Mensink, M. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2022

TNFR2 costimulation differentially impacts regulatory and conventional CD4+ T-cell metabolism

CD4+ conventional T cells (Tconvs) mediate adaptive immune responses, whereas regulatory T cells (Tregs) suppress those responses to safeguard the body from autoimmunity and inflammatory diseases. The opposing activities of Tconvs and Tregs depend on the stage of the immune response and their environment, with an orchestrating role for cytokine- and costimulatory receptors. Nutrient availability also impacts T-cell functionality via metabolic and biosynthetic processes that are largely unexplored. Many data argue that costimulation by Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 2 (TNFR2) favors support of Treg over Tconv responses and therefore TNFR2 is a key clinical target. Here, we review the pertinent literature on this topic and highlight the newly identified role of TNFR2 as a metabolic regulator for thymus-derived (t)Tregs. We present novel transcriptomic and metabolomic data that show the differential impact of TNFR2 on Tconv and tTreg gene expression and reveal distinct metabolic impact on both cell types.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2021

The relationship between human thymus-derived regulatory T cells, TGF-β-induced regulatory T cells and conventional CD4+ T cells as revealed by proteomics

The CD4+ regulatory T (Treg) cell lineage, as defined by FOXP3 expression, comprises thymus-derived (t)Treg cells and peripherally induced (p)Treg cells. In human, naive tTreg cells can be isolated from blood, while effector tTreg and pTreg cells cannot be purified reliably for lack of cell surface markers. As a model for Treg cells, studies often employ TGF-{beta}-induced (i)Treg cells generated from CD4+ conventional T (Tconv) cells in vitro. Here, we describe the relationship of iTreg cells to tTreg and Tconv cells, as optimally purified from human blood. Proteomic analysis revealed that each of these cell populations has a unique protein expression pattern before and after CD3/CD28-mediated activation. iTreg cells had limited overlap in protein expression with tTreg cells and exhibited markedly differential expression of proteins involved in signal transduction and metabolism. Whereas iTreg and Tconv cells responded strongly to CD3/CD28-mediated activation, tTreg cells showed a modest response, which reflects their adaptations in signal transduction pathways. As a benchmark, we used a previously defined proteomic signature that discerns ex vivo naive and effector Treg cells from Tconv cells and includes conserved Treg cell properties. This Treg cell core signature was largely absent in iTreg cells, as exemplified by STAT4 expression that may contribute to pro-inflammatory functions. In addition, we used a proteomic signature that distinguishes ex vivo effector Treg cells from Tconv cells and naive Treg cells. This effector Treg cell signature was partially present in iTreg cells, indicating that they do have protein expression features in common with ex vivo effector Treg cells. In conclusion, iTreg cells are distinct from tTreg cells and largely lack the Treg cell core proteomic signature, indicating that caution is warranted when using iTreg cells as a model for Treg cell populations found in vivo.

immunology↗