Biology subjects

Mele, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Mele, M..

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

bioRxiv2019

Analysis of regulatory element evolution between human and mouse reveals a lack of cis-trans compensation

Gene expression differences between species are driven by both cis and trans effects. Whereas cis effects are caused by genetic variants in close proximity to the target gene, trans effects are due to distal genetic variants that affect diffusible elements such as transcription factors. Previous studies have mostly assessed the impact of cis and trans effects at the gene level. However, how cis and trans effects differentially impact regulatory elements such as enhancers and promoters remains poorly understood. Here, we used massively parallel reporter assays to directly measure cis and trans effects between human and mouse embryonic stem cells at thousands of individual regulatory elements. Our approach revealed that cis effects are widespread across regulatory elements, and the strongest cis effects are associated with the disruption of motifs recognized by strong transcriptional activators. Conversely, we found that trans effects are rare but stronger in enhancers than promoters, and can be attributed to a subset of transcription factors that are differentially expressed between human and mouse. While previous studies have found extensive co-occurrence of cis and trans effects in opposite directions that stabilize gene expression throughout evolution, we find that cis-trans compensation is uncommon within individual regulatory elements. Thus, our results are consistent with a model wherein compensatory cis-trans effects at the gene level are explained by cis and trans effects that separately impact several regulatory elements rather than cis-trans effects that occur simultaneously within a single regulatory element. Together, these results indicate that studying the evolution of individual regulatory elements is pivotal to understand the tempo and mode of gene expression evolution.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2018

High-throughput functional analysis of lncRNA core promoters elucidates rules governing tissue-specificity

Transcription initiates at both coding and non-coding genomic elements, including mRNA and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) core promoters and enhancer RNAs (eRNAs). However, each class has different expression profiles with lncRNAs and eRNAs being the most tissue-specific. How these complex differences in expression profiles and tissue-specificities are encoded in a single DNA sequence, however, remains unresolved. Here, we address this question using computational approaches and massively parallel reporter assays (MPRA) surveying hundreds of promoters and enhancers. We find that both divergent lncRNA and mRNA core promoters have higher capacities to drive transcription than non-divergent lncRNA and mRNA core promoters, respectively. Conversely, lincRNAs and eRNAs have lower capacities to drive transcription and are more tissue-specific than divergent genes. This higher tissue-specificity is strongly associated with having less complex TF motif profiles at the core promoter. We experimentally validated these findings by testing both engineered single-nucleotide deletions and human single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in MPRA. In both cases, we observe that single nucleotides associated with many motifs are important drivers of promoter activity. Thus, we suggest that high TF motif density serves as a robust mechanism to increase promoter activity at the expense of tissue-specificity. Moreover, we find that 22% of common SNPs in core promoter regions have significant regulatory effects. Collectively, our findings show that high TF motif density provides redundancy and increases promoter activity at the expense of tissue specificity, suggesting that specificity of expression may be regulated by simplicity of motif usage.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2016

Chromatin environment, transcriptional regulation, and splicing distinguish lincRNAs and mRNAs

While long intergenic noncoding RNAs (lincRNAs) and mRNAs share similar biogenesis pathways, these transcript classes differ in many regards. LincRNAs are less evolutionarily conserved, less abundant, and more tissue-specific, suggesting that their pre- and post-transcriptional regulation is different from that of mRNAs. Here, we perform an in-depth characterization of the features that contribute to lincRNA regulation in multiple human cell lines. We find that lincRNA promoters are depleted of transcription factor (TF) binding sites, yet enriched for some specific factors such as GATA and FOS relative to mRNA promoters. Surprisingly, we find that H3K9me3--a histone modification typically associated with transcriptional repression--is more enriched at the promoters of active lincRNA loci than at those of active mRNAs. Moreover, H3K9me3-marked lincRNA genes are more tissue-specific. The most discriminant differences between lincRNAs and mRNAs involve splicing. LincRNAs are less efficiently spliced, which cannot be explained by differences in U1 binding or the density of exonic splicing enhancers, but may be partially attributed to lower U2AF65 binding and weaker splicing-related motifs. Conversely, the stability of lincRNAs and mRNAs is similar, differing only with regard to the location of stabilizing protein binding sites. Finally, we find that certain transcriptional properties are correlated with higher evolutionary conservation in both DNA and RNA motifs, and are enriched in lincRNAs that have been functionally characterized.

genomics↗