Since they appear to have arisen very recently in evolution by sequence drift and do not appear to contribute to gene expression or its regulation, we call these protointrons. Protointrons are found in both protein-coding and non-coding RNAs and are not efficiently removed by the splicing machinery. Although most protointrons are not conserved, a few are spliced more efficiently, and are located where they might begin to play functional roles in gene expression, as predicted by the proposed process of intronization. The challenge now is to understand how spontaneously appearing splicing events like protointrons might contribute to the creation of new genes, new genetic controls, and new protein isoforms as genomes evolve.

genomics↗