bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Morichetti, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Morichetti, M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Climate change threatens the productivity stability of Italian forests

Mediterranean forests are emerging as one of the clearest hotspots of climate-change impacts, where rapid warming and increasingly severe droughts and heatwaves are pushing forest ecosystems toward their physiological and functional limits. These pressures threaten productivity, carbon dynamics, ecosystem stability, and the services forests provide. In this context, a process-based forest ecosystem model was used to assess climate-driven changes in carbon dynamics and productivity stability across Italian forests within the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP) framework. 5135 plots were simulated, corresponding to ~80% of the field plots included in the second Italian National Forest Inventory (INFI). Model simulations were first evaluated against independent observations of gross primary production (GPP) from satellite-based products and forest carbon variables from the third INFI. Forest dynamics from 2015 to 2100 were simulated under three CMIP6-based emission scenarios (SSP1-2.6, SSP3-7.0, and SSP5-8.5) using two climate forcings (GFDL-ESM4 and UKESM1-0-LL). Future responses were assessed for GPP, aboveground biomass, growing stock volume, and carbon stocks, while variability in GPP was quantified using the coefficient of variation as an indicator of forest stability. Results show that the model reproduced the main spatial and temporal patterns of forest productivity and carbon stocks. Future projections revealed strong spatial heterogeneity and increasing divergence among scenarios after mid-century. GPP showed the earliest and strongest response to climate change, with mountain forests generally maintaining or increasing productivity and exhibiting greater stability, whereas coastal forests showed pronounced productivity declines and increasing variability, particularly under higher-emission scenarios and more extreme climate forcing. In contrast, carbon stocks generally continued to increase throughout the century, although carbon accumulation progressively slowed toward the end of the century, particularly under higher-emission scenarios.

ecology↗

Natural and planted forests differ in the mechanisms regulating productivity and stability

Forest productivity and stability underpin ecosystem functioning and services, yet whether the drivers and mechanisms regulating these properties differ between natural and planted forests at large spatial scales remains unclear. Using data from 2,389 forest plots across China and a novel analytical framework, we systematically compared productivity and stability between natural and planted forests and identified their dominant drivers and underlying mechanisms across 38 biotic, structural, climatic, and edaphic variables. We found that natural forests were 14% more productive and 34% more stable than planted forests, although these differences varied across ecoregions and stand development stages. Productivity in natural forests was primarily driven by functional diversity and functional traits, supporting the niche complementarity and mass-ratio hypotheses, whereas nitrogen availability emerged as the dominant regulator of productivity in planted forests. Likewise, stability shifted from diversity-related regulation in natural forests to stronger abiotic control in planted forests, while functional diversity remained a key stabilizing mechanism in both forest types, supporting the insurance hypothesis. We also found that planted forests were more sensitive to hydroclimatic variability, indicating greater vulnerability to drought. Our findings reveal a fundamental shift in the mechanisms regulating forest productivity and stability from diversity-mediated control in natural forests to stronger abiotic regulation in planted forests, highlighting the importance of integrating biodiversity conservation and nitrogen management to sustain forest productivity and stability under future climate change.

ecology↗

Stand Age and Climate Change Effects on Carbon Increments and Stock Dynamics

Carbon assimilation and wood production are influenced by environmental conditions and endogenous factors, such as species auto-ecology, age, and hierarchical position within the forest structure. Disentangling the intricate relationships between those factors is more pressing than ever due to climate changes pressure. We employed the 3D-CMCC-FEM model to simulate undisturbed forests of different ages under four climate change scenarios (plus one no climate change) from five Earth System Models. In this context, carbon stocks and increment were simulated via total car-bon woody stocks and mean annual increment, which depends mainly on climate trends. We find greater differences among different age cohorts under the same scenario than in different climate scenarios under the same age class. Increasing temperature and changes in precipitation patterns led to a decline in above-ground biomass in spruce stands, espe-cially in the older age classes. On the contrary, the results show that beech forests at DK-Sor will maintain and even increase C-storage rates under most RCP scenarios. Scots pine forests show an intermediate behavior with a stable stock capacity over time and in different scenarios but with decreasing mean volume annual increment. These results confirm current observations worldwide that indicate a stronger climate-related decline in conifers forests than in broadleaves.

ecology↗

Changes in Mean Seasonal Carbon Cycle Due to Climate Change

Through photosynthesis, forests absorb annually large amounts of atmospheric CO2. However, they also release CO2 back through respiration. These two, opposite in sign, large fluxes determine, much of the carbon that is stored or released back to the atmosphere. The mean seasonal cycle (MSC) is an interesting metric that associates phenology and carbon (C) partitioning-allocation analysis within forest stands. Here we applied the 3D-CMCC-FEM model and analyzed its capability to represent the main C-fluxes, by validating the model against observed data, questioning if the sink/source mean seasonality is influenced under two scenarios of climate change, in five contrasting European forest sites. We found the model has, under current climate conditions, robust predictive abilities in estimating NEE. Model results also predict a consistent reduction of the forests capabilities to act as a C-sink under climate change and stand-ageing at all sites. Such a reduction is predicted despite the number of annual days of C-sink in evergreen forests increasing over the years, indicating a consistent downward trend. Similarly, deciduous forests, despite maintaining a relatively stable number of C-sink days throughout the year and over the century, show a reduction in their overall annual C-sink capacity. Overall, both types of forests at all sites show a consistent reduction in their future mitigating potential.

ecology↗