Mi, Z. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2020

DReSS: A difference measurement based on reachability between state spaces of Boolean networks

Researches on dynamical features of biological systems are mostly based on fixed network structure. However, both biological factors and data factors can cause structural perturbations to biological regulatory networks. There are researches focus on the influence of such structural perturbations to the systems dynamical features. Reachability is one of the most important dynamical features, which describe whether a state can automatically evolve into another state. However, there is still no method can quantitively describe the reachability differences of two state spaces caused by structural perturbations. DReSS, Difference based on Reachability between State Spaces, is proposed in this research to solve this problem. First, basic properties of DReSS such as non-negativity, symmetry and subadditivity are proved based on the definition. And two more indexes, diagDReSS and iDReSS are proposed based on the definition of DReSS. Second, typical examples like DReSS = 0 or 1 are shown to explain the meaning of DReSS family, and the differences between DReSS and traditional graph distance are shown based on the calculation steps of DReSS. Finally, differences of DReSS distribution between real biological regulatory network and random networks are compared. Multiple interaction positions in real biological regulatory network show significant different DReSS value with those in random networks while none of them show significant different diagDReSS value, which illustrates that the structural perturbations tend to affect reachability inside and between attractor basins rather than to affect attractor set itself. Author summaryBoolean network is a kind of networks which is widely used to model biological regulatory systems. There are structural perturbations in biological systems based on both biological factors and data-related factors. We propose a measurement called DReSS to describe the difference between state spaces of Boolean networks, which can be used to evaluate the influence of specific structural perturbations of a network to its state space quantitively. We can use DReSS to detect the sensitive interactions in a regulatory network, where structural perturbations can influence its state space significantly. We proved properties of DReSS including non-negativity, symmetry and subadditivity, and gave examples to explain the meaning of some special DReSS values. Finally, we present an example of using DReSS to detect sensitive vertexes in yeast cell cycle regulatory network. DReSS can provide a new perspective on how different interactions affect the state space of a specific regulatory network differently.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2019

Advanced Whole Genome Sequencing Using a Complete PCR-free Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS) Workflow

BackgroundSystematic errors can be introduced from DNA amplification during massively parallel sequencing (MPS) library preparation and sequencing array formation. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-free genomic library preparation methods were previously shown to improve whole genome sequencing (WGS) quality on the Illumina platform, especially in calling insertions and deletions (InDels). We hypothesized that substantial InDel errors continue to be introduced by the remaining PCR step of DNA cluster generation. In addition to library preparation and sequencing, data analysis methods are also important for the accuracy of the output data.In recent years, several machine learning variant calling pipelines have emerged, which can correct the systematic errors from MPS and improve the data performance of variant calling. ResultsHere, PCR-free libraries were sequenced on the PCR-free DNBSEQ arrays from MGI Tech Co., Ltd. (referred to as MGI) to accomplish the first true PCR-free WGS which the whole process is truly not only PCR-free during library preparation but also PCR-free during sequencing. We demonstrated that PCR-based WGS libraries have significantly (about 5 times) more InDel errors than PCR-free libraries.Furthermore, PCR-free WGS libraries sequenced on the PCR-free DNBSEQ platform have up to 55% less InDel errors compared to the NovaSeq platform, confirming that DNA clusters contain PCR-generated errors.In addition, low coverage bias and less than 1% read duplication rate was reproducibly obtained in DNBSEQ PCR-free using either ultrasonic or enzymatic DNA fragmentation MGI kits combined with MGISEQ-2000. Meanwhile, variant calling performance (single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) F-score>99.94%, InDels F-score>99.6%) exceeded widely accepted standards using machine learning (ML) methods (DeepVariant or DNAscope). ConclusionsEnabled by the new PCR-free library preparation kits, ultra high-thoughput PCR-free sequencers and ML-based variant calling, true PCR-free DNBSEQ WGS provides a powerful solution for improving WGS accuracy while reducing cost and analysis time, thus facilitating future precision medicine, cohort studies, and large population genome projects.

genomics↗