bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Meloni, C. Y.

Publications and source records attributed to Meloni, C. Y..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Linguistic evolution minimizes the amount of syntactic hierarchy in grammar

A core characteristic of language is the capacity for hierarchical syntax, but it remains debated to what extent languages favor hierarchical structure in their grammars, that is, the extent to which they favor hierarchical structures like "When driving, look ahead!" over concatenations like "You drive, you look ahead!". Through phylogenetic modeling of the grammars of clause combining in three extensive language families (Tupi-Guarani, Sino-Tibetan, and Indo-European), we find an overall bias towards minimizing hierarchy, with significant cultural variation. Our findings suggest that the computational and representational benefits of hierarchical structure tend not to be universally exploited in clause combinations, likely because they come with additional costs for learning. In consequence, the amount of hierarchy in language might differ from what is found in animal communication in a more graded way than commonly assumed.

evolutionary biology↗

Writing does not Impact the Evolution of Syntax

The acquisition of writing has a lasting effect on how languages are processed in the brain, raising the possibility that it also affects how they are used and evolve over time. A popular hypothesis is that writing specifically leads to increased use and evolution of complex hierarchical structures in language. While most case studies on individual languages have supported this, it remains unclear whether results scale to larger and more diverse sets of languages. Here we test the prediction for language use by modeling hierarchy depth and sentence length in Universal Dependencies corpora from 30 languages, and the prediction for language evolution by modeling the phylogenetic dynamics of structural asymmetry in clause combinations of 59 languages from three families. We found no effect of writing in either analysis. Hierarchy depth and sentence length do not demonstrably differ between spoken and written use of language, and the introduction of writing had no discernible effect on the evolution of clause combining in grammar. There is weak evidence for a decrease in variance after the introduction of writing in one family, possibly reflecting the impact of increased normativity. In conclusion, our findings challenge popular beliefs about hierarchy and suggest that the evolution of syntax is more driven by culturally variable ideas about style in linguistic expression than by the evolution of writing.

evolutionary biology↗

A Phylogenetic Perspective on the Syntax-Semantics Interface: A Case Study in Clause Linkage Constructions

We examine the syntax-semantics interface in clause linkage using a cross-linguistic sample of nearly 700 constructions from Indo-European, Sino-Tibetan, and Tupi-Guarani. To evaluate predictions from the Interclausal Relations Hierarchy, we model the phylogenetic dynamics of how semantic relations influence the degree of syntactic integration between clauses. The best performing model assumes an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process in each family and suggests only moderate and lineage-specific effects of semantics on syntax, challenging the universality of the Interclausal Relations Hierarchy. Furthermore, geographic proximity exerts only minimal effects, consistent with the notion that the syntax-semantics interface may be more resistant to contact effects than overtly signaled and transparent patterns in language. Together, our findings suggest that the syntax-semantics interface is less constrained in clause linkage than is commonly assumed in typology. They furthermore highlight the value of treating phylogeny as a dynamic evolutionary process, rather than as a static background structure.

evolutionary biology↗