bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Moyne, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Moyne, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Scream's roughness confers a privileged access to the brain during sleep

During sleep, recognizing threatening signals is crucial to know when to wake up and when to continue vital sleep functions. Screaming is perhaps the most salient and efficient signal for communicating danger at a distance or in conditions of limited visibility. Beyond the intensity or the pitch of the sound, rapid modulations of sound pressure in the so-called roughness range (i.e. 30-150 Hz) are particularly powerful in capturing attention and accelerating reactions. Roughness is an acoustic feature that characterizes alarm signals such as screams. However, whether rough sounds are also processed in a privileged manner during sleep is unknown. We tested this hypothesis by stimulating sleeping human participants with low-intensity screams and neutral calls. We found that screams trigger more reliable and better time-locked responses in wakefulness and NREM sleep. In addition, screams boosted sleep spindles, suggesting elevated stimulus salience. The increase in sleep spindle power was linearly proportional to the roughness of vocalizations, but not to their pitch. These findings demonstrate that, even at low sound intensity, screams roughness conveys stimulus relevance and enhances processing in both the waking and sleeping states. Preserved differential neural responses based on stimulus salience may ensure adaptive reactions -and ultimately survival- in a state where the brain is mostly disconnected from external inputs.

neuroscience↗

Targeting the fronto-parietal network using multifocal personalized transcranial alternating current stimulation to enhance motor sequence learning in healthy older adults

BackgroundHealthy older adults show a decrease in motor learning capacity as well as in working memory (WM) performance. WM has been suggested to be involved in motor learning processes, such as sequence learning. Correlational evidence has shown the involvement of the fronto-parietal network (FPN), a network underlying WM processes, in motor sequence learning. However, causal evidence is currently lacking. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) studies have focused so far predominantly on motor related areas to enhance motor sequence learning while areas associated with more cognitive aspects of motor learning have not yet been addressed. HypothesisIn this study, we aim to provide causal evidence for the involvement of WM processes and the underlying FPN in successful motor sequence learning by using a theta transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) paradigm targeting the FPN during motor sequence learning. MethodsIn a cohort of 20 healthy older adults, we applied bifocal tACS in the theta range to the FPN during a sequence learning task. With the use of a double-blind, cross-over design, we tested the efficacy of active compared with sham stimulation. Two versions of the motor task were used: one with high and one with low WM load, to explore the efficacy of stimulation on tasks differing in WM demand. Additionally, the effects of stimulation on WM performance were addressed using an N-back task. The tACS frequency was personalized by means of EEG measuring the individual theta peak frequency during the N-back task. ResultsThe application of personalized theta tACS to the FPN improved performance on the motor sequence learning task with high WM load (p <.001), but not with low WM load. Active stimulation significantly improved both speed (p <.001), and accuracy (p =.03) during the task with high WM load. In addition, the stimulation paradigm improved performance on the N-back task for the 2-back task (p = .013), but not for 1-back and 3-back. ConclusionMotor sequence learning can be enhanced with the use of personalized bifocal theta tACS to the FPN when WM load is high. This indicates that the efficacy of this stimulation paradigm is dependent on the cognitive demand during the learning task and provides further causal evidence for the critical involvement of WM processes and the FPN in motor sequence learning in healthy older adults. These findings open new exciting possibilities to counteract the age-related decline in motor learning capacity and WM performance.

neuroscience↗