bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Meeks, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Meeks, G..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Slave Trade and Colonial Expansion Resulted in Strong Sex-Biased Admixture in South Africa

The colonial-period arrival of Europeans in southern Africa is associated with strong sex-biased migration by which male settlers displaced indigenous Khoekhoe and San men. Simultaneously, the importation of South Asian, Indonesian and Eastern African slaves may have contributed female-biased migration to Cape Town and surrounding areas. We examine the spatial and temporal spread of sex-biased migration from the Cape northward into Namaqualand and the southern Kalahari using genetic data from more than 1,400 individuals. In all regions, admixture patterns were sex-biased, with evidence of a greater male contribution of European ancestry and greater female contribution of Khoe-San ancestry. While admixture among Khoe-San, European, equatorial African, and Asian groups has likely been continuous from the founding of Cape Town to present-day, we find that Khoe-San groups further north experienced a single pulse of European admixture 6-8 generations ago. European admixture was followed by additional Khoe-San gene flow, potentially reflecting an aggregation of indigenous groups due to disruption by colonial interlopers. Male migration into the northern frontier territories was not a homogenous group of expanding Afrikaners and slaves. The Nama show evidence of distinct founder effects and derive 15% of their male lineages from Asian men, a pattern absent in the =Khomani San. Khoe-San ancestry from the paternal line is greatly diminished in populations from Cape Town, the Cederberg Mountains and Upington, but remains more frequent in self-identified ethnically indigenous groups. Strikingly, we estimate that Khoe-San Y-chromosomes were experiencing unprecedented population growth at the time of European arrival. Our findings shed light on the patterns of admixture and the population history of South Africa as the colonial frontier expanded.

genetics↗

Impact of cross-ancestry genetic architecture on GWAS in admixed populations

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified thousands of variants for disease risk. These studies have predominantly been conducted in individuals of European ancestries, which raises questions about their transferability to individuals of other ancestries. Of particular interest are admixed populations, usually defined as populations with recent ancestry from two or more continental sources. Admixed genomes contain segments of distinct ancestries that vary in composition across individuals in the population, allowing for the same allele to induce risk for disease on different ancestral backgrounds. This mosaicism raises unique challenges for GWAS in admixed populations, such as the need to correctly adjust for population stratification to balance type I error with statistical power. In this work we quantify the impact of differences in estimated allelic effect sizes for risk variants between ancestry backgrounds on association statistics. Specifically, while the possibility of estimated allelic effect-size heterogeneity by ancestry (HetLanc) can be modeled when performing GWAS in admixed populations, the extent of HetLanc needed to overcome the penalty from an additional degree of freedom in the association statistic has not been thoroughly quantified. Using extensive simulations of admixed genotypes and phenotypes we find that modeling HetLanc in its absence reduces statistical power by up to 72%. This finding is especially pronounced in the presence of allele frequency differentiation. We replicate simulation results using 4,327 African-European admixed genomes from the UK Biobank for 12 traits to find that for most significant SNPs HetLanc is not large enough for GWAS to benefit from modeling heterogeneity.

bioinformatics↗