bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Meyyappan, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Meyyappan, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Effects of Frontoparietal Theta tACS on Verbal Working Memory: Behavioral and Neurophysiological Analysis

Left-lateralized frontoparietal theta oscillations are thought to play an important role in verbal working memory. We causally tested this idea by stimulating the frontoparietal theta network at individual theta frequencies (4 to 8 Hz) during verbal working memory and observing the subsequent behavioral and neurophysiological effects. Weak electric currents were delivered via two 4x1 HD electrode arrays centered at F3 and P3. Three stimulation configurations, including in-phase, anti-phase, or sham, were tested on three different days in a cross-over design. On each test day, the subject underwent three experimental sessions: pre-, during- and post-stimulation sessions. In all sessions, the subject performed a Sternberg verbal working memory task with three levels of memory load (load 2, 4 and 6), imposing three levels of cognitive demand. Analyzing behavioral, EEG, and pupillometry data from the post-stimulation sessions, we report three results. First, in-phase stimulation improved task performance only in subjects with higher working memory capacity (WMC) and under higher memory load (load 6). Second, in-phase stimulation enhanced frontoparietal theta synchrony during working memory retention only in subjects with higher WMC under higher memory loads (load 4 and load 6), and the enhanced frontoparietal theta synchronization is mainly driven by enhanced frontal[->]parietal theta Granger causality. Third, the pupil diameter was not different irrespective of whether the preceding stimulation was in-phase, anti-phase, or sham. These findings suggest that theta tACS effects on verbal working memory were load- and subject-dependent, rooted in tACS-induced changes in frontoparietal network interactions, and not driven by changes in arousal levels.

neuroscience

Role of Inferior Frontal Junction (IFJ) in the Control of Feature vs Spatial Attention

Feature-based attention refers to preferential selection and processing of items and objects based on their non-spatial attributes such as color or shape. While it is intuitively an easier form of attention to relate to in our day to day lives, the neural mechanisms of feature-based attention are not well understood. Studies have long implicated the dorsal attention network as a key control system for voluntary spatial, feature and object-based attention. Recent studies have expanded on this model by focusing on the inferior frontal junction (IFJ), a region in the pre-frontal cortex to be the source of feature attention control, but not spatial attention control. However, the extent to which IFJ contributes to spatial attention remains a topic of debate. We investigated the role of IFJ in the control of feature versus spatial attention in a cued visual spatial (attend left or right) and feature attention (attend red or green) task using fMRI. Analyzing single-trial cue-evoked fMRI responses using univariate GLM and multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA), we observed the following. First, the univariate BOLD activation responses yielded no significant differences between feature and spatial cues. Second, MVPA analysis showed above chance level decoding in classifying feature attention (attend-red vs. attend-green) in both the left and right IFJ, whereas during spatial attention (attend-left vs. attend-right) decoding was at chance. Third, while the cue-evoked decoding accuracy was significant for both left and right IFJ during feature attention, target stimulus-evoked neural responses were not different. Importantly, only the connectivity patterns from the right IFJ was predictive of target-evoked activity in visual cortex (V4); this was true for both left and right V4. Finally, the strength of this connectivity between right IFJ and V4 (bilaterally) was found to be predictive of behavioral performance. These results support a model where the right IFJ plays a crucial role in top down control of feature but not spatial attention.

neuroscience