bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Morrow, E. H.

Publications and source records attributed to Morrow, E. H..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Sexual selection does not predict long-term population trends in birds

Sexual selection is a major evolutionary force, yet its demographic consequences remain unclear. While experimental studies often report positive effects of sexual selection on traits linked to population performance, comparative studies often find null or negative associations with population persistence. One explanation for this discrepancy is that the demographic consequences of sexual selection depend on ecological context, particularly variation in mortality and fecundity. Here, we used six decades of abundance data and test whether sexual selection predicts population trends across 738 bird species from Europe and North America. We quantify sexual selection using complementary proxies capturing different components of sexual selection: mating system, sexual dichromatism, sexual size dimorphism and relative testes mass. We further assess whether the effect of sexual selection in population trends is mediated by mortality and fecundity. Across all proxies, we found no evidence that sexual selection is associated with population trends. This result is consistent across continents and robust to variation in mortality and fecundity. Our findings suggest that, despite its central role in shaping phenotypic evolution, sexual selection does not translate into consistent effects on long-term population trends at macroecological scales. More broadly, these results highlight a potential disconnect between evolutionary processes and population dynamics.

evolutionary biology↗

Feminisation of complex traits in Drosophila melanogaster via female-limited X chromosome evolution

A handful of studies have investigated sexually antagonistic constraints on obtaining sex-specific fitness optima, though exclusively through male-genome-limited evolution experiments. In this paper, we established a female-limited X chromosome evolution experiment, where we used an X chromosome balancer to enforce the inheritance of the X chromosome through the matriline, thus removing exposure to male selective constraints. This approach eliminates the effects of sexually antagonistic selection on the X chromosome, permitting evolution towards a single sex-specific optimum. After multiple generations of selection, we found strong evidence that body size and development time had moved towards a female-specific optimum, whereas reproductive fitness and locomotion activity remained unchanged. The changes in body size and development time are consistent with previous results, and suggest that the X chromosome is enriched for sexually antagonistic genetic variation controlling these traits. The lack of change in reproductive fitness and locomotion activity could be due to a number of mutually non-exclusive explanations, including a lack of sexually antagonistic variance on the X chromosome or confounding effects of the use of the balancer chromosome. This study is the first to employ female-genome-limited selection and adds to the understanding of the complexity of sexually antagonistic genetic variation.

evolutionary biology↗

Sexually antagonistic coevolution between the sex chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster

Antagonistic interactions between the sexes are important drivers of evolutionary divergence. Interlocus sexual conflict is generally described as a conflict between alleles at two interacting loci whose identity and genomic location are arbitrary. Here we build on previous theory and suggest that when these two loci are located on the sex chromosomes it can lead to cycles of antagonistic coevolution between them, and therefore between the sexes. We tested this hypothesis by performing experimental crosses using Drosophila melanogaster in which we reciprocally exchanged the sex chromosomes between five wild-type populations in a round-robin design. Disrupting putatively coevolved sex chromosome pairs resulted in increased male reproductive success in 16 out of 20 experimental populations (10 of which were significant), but also resulted in lower offspring egg-to-adult viability that affected both male and female fitness. After 25 generations of experimental evolution these sexually antagonistic fitness effects appeared to have been resolved. To help formalise our hypothesis, we developed population genetic models of antagonistic coevolution using fitness expressions based on our empirical results. Our models support the conclusion that antagonistic coevolution between the sex chromosomes is plausible under the fitness effects observed in our experiments. Together, our results lend both empirical and theoretical support to the idea that a cycle of antagonistic coevolution can occur between sex chromosomes and illustrates how this process may drive genetic and phenotypic divergence between populations. SignificanceSex chromosomes are not only involved in genetic sex determination - they are also important factors in sexual conflict and speciation. Here, using a combination of experiments and population genetic models, we show that the sex chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster can coevolve antagonistically. We found that swapping sex chromosomes between five Drosophila melanogaster populations increased male fitness at the cost of reduced offspring survival. After 25 generations, the increase had disappeared, consistent with the completion of a cycle of antagonistic coevolution. Using parameter values based on these empirical data, our models show that antagonistic coevolution between the sex chromosomes is a biologically plausible explanation for the results. Thus, our results point to a potentially important path to speciation through sexual conflict.

