bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Monroe, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Monroe, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Changes in maternal blood and placental lipidomic profile in obesity and gestational diabetes: Evidence for sexual dimorphism

IntroductionObesity and gestational diabetes (GDM) are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and program the offspring for cardiometabolic disease in a sexually dimorphic manner. The placenta transfers lipids to the fetus and uses these substrates to support its own metabolism impacting the amount of substrate available to the growing fetus. MethodsWe collected maternal plasma and placental villous tissue following elective cesarean section at term from women who were lean (pre-pregnancy BMI 18.5-24.9), obese (BMI>30) and type A2 GDM (matched to obese BMI) with male or female fetus (n=4 each group). Lipids were extracted and fatty acid composition of different lipid classes were analyzed by LC-MS/MS analysis. Significant changes in GDM vs obese, GDM vs lean, and obese vs lean were determined using t-test with a Tukey correction set at p<0.05. ResultsIn placental samples 436 lipids were identified, among which 85 showed significant changes. Of note only in male placentas significant decreases in C22:6 - docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in phosphatidylcholine (PC) and triglyceride lipid species were seen when comparing tissue from GDM women to lean. In maternal plasma we observed no effect of obesity. GDM or fetal sex. ConclusionThis is the first study assessing fatty acid composition of lipids in matched maternal plasma and placental tissue from lean, obese, and GDM women stratified by fetal sex. It highlights how GDM affects distribution of fatty acids in lipid classes changes in a sexually dimorphic manner in the placenta.

molecular biology↗

Herpetologists' Conservation Research Focus Drives Their Intentions to Participate in Future Public Engagement

Public Engagement with Science (PES) is a popular topic in the science community due to general concerns about public support for science, attitudes toward science, and changes in scientific funding requirements. PES may be especially relevant in conservation disciplines as the public plays an important role in conservation practice. Herpetofauna specifically stand to benefit, as PES activities can help improve attitudes and conservation behavior of participants toward uncharismatic species. We assessed the current scope of herpetologists PES activities and investigated factors associated with their participation in PES. We used a closed-ended question survey distributed via the listservs of four American herpetological organizations. Herpetologists intentions to engage at least 10 hours in the next 12 months significantly differed between herpetologists with high and low conservation research focuses, but hours of engagement in the past 12 months was not significantly different among these groups. Despite most responding herpetologists having limited formal training, time, resources, and institutional support, many participated in a variety of PES activities, often utilizing partnerships and their own resources. Sampled herpetologists rarely evaluated their PES activities or considered publishing about their engagement activities. Some respondents expressed unease with the idea of message framing. Respondents were interested in evaluation training and providing accessible opportunities, and grant funds were the most likely interventions to increase herpetologists participation in PES. These results provide reference data and insight into the public engagement practices and needs of practicing herpetologists and conservation scientists. Author statementWe informed participants of their rights and protections as approved by University of Florida IRB201800258. None of the authors have conflicts of interest related to this research. Funding for the research was provided by a Roger Conant Grant from the Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles (SSAR). SSAR had no role in interpretation of data, the writing of the report, or the decision to submit the article for publication.

scientific communication and education↗