bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Mims, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Mims, N..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

FLASH radiotherapy spares lymphocytes in tumor-draining lymph nodes and increases infiltration of immune cells in tumors

Radiotherapy (RT) delivered at conventional dose rates (CONV) can both stimulate antitumor immune responses and inhibit these immune responses by depleting circulating lymphocytes. Given the observed normal tissue sparing associated with ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) RT, we hypothesized that FLASH RT may protect lymphocytes while increasing the immunogenicity of cancer cells. We irradiated cancer cell lines in vitro with FLASH RT or CONV RT and assessed immunogenic mRNA and protein expression. Both HPV-positive cell lines MEER and TC-1 showed upregulation of Calr, Hmgb1, and cGAS-STING family members after FLASH RT but not after CONV RT in vitro. To assess changes in lymphocyte populations, we irradiated murine mEER tumors in syngeneic C57BL/6 mice with 27 Gy in 3 fractions of FLASH RT or CONV RT. In mice bearing FLASH irradiated tumors, tumor-draining lymph nodes contained greater numbers of CD8+ T cells (FLASH 1.7x104 vs 0.8x104 CONV; P<0.001) and CD4+ T cells (FLASH 2.3x104 vs CONV 1.2x104; P<0.001) after irradiation. FLASH RT was associated with increased numbers of activated CD44+CD62LloCD8+ and CD4+ lymphocytes. In irradiated tumors, FLASH RT was associated with increased CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, increased PD1 expression on these lymphocytes and increased PDL1 expression on macrophages. Compared with CONV RT, FLASH RT spared activated T cells in tumor-draining lymph nodes and in tumors but increased checkpoint inhibitor expression in tumors. These results suggest that FLASH RT may enhance antitumor immune responses by maintaining the immunogenic effects of RT while preserving lymphocyte numbers, which may be augmented with immune checkpoint blockade. SignificanceRadiation-induced lymphopenia is associated with poorer survival outcomes. New treatment approaches, like FLASH radiation therapy (FLASH RT), which reduce lymphopenia and enhance the antitumor response, could potentially lead to better outcomes for cancer patients.

cancer biology↗

Mitochondrial Responses to Conventional and Ultra-high Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiation

PurposeUltra-high dose rate (>40 Gy/s, FLASH) radiation therapy (RT) provides equivalent tumor control while reducing normal tissue toxicity relative to conventional dose rate (CONV) RT. However, the mechanisms underlying the observed FLASH effect are unknown. We hypothesized that the preservation of mitochondrial integrity in nontumorigenic cells by FLASH RT could be a key factor in reducing normal tissue toxicity and improving overall treatment outcomes. MethodsWe examined mitochondrial health and function after CONV and FLASH in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo through assays of metabolic flux, mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS), mitochondrial DNA damage and copy number, mitochondrial morphology, and tumor growth and survival. ResultsIn in vitro assays, murine pancreatic cancer (PDAC) cells showed evidence of equal mitochondrial damage in response to CONV and FLASH, but nontumorigenic pancreatic cells were spared by FLASH. These results were recapitulated ex vivo, and mice treated with FLASH showed higher response rates and longer survival time than mice treated with CONV in an in vivo tumor model. ConclusionsCollectively, these results suggest that FLASH spares mitochondrial function in nontumorigenic cells, but not in PDAC cells, relative to CONV. The preservation of mitochondrial integrity in nontumorigenic cells may be a key mechanism underlying the reduced normal tissue toxicity observed with FLASH RT.

cancer biology↗

Modernizing histopathological analysis: a fully automated workflow for the digital image analysis of the intestinal microcolony survival assay

BackgroundManual analysis of histopathological images is often not only time-consuming and painstaking but also prone to error from subjective evaluation criteria and human error. To address these issues, we created a fully automated workflow to enumerate jejunal crypts in a microcolony survival assay to quantify gastrointestinal damage from radiation. Methods and MaterialsAfter abdominal irradiation of mice, jejuna were obtained and prepared on histopathologic slides, and crypts were counted manually by trained individuals. The automated workflow (AW) involved obtaining images of jejunal slices from the irradiated mice, followed by cropping and normalizing the individual slice images for resolution and color; using deep learning-based semantic image segmentation to detect crypts on each slice; using a tailored algorithm to enumerate the crypts; and tabulating and saving the results. A graphical user interface (GUI) was developed to allow users to review and correct the automated results. ResultsCrypts counted manually exhibited a mean absolute percent deviation of (34 {+/-} 26)% between individuals vs the group mean across counters, which was reduced to (11 {+/-} 6)% across the 3 most-experienced counters. The AW processed a sample image dataset from 60 mice in a few hours and required only a few minutes of active user effort. AW counts deviated from experts mean counts by (10 {+/-} 8)%. The AW thereby allowed rapid, automated evaluation of the microcolony survival assay with accuracy comparable to that of trained experts and without subjective inter-observer variation. HighlightsO_LIWe fully automated the digital image analysis of a microcolony survival assay C_LIO_LIAnalyzing 540 images takes a few hours with only minutes of active user effort C_LIO_LIThe automated workflow (AW) is just as accurate as trained experts C_LIO_LIThe AW eliminates subjective inter-observer variation and human error C_LIO_LIHuman review possible with built-in graphical user interface C_LI Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=81 SRC="FIGDIR/small/627578v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (40K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4d178eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1457d39org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@120644eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1996992_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

cancer biology↗

Redefining FLASH RT: the impact of mean dose rate and dose per pulse in the gastrointestinal tract

BackgroundThe understanding of how varying radiation beam parameter settings affect the induction and magnitude of the FLASH effect remains limited. PurposeWe sought to evaluate how the magnitude of radiation-induced gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (RIGIT) depends on the interplay between mean dose rate (MDR) and dose per pulse (DPP). MethodsC57BL/6J mice were subjected to total abdominal irradiation (11-14 Gy single fraction) under conventional irradiation (low DPP and low MDR, CONV) and various combinations of DPP and MDR up to ultra-high-dose-rate (UHDR) beam conditions. The effects of DPP were evaluated for DPPs of 1-6 Gy while the total dose and MDR were kept constant; the effects of MDR were evaluated for the range 0.3- 1440 Gy/s while the total dose and DPP were kept constant. RIGIT was quantified in non-tumor-bearing mice through the regenerating crypt assay and survival assessment. Tumor response was evaluated through tumor growth delay. ResultsWithin each tested total dose using a constant MDR (>100 Gy/s), increasing DPP led to better sparing of regenerating crypts, with a more prominent effect seen at 12 and 14 Gy TAI. However, at fixed DPPs >4 Gy, similar sparing of crypts was demonstrated irrespective of MDR (from 0.3 to 1440 Gy/s). At a fixed high DPP of 4.7 Gy, survival was equivalently improved relative to CONV for all MDRs from 0.3 Gy/s to 104 Gy/s, but at a lower DPP of 0.93 Gy, increasing MDR produced a greater survival effect. We also confirmed that high DPP, regardless of MDR, produced the same magnitude of tumor growth delay relative to CONV using a clinically relevant melanoma mouse model. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the strong influence that the beam parameter settings have on the magnitude of the FLASH effect. Both high DPP and UHDR appeared independently sufficient to produce FLASH sparing of GI toxicity, while isoeffective tumor response was maintained across all conditions.

cancer biology↗