bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Mello, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Mello, B..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

The Monophyly of Nycteria and Polychromophilus Parasites A Missing Piece in the Evolution of Malaria and Other Haemosporida

Haemosporida is a diverse order of vector-borne apicomplexan parasites infecting terrestrial vertebrates worldwide, including humans, but the evolutionary relationships among its genera remain unresolved. The phylogenetic placement of two bat-restricted genera, Nycteria and Polychromophilus, both of which lack erythrocytic schizogony, has varied across studies depending on taxon sampling and marker choice. To address this problem, an expanded dataset of near-complete mitochondrial (mtDNA) genomes together with nine nuclear loci were analyzed. Phylogenetic analyses of mtDNA recovered Nycteria and Polychromophilus as a strongly supported monophyletic clade. In contrast, analyses based only on the three mitochondrial coding genes (CDS) or a reduced nuclear dataset failed to recover their monophyly and showed low support and extensive topological conflict at deeper nodes. These results indicate that near-complete mitochondrial genomes recover phylogenetic signal that is not captured by reduced mitochondrial coding sequences or partial nuclear datasets. Molecular dating analyses further showed that divergence estimates for a putative Nycteria-Polychromophilus clade are compatible with the proposed times for bats diversification, and consistent with the broader haemosporidian timescale. When the Nycteria-Polychromophilus clade was incorporated as a calibration prior, divergence-time estimates became more precise without altering the overall evolutionary timeframe. Substantial mitochondrial gene-order rearrangements in a distinct Nycteria lineage were confirmed, highlighting structural divergence within this bat-associated group. In addition, heterogeneity in rates across mtDNA haemosporidian lineages was observed. Together, these findings support the existence of a distinct bat-associated clade whose deeper placement and evolutionary significance should be tested with broader phylogenomic sampling. Author SummaryMalaria parasites belong to a diverse group of organisms that infect many kinds of vertebrates, including birds, reptiles, and mammals (such as humans). Understanding how these parasites are related to each other is important for explaining how key biological traits have evolved. However, the relationships among major groups of haemosporidian parasites, including malaria parasites, remain unclear, particularly for those infecting bats. In this study, we focused on two groups of bat parasites, Nycteria and Polychromophilus, which share unusual biological features. The inferred evolutionary relationships of these two genera to other haemosporidians have been inconsistent across previous studies. By analyzing near-complete mitochondrial genomes, we found strong evidence that these two groups descended from a common evolutionary ancestor. In contrast, smaller datasets including nuclear genes failed to recover this relationship and produced conflicting results, suggesting that they lack sufficient information to resolve deep evolutionary relationships. We also found that this bat-associated lineage likely originated around the same time as early bats. In addition, we identified structural changes in the mitochondrial genome of one lineage, highlighting its evolutionary distinctiveness. Together, our results suggest that bats host a unique group of malaria parasites and demonstrate that more complete genetic data are essential for resolving their evolutionary history.

evolutionary biology↗

Reliable confidence intervals for RelTime estimates of evolutionary divergence times

Confidence intervals (CIs) depict the statistical uncertainty surrounding evolutionary divergence time estimates. They capture variance contributed by the finite number of sequences and sites used in the alignment, deviations of evolutionary rates from a strict molecular clock in a phylogeny, and uncertainty associated with clock calibrations. Reliable tests of biological hypotheses demand reliable CIs. However, current non-Bayesian methods may produce unreliable CIs because they do not incorporate rate variation among lineages and interactions among clock calibrations properly. Here, we present a new analytical method to calculate CIs of divergence times estimated using the RelTime method, along with an approach to utilize multiple calibration uncertainty densities in these analyses. Empirical data analyses showed that the new methods produce CIs that overlap with Bayesian highest posterior density (HPD) intervals. In the analysis of computer-simulated data, we found that RelTime CIs show excellent average coverage probabilities, i.e., the true time is contained within the CIs with a 95% probability. These developments will encourage broader use of computationally-efficient RelTime approach in molecular dating analyses and biological hypothesis testing.

evolutionary biology↗

Molecular dating for phylogenies containing a mix of populations and species

Concurrent molecular dating of population and species divergences is essential in many biological investigations, including phylogeography, phylodynamics, and species delimitation studies. Multiple sequence alignments used in these investigations frequently consist of both intra- and inter-species samples (mixed samples). As a result, the phylogenetic trees contain inter-species, inter-population, and within population divergences. To date these sequence divergences, Bayesian relaxed clock methods are often employed, but they assume the same tree prior for both inter- and intra-species branching processes and require specification of a clock model for branch rates (independent vs. autocorrelated rates models). We evaluated the impact of using the same tree prior on the Bayesian divergence time estimates by analyzing computer-simulated datasets. We also examined the effect of the assumption of independence of evolutionary rate variation among branches when the branch rates are autocorrelated. Bayesian approach with Skyline-coalescent tree priors generally produced excellent molecular dates, with some tree priors (e.g., Yule) performing the best when evolutionary rates were autocorrelated, and lineage sorting was incomplete. We compared the performance of the Bayesian approach with a non-Bayesian, the RelTime method, which does not require specification of a tree prior or selection of a clock model. We found that RelTime performed as well as the Bayesian approach, and when the clock model was mis-specified, RelTime performed slightly better. These results suggest that the computationally efficient RelTime approach is also suitable to analyze datasets containing both populations and species variation.

ecology↗

Deciphering the regulation mechanism in biochemical networks by a systems-biology approach

To decipher molecular mechanisms in biological systems from system-level input-output data is challenging especially for complex processes that involve interactions among multiple components. Here, we study regulation of the multi-domain (P1-5) histidine kinase CheA by the MCP chemoreceptors. We develop a network model to describe dynamics of the system treating the receptor complex with CheW and P3P4P5 domains of CheA as a regulated enzyme with two substrates, P1 and ATP. The model enables us to search the hypothesis space systematically for the simplest possible regulation mechanism consistent with the available data. Our analysis reveals a novel dual regulation mechanism wherein besides regulating ATP binding the receptor activity has to regulate one other key reaction, either P1 binding or phosphotransfer between P1 and ATP. Furthermore, our study shows that the receptors only control kinetic rates of the enzyme without changing its equilibrium properties. Predictions are made for future experiments to distinguish the remaining two dual-regulation mechanisms. This systems-biology approach of combining modeling and a large input-output data-set should be applicable for studying other complex biological processes.

systems biology↗

Multispecies coalescent analysis unravels the non-monophyly and controversial relationships of Hexapoda

With the increase in the availability of genomic data, sequences from different loci are usually concatenated in a supermatrix for phylogenetic inference. However, as an alternative to the supermatrix approach, several implementations of the multispecies coalescent (MSC) have been increasingly used in phylogenomic analyses due to their advantages in accommodating gene tree topological heterogeneity by taking account population-level processes. Moreover, the development of faster algorithms under the MSC is enabling the analysis of thousands of loci/taxa. Here, we explored the MSC approach for a phylogenomic dataset of Insecta. Even with the challenges posed by insects, due to large effective population sizes coupled with short deep internal branches, our MSC analysis could recover several orders and evolutionary relationships in agreement with current insect systematics. However, some phylogenetic relationships were not recovered by MSC methods. Most noticeable, a remiped crustacean was positioned within the Insecta. Additionally, the interordinal relationships within Polyneoptera and Neuropteroidea contradicted recent works, by suggesting the non-monophyly of Neuroptera. We notice, however, that these phylogenetic arrangements were also poorly supported by previous analyses and that they were sensitive to gene sampling.

evolutionary biology↗