evolutionary biology↗

The microevolutionary response to male-limited X-chromosome evolution in Drosophila melanogaster reflects macroevolutionary patterns

Due to its hemizygous inheritance and role in sex determination, the X chromosome is expected to play an important role in the evolution of sexual dimorphism, and to be enriched for sexually antagonistic genetic variation. By forcing the X chromosome to only be expressed in males over >40 generations, we changed the selection pressures on the X to become similar to those experienced by the Y. This releases the X from any constraints arising from selection in females, and should lead to specialization for male fitness, which could occur either via direct effects of X-linked loci or trans-regulation of autosomal loci by the X. We found evidence of masculinization via upregulation of male-benefit sexually antagonistic genes, and downregulation of X-linked female benefit genes. Interestingly, we could detect evidence of microevolutionary changes consistent with previously documented macroevolutionary patterns, such as changes in expression consistent with previously established patterns of sexual dimorphism, an increase in the expression of metabolic genes related to mitonuclear conflict, and evidence that dosage compensation effects can be rapidly altered. These results confirm the importance of the X in the evolution of sexual dimorphism and as a source for sexually antagonistic genetic variation, and demonstrate that experimental evolution can be a fruitful method for testing theories of sex chromosome evolution.

evolutionary biology↗

Sexual antagonism exerts evolutionarily persistent genomic constraints on sexual differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster

The evolution of sexual dimorphism is constrained by a shared genome, leading to sexual antagonism where different alleles at given loci are favoured by selection in males and females. Despite its wide taxonomic incidence, we know little about the identity, genomic location and evolutionary dynamics of antagonistic genetic variants. To address these deficits, we use sex-specific fitness data from 202 fully sequenced hemiclonal D. melanogaster fly lines to perform a genome-wide association study of sexual antagonism. We identify ~230 chromosomal clusters of candidate antagonistic SNPs. In contradiction to classic theory, we find no clear evidence that the X chromosome is a hotspot for sexually antagonistic variation. Characterising antagonistic SNPs functionally, we find a large excess of missense variants but little enrichment in terms of gene function. We also assess the evolutionary persistence of antagonistic variants by examining extant polymorphism in wild D. melanogaster populations. Remarkably, antagonistic variants are associated with multiple signatures of balancing selection across the D. melanogaster distribution range, indicating widespread and evolutionarily persistent (>10,000 years) genomic constraints. Based on our results, we propose that antagonistic variation accumulates due to constraints on the resolution of sexual conflict over protein coding sequences, thus contributing to the long-term maintenance of heritable fitness variation.

evolutionary biology↗

Whole genome resequencing of a laboratory-adapted Drosophila melanogaster population sample

As part of a study into the molecular genetics of sexually dimorphic complex traits, we used next-generation sequencing to obtain data on genomic variation in an outbred laboratory-adapted fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) population. We successfully resequenced the whole genome of 2 females from the Berkeley reference line (BDGP6/dm6), and 220 hemiclonal females that were heterozygous for the same reference line genome, and a unique haplotype from the outbred base population (LHM). The use of a static and known genetic background enabled us to obtain sequences from whole-genome phased haplotypes. We used a BWA-Picard-GATK pipeline for mapping sequence reads to the dm6 reference genome assembly, at a median depth-of coverage of 31X, and have made the resulting data publicly-available in the NCBI Short Read Archive (BioProject PRJNA282591). Haplotype Caller discovered and genotyped 1,726,931 genetic variants (SNPs and indels, <200bp). Additionally, we used GenomeStrip/2.0 to discover and genotype 167 large structural variants (1-100Kb in size). Sequence data and quality-filtered genotype data are publicly-available at NCBI (Short Read Archive, dbSNP and dbVar). We have also released the unfiltered genotype data, and the code and logs for data processing, summary statistics, and graphs, via the research data repository, Zenodo, (https://zenodo.org/, Sussex Drosophila Sequencing community).

genomics↗