Biology subjects

McLaughlin, K.-M.

Publications and source records attributed to McLaughlin, K.-M..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Resistance patterns in drug-adapted cancer cell lines reflect complex evolution in clinical tumors

BackgroundHere, we introduce a novel set of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell lines consisting of MDA-MB-468, HCC38, and HCC1806 and their sublines adapted to cisplatin, doxorubicin, eribulin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, or 5-fluorouracil. MethodsThe cell lines were characterized by whole exome sequencing and the determination of drug-response profiles. Moreover, genes harbouring resistance-associated mutations were investigated using TCGA data for potential clinical relevance. ResultSequencing combined with TCGA-derived patient data resulted in the identification of 682 biomarker candidates in the pan-cancer analysis. Thirty-five genes were considered the most promising candidates because they harboured resistance-associated variants in at least two resistant sublines, and their expression correlated with TNBC patient survival. Exome sequencing and response profiles to cytotoxic drugs and DNA damage response inhibitors identified revealed remarkably little overlap between the resistant sublines, suggesting that each resistance formation process follows a unique route. All of the drug-resistant TNBC sublines remained sensitive or even displayed collateral sensitivity to a range of tested compounds. Cross-resistance levels were lowest for the CHK2 inhibitor CCT241533, the PLK1 inhibitor SBE13, and the RAD51 recombinase inhibitor B02, suggesting that CHK2, PLK1, and RAD51 are potential drug targets for therapy-refractory TNBC. ConclusionsWe present novel preclinical models of acquired drug resistance in TNBC and many novel candidate biomarkers for further investigation. The finding that each cancer cell line adaptation process follows an unpredictable route reflects recent findings on cancer cell evolution in patients, supporting the relevance of drug-adapted cancer cell lines as preclinical models of acquired resistance.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Differences between intrinsic and acquired nucleoside analogue resistance in acute myeloid leukaemia cells

BackgroundSAMHD1 mediates resistance to anti-cancer nucleoside analogues, including cytarabine, decitabine, and nelarabine that are commonly used for the treatment of leukaemia, through cleavage of their triphosphorylated forms. Hence, SAMHD1 inhibitors are promising candidates for the sensitisation of leukaemia cells to nucleoside analogue-based therapy. Here, we investigated the effects of the cytosine analogue CNDAC, which has been proposed to be a SAMHD1 substrate, in the context of SAMHD1. MethodsCNDAC was tested in 13 acute myeloid leukaemia (AML cell lines), in 26 acute lymphoblastic leukaemia cell lines, ten AML sublines adapted to various antileukaemic drugs, 24 single cell-derived clonal AML sublines, and primary leukaemic blasts from 24 AML patients. Moreover, 24 CNDAC-resistant sublines of the AML cell lines HL-60 and PL-21 were established. The SAMHD1 gene was disrupted using CRISPR/Cas9 and SAMHD1 depleted using RNAi, and the viral Vpx protein. Forced DCK expression was achieved by lentiviral transduction. SAMHD1 promoter methylation was determined by PCR after treatment of genomic DNA with the methylation-sensitive HpaII endonuclease. Nucleoside (analogue) triphosphate levels were determined by LC-MS/MS. CNDAC interaction with SAMHD1 was analysed by an enzymatic assay and by crystallisation. ResultsAlthough the cytosine analogue CNDAC was anticipated to inhibit SAMHD1, SAMHD1 mediated intrinsic CNDAC resistance in leukaemia cells. Accordingly, SAMHD1 depletion increased CNDAC triphosphate (CNDAC-TP) levels and CNDAC toxicity. Enzymatic assays and crystallisation studies confirmed CNDAC-TP to be a SAMHD1 substrate. In 24 CNDAC-adapted acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) sublines, resistance was driven by DCK (catalyses initial nucleoside phosphorylation) loss. CNDAC-adapted sublines displayed cross-resistance only to other DCK substrates (e.g. cytarabine, decitabine). Cell lines adapted to drugs not affected by DCK or SAMHD1 remained CNDAC sensitive. In cytarabine-adapted AML cells, increased SAMHD1 and reduced DCK levels contributed to cytarabine and CNDAC resistance. ConclusionIntrinsic and acquired resistance to CNDAC and related nucleoside analogues are driven by different mechanisms. The lack of cross-resistance between SAMHD1/ DCK substrates and non-substrates provides scope for next-line therapies after treatment failure.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

bioRxiv2021

Multifaceted roles of SAMHD1 in cancer

SAMHD1 is discussed as a tumour suppressor protein, but its potential role in cancer has only been investigated in very few cancer types. Here, we performed a systematic analysis of the TCGA (adult cancer) and TARGET (paediatric cancer) databases, the results of which did not suggest that SAMHD1 should be regarded as a bona fide tumour suppressor. SAMHD1 mutations that interfere with SAMHD1 function were not associated with poor outcome, which would be expected for a tumour suppressor. High SAMHD1 tumour levels were associated with increased survival in some cancer entities and reduced survival in others. Moreover, the data suggested differences in the role of SAMHD1 between males and females and between different races. Often, there was no significant relationship between SAMHD1 levels and cancer outcome. Taken together, our results indicate that SAMHD1 may exert pro-or anti-tumourigenic effects and that SAMHD1 is involved in the oncogenic process in a minority of cancer cases. These findings seem to be in disaccord with a perception and narrative forming in the field suggesting that SAMHD1 is a tumour suppressor. A systematic literature review confirmed that most of the available scientific articles focus on a potential role of SAMHD1 as a tumour suppressor. The reasons for this remain unclear but may include confirmation bias and publication bias. Our findings emphasise that hypotheses, perceptions, and assumptions need to be continuously challenged by using all available data and evidence.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2021

