Biology subjects

Meredieu, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Meredieu, C..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

Higher aboveground carbon stocks in mixed-species planted forests than monocultures - a meta-analysis

Natural forest is declining globally as the area of planted forest increases. Planted forests are often monocultures, despite results suggesting that higher species richness improves ecosystem functioning and stability. To test if this is generally the case, we performed a meta-analysis of available results. We assessed aboveground carbon stocks in mixed-species planted forests vs (a) the average of constituent species monocultures, (b) the best constituent species monoculture, and (c) commercial species monocultures. We investigated whether any advantage of mixtures over monocultures was positively related to species richness, as well as potential mechanisms driving differences in carbon stocks between mixtures and monocultures. The meta-analysis dataset included 79 comparisons from 21 sites. Carbon stocks in mixed planted forests were higher than the average of stocks in monocultures of their constituent species, containing on average 70% more carbon. Mixed planted forests also out-performed commercial monocultures, containing on average 77% more carbon. There was c.25% more carbon in mixed planted forests relative to the best performing monocultures, although this difference was not statistically significant. Overyielding was highest in four-species mixtures (richness range 2-6 species). More data providing better coverage of richness and age gradients (study sites aged 3.5-28 years) is needed to increase confidence in these results. None of the potential mechanisms we examined (nitrogen-fixer present vs absent; native vs non-native/mixed origin; tree diversity experiment vs forestry plantation) consistently explained variation in the diversity effects. This suggests that our findings are driven by a combination of small (statistically insignificant) effects from these sources or further unidentified mechanisms or some combination of the two. We conclude that increasing tree species richness in planted forests can increase carbon stocks while bringing other potential benefits associated with diversification. However, implementation will depend on the balance of these benefits relative to the operational challenges and costs of diversification.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2021

Tree diversity effects on forest productivity: disentangling the effects of tree species addition vs. substitution

O_LIMixture effect on stand productivity is usually apprehended through a substitutive approach, whereby productivity in mixed stands is compared to productivity in monocultures, at equivalent stand density. This approach has proved that in many cases mixed stands perform better than monospecific forests, however, we do not yet have a solid theory about species behaviour in the mixture or even guidelines for combining species. The addition of a second tree species to an existing mono-specific stand has received much less consideration. Yet, this approach has the potential to separate the facilitation effect from the complementarity effect. C_LIO_LIWe compared the effect of tree species substitution vs. addition on the productivity of maritime pine and silver birch in a young tree diversity experiment implemented in 2008 in SW France. C_LIO_LISubstituting pines with birches to create two-species mixtures resulted in an increase of tree productivity at stand level beyond what was expected from monocultures (i.e., overyielding). In contrast, creating mixture through the addition of birches to pine stands had no effect on the maritime pine stand productivity (transgressive mixture effect not significant). This absence of effect is produced by two distinct density-dependence responses at an individual level. C_LIO_LIOur results allow clarifying the cases in which a mixed stand can be considered as an alternative to a monoculture of a productive species. In particular, the addition of a pioneer and soil low-demanding species during young developmental stages is a possibility to diversify the stand and potentially to increase ecosystem services without altering the productivity of the target species. C_LI

ecology↗

bioRxiv2021

Neither wood ash application nor phosphorus-fertilisation mitigated the negative effects of whole-tree harvesting on a temperate oligotrophic forest.

Background and AimsConcerns about climate change and carbon economy have prompted the promotion of alternative energy sources, including forest-based bioenergy. An evaluation of the environmental consequences of intensive harvests (stumps and roots, and also branches and foliage) for energy wood supply, and use of wood-ash recycling as a compensatory practice, helps in the evaluation of the use of forest biomass for energy production. MethodsWe made use of records from a split-plot experimental site crossing four different intensities of biomass harvesting (Stem-Only Harvest [SOH], Aboveground Additional Harvest [AAH], Belowground Additional Harvest [BAH], and Whole-Tree Harvest [WTH]) and three compensation methods (control [C], wood ash application [A] and phosphorus fertilisation [P]) to evaluate, in the 11-years-old stand (maritime pine: Pinus pinaster) that followed the biomass exports of the former stand, their effects on nutrient budgets, tree growth, soil fertility, chemical properties and soil carbon. This site is located in a forest on a poor soil, under a warm temperate climate (SW France). Key resultsDespite their low additional biomass exports (+10% for AAH to +34% for WTH), the non-conventional harvest practices exported much higher quantities of nutrients than the conventional SOH technique (for example +145% for N and K in WTH). Consequently, these treatments had negative effects on the soil nutritive status. Additional biomass harvests impacted the soil organic matter content, with negative effects on P-organic, soil cation exchange capacity, exchangeable Ca, and most extractible nutrients. However, data suggested that tree growth and foliage nutrient content had not yet been significantly impacted by harvest treatments, whereas tree nutritional status was improved by P-fertiliser or wood ash. As expected, we observed a positive effect of wood ash application on soil pH and nutrient content but, like additional harvests, wood ash application decreased the pool of soil organic carbon (~10% of the initial stock with ~7% of N-total losses). ConclusionsOverall, this factorial experiment showed that exporting more forest biomass due to the additional harvesting of tree canopies, stumps and roots had negative consequences on the ecosystem biogeochemistry. Additional harvests have aggravated the poverty of the already oligotrophic soil, and decreased the soil organic carbon content. Importantly, applying nutrients as fertiliser or wood ash did not compensate for all the negative impacts of biomass exports and the method of wood ash recycling in forests could even decrease the soil organic carbon.

ecology↗