bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Mostovoy, Y.

Publications and source records attributed to Mostovoy, Y..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The 22q11 low copy repeats are characterized by unprecedented size and structure variability

AbstractLow copy repeats (LCRs) are recognized as a significant source of genomic instability, driving genome variability and evolution. The chromosome 22 LCRs (LCR22s) are amongst the most complex regions in the genome and their structure remains unresolved. These LCR22s mediate non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) leading to the 22q11 deletion syndrome (22q11DS), causing the most frequent genomic disorder. Using fiber FISH optical mapping, we have de novo assembled the LCR22s in 33 cell lines. We observed a high level of variation in LCR22 structures, including 26 different haplotypes of LCR22A with alleles ranging from 250 Kb to over 2,000 Kb. An additional four haplotypes were detected using Bionano mapping. Further, Bionano maps generated from 154 individuals from different populations suggested significantly different LCR22 haplotype frequencies between populations. Furthermore, haplotype analysis in nine 22q11DS patients resulted in the localization of the NAHR site to a 160 Kb paralog between LCR22A and -D in seven patients and to a 31 Kb region in two individuals with a rearrangement between LCR22A and -B.. This 31 Kb region contains a palindromic AT-rich repeat known to be a driver of chromosomal rearrangements. Our study highlights an unprecedented level of polymorphism in the structure of LCR22s, which are likely still evolving. We present the most comprehensive map of LCR22 variation to date, paving the way towards investigating the role of LCR variation as a driver of 22q11 rearrangements and the phenotypic variability in 22q11DS patients as well as in the general population.

genomics

Evaluating the quality of the 1000 Genomes Project data

Data from the 1000 Genomes project is quite often used as a reference for human genomic analysis. However, its accuracy needs to be assessed to understand the quality of predictions made using this reference. We present here an assessment of the genotype, phasing, and imputation accuracy data in the 1000 Genomes project. We compare the phased haplotype calls from the 1000 Genomes project to experimentally phased haplotypes for 28 of the same individuals sequenced using the 10X Genomics platform. We observe that phasing and imputation for rare variants are unreliable, which likely reflects the limited sample size of the 1000 Genomes project data. Further, it appears that using a population specific reference panel does not improve the accuracy of imputation over using the entire 1000 Genomes data set as a reference panel. We also note that the error rates and trends depend on the choice of definition of error, and hence any error reporting needs to take these definitions into account.

genomics