CD47 as a potential biomarker for the early diagnosis of severe COVID-19

The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is the cause of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Most SARS-CoV-2 infections are mild or even asymptomatic. However, a small fraction of infected individuals develops severe, life-threatening disease, which is caused by an uncontrolled immune response resulting in hyperinflammation. Antiviral interventions are only effective prior to the onset of hyperinflammation. Hence, biomarkers are needed for the early identification and treatment of high-risk patients. Here, we show in a range of model systems and data from post mortem samples that SARS-CoV-2 infection results in increased levels of CD47, which is known to mediate immune escape in cancer and virus-infected cells. Systematic literature searches also indicated that known risk factors such as older age and diabetes are associated with increased CD47 levels. High CD47 levels contribute to vascular disease, vasoconstriction, and hypertension, conditions which may predispose SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals to COVID-19-related complications such as pulmonary hypertension, lung fibrosis, myocardial injury, stroke, and acute kidney injury. Hence, CD47 is a candidate biomarker for severe COVID-19. Further research will have to show whether CD47 is a reliable diagnostic marker for the early identification of COVID-19 patients requiring antiviral therapy.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2020

COVID-19-related coagulopathy, is transferrin a missing link?

SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent of COVID-19. Severe COVID-19 disease has been associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation and thrombosis, but the mechanisms underlying COVID-19-related coagulopathy remain unknown. Since the risk of severe COVID-19 disease is higher in males than in females and increases with age, we combined proteomics data from SARS-CoV-2-infected cells with human gene expression data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) database to identify gene products involved in coagulation that change with age, differ in their levels between females and males, and are regulated in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. This resulted in the identification of transferrin as a candidate coagulation promoter, whose levels increases with age and are higher in males than in females and that is increased upon SARS-CoV-2 infection. A systematic investigation of gene products associated with the GO term "blood coagulation" did not reveal further high confidence candidates, which are likely to contribute to COVID-19-related coagulopathy. In conclusion, the role of transferrin should be considered in the course of COVID-19 disease and further examined in ongoing clinic-pathological investigations.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2020

SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV differ in their cell tropism and drug sensitivity profiles

SARS-CoV-2 is a novel coronavirus currently causing a pandemic. We show that the majority of amino acid positions, which differ between SARS-CoV-2 and the closely related SARS-CoV, are differentially conserved suggesting differences in biological behaviour. In agreement, novel cell culture models revealed differences between the tropism of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. Moreover, cellular ACE2 (SARS-CoV-2 receptor) and TMPRSS2 (enables virus entry via S protein cleavage) levels did not reliably indicate cell susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV further differed in their drug sensitivity profiles. Thus, only drug testing using SARS-CoV-2 reliably identifies therapy candidates. Therapeutic concentrations of the approved protease inhibitor aprotinin displayed anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity. The efficacy of aprotinin and of remdesivir (currently under clinical investigation against SARS-CoV-2) were further enhanced by therapeutic concentrations of the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole (aprotinin 2.7-fold, remdesivir 10-fold). Hence, our study has also identified anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapy candidates that can be readily tested in patients.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2019

SAMHD1 is a key regulator of the lineage-specific response of acute lymphoblastic leukaemias to nelarabine

The nucleoside analogue nelarabine, the prodrug of arabinosylguanine (AraG), has been known for decades to be effective against acute lymphoblastic leukaemias of T-cell (T-ALL), but not of B-cell (B-ALL) origin. The mechanisms underlying this lineage-specific drug sensitivity have remained elusive. Data from pharmacogenomics studies and from a panel of ALL cell lines revealed an inverse correlation of SAMHD1 expression and nelarabine sensitivity. SAMHD1 can hydrolyse and thus inactivate triphosphorylated nucleoside analogues. Transcriptomic and protein expression profiling of cell lines and patient-derived leukaemic blasts revealed lower SAMHD1 abundance in T-ALL than in B-ALL. Mechanistically, SAMHD1 promoter methylation strongly correlated with suppressed SAMHD1 expression, while T-ALL cells did not display increased global DNA methylation. Targeted SAMHD1 degradation using virus-like particles containing Vpx sensitised B-ALL cells to AraG, while ectopic SAMHD1 expression in SAMHD1-null T-ALL cells induced AraG resistance. SAMHD1 had a larger impact on cytarabine activity than on nelarabine/ AraG activity in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) cells, but more strongly affected nelarabine/ AraG activity in ALL cells. This indicates a critical role of the cancer entity. In conclusion, lineage-specific differences in SAMHD1 promoter methylation and, in turn, SAMHD1 expression levels determine ALL cell response to nelarabine. SAMHD1 is a potential biomarker for the identification of ALL patients likely to benefit from nelarabine therapy and a therapeutic target to overcome nelarabine resistance.

pharmacology and toxicology↗