Biology subjects

Mejia, A. F.

Publications and source records attributed to Mejia, A. F..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Utility and validity of group atlas versus personalized functional network approaches for depressive constructs

BackgroundTo understand the neurobiology underlying psychopathology, we need valid measurements of brain function. Group atlases for brain functional connectivity (FC) allow for efficient comparisons, but they fail to account for inter-individual variability in spatial features of networks, a problem that personalized approaches address. We assess the validity and predictive utility of group and personalized approaches of quantifying FC by 1) comparing effect sizes of associations with psychological metrics; and 2) accounting for spatial features of brain networks when examining the association between FC and psychological metrics. Methods324 teens ages 13-16 participated. The personalized approach for estimating networks was a hierarchical Bayesian model. Effect size comparisons were done by comparing the correlations between FC estimated using different methods (group, personalized, and the intersection of the group and personalized maps) and psychological metrics (depression, ruminative coping style, and sensitivity to punishment/reward) with Steiglers Z-test. We also conducted regressions, with psychological metrics as the dependent variables. Those models included FC and spatial features, together and alone. ResultsThe effect size comparisons did not survive FDR correction. However, exploratory permutation tests show that 1) the magnitude of the correlations with depression are larger on average for the intersection estimates of FC than the group estimates; and 2) the magnitude of the correlations with a ruminative coping style are larger on average for the intersection estimates of FC than the personalized estimate. The other comparisons conducted using permutation tests are not significant. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated that only spatial features of networks, not FC, are associated with sensitivity to reward. DiscussionThese results imply that the intersection estimates are more valid than the group estimates, and that the intersection estimates have greater predictive utility than personalized estimates. Further, spatial features of networks may be useful in and of themselves in certain contexts. Therefore, researchers in psychiatry should take into consideration spatial features of networks to gain a better understanding of the neurobiology underlying psychopathology.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2026

Impact of Censoring on the Quality of Cortical Parcellations and Personalized TMS Targets

Head motion systematically biases functional connectivity (FC) estimates in resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI). A common mitigation strategy is to censor high-motion volumes and discard high-motion runs. However, overly stringent censoring risks discarding signal alongside noise, potentially degrading FC estimates. Here, we test the efficacy of various censoring strategies on individual-specific cortical parcellations and personalized transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) target selection. Using precision-fMRI datasets comprising 50 individuals, we define individualized "ground-truth" references from [≥]1 hour of low-motion data per participant. We then simulate 10-min or 20-min rs-fMRI sessions with varying motion levels from the remaining data, yielding final samples of 22 and 19 participants, respectively. Higher motion produces parcellations and TMS targets that deviate further from the ground-truth references. However, at any given motion level, lenient censoring produces higher quality parcellations and personalized TMS targets than strict censoring. The improvement is comparable to doubling scan duration from 20 to 40 min under strict censoring. With personalized connectome-guided TMS, a common dilemma is whether to re-scan patients with only high-motion runs. A mixed-motion session with one low-motion run and one high-motion run may often be considered usable after discarding the high-motion run and strict censoring. We find that lenient censoring of high-motion-only sessions yields TMS targets comparable to - or even better than - those derived from strictly censored mixed-motion sessions. Therefore, within the motion range and parcellation/TMS targeting frameworks evaluated here, patients may not need to be re-scanned solely because all runs exceed strict censoring criteria.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Individual patterns of functional connectivity in neonates as revealed by surfaced-based Bayesian modeling

Resting-state functional connectivity is a widely used approach to study the functional brain network organization during early brain development. However, the estimation of functional connectivity networks in individual infants has been rather elusive due to the unique challenges involved with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from young populations. Here, we use fMRI data from the developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) database to characterize individual variability in a large cohort of term-born infants (N = 289) using a novel data-driven Bayesian framework. To enhance alignment across individuals, the analysis was conducted exclusively on the cortical surface, employing surface-based registration guided by age-matched neonatal atlases. Using 10 minutes of resting-state fMRI data, we successfully estimated subject-level maps for fourteen brain networks/subnetworks along with individual functional parcellation maps that revealed differences between subjects. We also found a significant relationship between age and mean connectivity strength in all brain regions, including previously unreported findings in higher-order networks. These results illustrate the advantages of surface-based methods and Bayesian statistical approaches in uncovering individual variability within very young populations.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Highlight Results, Don't Hide Them: Enhance interpretation, reduce biases and improve reproducibility

Most neuroimaging studies display results that represent only a tiny fraction of the collected data. While it is conventional to present "only the significant results" to the reader, here we suggest that this practice has several negative consequences for both reproducibility and understanding. This practice hides away most of the results of the dataset and leads to problems of selection bias and irreproducibility, both of which have been recognized as major issues in neuroimaging studies recently. Opaque, all-or-nothing thresholding, even if well-intentioned, places undue influence on arbitrary filter values, hinders clear communication of scientific results, wastes data, is antithetical to good scientific practice, and leads to conceptual inconsistencies. It is also inconsistent with the properties of the acquired data and the underlying biology being studied. Instead of presenting only a few statistically significant locations and hiding away the remaining results, we propose that studies should "highlight" the former while also showing as much as possible of the rest. This is distinct from but complementary to utilizing data sharing repositories: the initial presentation of results has an enormous impact on the interpretation of a study. We present practical examples for voxelwise, regionwise and cross-study analyses using publicly available data that was analyzed previously by 70 teams (NARPS; Botvinik-Nezer, et al., 2020), showing that it is possible to balance the goals of displaying a full set of results with providing the reader reasonably concise and "digestible" findings. In particular, the highlighting approach sheds useful light on the kind of variability present among the NARPS teams results, which is primarily a varied strength of agreement rather than disagreement. Using a meta-analysis built on the informative "highlighting" approach shows this relative agreement, while one using the standard "hiding" approach does not. We describe how this simple but powerful change in practice---focusing on highlighting results, rather than hiding all but the strongest ones---can help address many large concerns within the field, or at least to provide more complete information about them. We include a list of practical suggestions for results reporting to improve reproducibility, cross-study comparisons and meta-analyses. HighlightsO_LIMost studies do not present all results of their analysis, hiding subthreshold ones. C_LIO_LIHiding results negatively affects the interpretation and understanding of the study. C_LIO_LINeuroimagers should present all results of their study, highlighting key ones. C_LIO_LIUsing the public NARPS data, we show several benefits of the "highlighting" approach. C_LIO_LIThe highlighting approach improves individual studies and meta-analyses. C_LI

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

An updated C. elegans body muscle transcriptome for studies in muscle formation and function

The body muscle is an important tissue used in organisms for proper viability and locomotion. Although this tissue is generally well studied and characterized, and many pathways have been elucidated throughout the years, we still lack a comprehensive understanding of its transcriptome and how it controls muscle development and function. Here, we have updated a nuclear FACS sorting-based methodology to isolate and sequence a high-quality muscle transcriptome from C. elegans mixed-stage animals. We have identified 2,848 muscle-specific protein-coding genes, including 78 transcription factors and 206 protein-coding genes containing an RNA binding domain. We studied their interaction network, performed a detailed promoter analysis, and identified novel muscle-specific cis-acting elements. We have also identified 16 high-quality muscle-specific miRNAs, studied their function in vivo using fluorochrome-based analyses, and developed a high-quality C. elegans miRNA Interactome incorporating other muscle-specific datasets produced by our lab and others. Our study expands our understanding of how muscle tissue functions in C. elegans and in turn, provide results that can in the future be applied to humans to study muscular-related diseases.

genetics↗