Biology subjects

McKay, N. S.

Publications and source records attributed to McKay, N. S..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Biomarker Variability Limits Individualized Amyloid Time Estimation in Alzheimer Disease

ObjectiveDisease progression modeling (DPM) or "amyloid time" is increasingly used to stage Alzheimer disease (AD). DPM performance depends on within-individual heterogeneity in rates of pathological accumulation as well as test-retest reliability of the biomarker. The relative contributions of these variabilities have not been systematically assessed. This would be particularly relevant if extrapolations from DPM were to be used to make individual-level predictions for research, clinical trials, or potentially future clinical practice. MethodsWe conducted simulation studies incorporating empirically-derived noise properties from amyloid biomarkers to assess the contributions of inter- and intra-individual variability. Findings generalized in an autosomal dominant AD cohort with amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma biomarkers and in a sporadic AD cohort with both amyloid PET and plasma biomarkers. We assessed group level DPM performance via mean average error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE). At the individual level, we evaluated distinctness of distributions of biomarker levels associated with specific disease timings. ResultsInter-individual variability was the dominant source of error in temporal estimates. Intra-individual variability reduced estimate stability. Optimal performance occurred in biomarkers with positive average accumulation rates where a subset of individuals had exceptionally high levels of accumulation. In research study data, amyloid PET outperformed CSF and plasma biomarkers. InterpretationDPM is fundamentally constrained by dynamic range, variability, and test-retest reliability of the biomarker of interest. Current DPM approaches are more robust at the group level, particularly when applied to biomarkers with more than 10-15% variability like fluid biomarkers. FundingNational Institute on Aging, Alzheimers Association, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Raul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, Korean Ministry of Health & Welfare and Ministry of Science and ICT, Spanish Institute of Health.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2022

Neuroimaging within the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network (DIAN): PET and MRI

The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) Observational Study is an international collaboration studying autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (ADAD). This rare form of Alzheimer disease (AD) is caused by mutations in the presenilin 1 (PSEN1), presenilin 2 (PSEN2), or amyloid precursor protein (APP) genes. As individuals from these families have a 50% chance of inheriting the familial mutation, this provides researchers with a well-matched cohort of carriers vs non-carriers for case-control studies. An important trait of ADAD is that the age at symptom onset is highly predictable and consistent for each specific mutation, allowing researchers to estimate an individuals point in their disease time course prior to symptom onset. Although ADAD represents only a small proportion (approximately 0.1%) of all AD cases, studying this form of AD allows researchers to investigate preclinical AD and the progression of changes that occur within the brain prior to AD symptom onset. Furthermore, the young age at symptom onset (typically 30-60 years) means age-related comorbidities are much less prevalent than in sporadic AD, thereby allowing AD pathophysiology to be studied independent of these confounds. A major goal of the DIAN Observational Study is to create a global resource for AD researchers. To that end, the current manuscript provides an overview of the DIAN magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) protocols and highlights the key imaging results of this study to date.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Investigating the Influence of the Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Val66Met Single Nucleotide Polymorphism on Familiarity and Recollection Event-Related Potentials

The Val66Met single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) has previously been reported to impact performance on recognition memory tasks. Whether the two subprocesses of recognition--familiarity and recollection--are differentially impacted by the Val66Met SNP remains unknown. Using event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded during a source memory task, we attempted to dissociate these two subprocesses. Behaviourally, we used participants scores on an item-recognition subtask as a measure of familiarity, and participants scores on a source-recognition subtask as a measure of recollection. Our findings reveal that Val/Val individuals outperform Met allele carriers on the item-but not the source-recognition task. Electrophysiologically, we were interested in the N400, an early frontal component previously linked to familiarity, and the late positive complex (LPC), a posterior component linked to recollection. We found evidence for Val/Val individuals having larger amplitudes of the LPC compared to Met allele carriers, and evidence for no difference in the N400 amplitudes of these groups. Based on the lack of dissociation between familiarity- and recollection-specific ERPs at the LPC time window, we argue that our behavioural and ERP results might reflect better item-recognition for Val/Val individuals compared to Met allele carriers. We further suggest that both these results reflect differences related to familiarity, rather than recollection.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

The Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Val66Met Genotype Does Not Influence the Grey or White Matter Structures Underlying Recognition Memory

A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the gene coding for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has previously been associated with a reduction in recognition memory performance. While previous findings have highlighted that this SNP contributes to recognition memory, little is known about its influence on subprocesses of recognition, familiarity and recollection. Previous research has reported reduced hippocampal volume and decreased fractional anisotropy in carriers of the Met allele across a range of white matter tracts, including those networks that may support recognition memory. Here, we used a source memory task to measure accuracy on each recognition subprocess, in order to determine whether the Val66Met SNP influences these equally. Additionally, we compared grey matter volume between these groups for structures that underpin familiarity and recollection separately. Finally, we used probabilistic tractography to reconstruct tracts that subserve each of these two recognition systems. Behaviourally, we found group differences on the familiarity measure, but not on recollection. However, we did not find any group difference on grey- or white-matter structures. Together, these results suggest a functional influence of the Val66Met SNP that is independent of coarse structural changes, and nuance previous research highlighting the relationship between BDNF, brain structure, and behaviour.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

No Evidence for Systematic White Matter Correlates of Dyslexia and Dyscalculia

Learning disabilities such as dyslexia, dyscalculia and their comorbid manifestation are prevalent, affecting as much as fifteen percent of the population. Structural neuroimaging studies have indicated that these disorders can be related to differences in white matter integrity, although findings remain disparate. In this study, we used a unique design composed of individuals with dyslexia, dyscalculia, both disorders and controls, to systematically explore differences in fractional anisotropy across groups using diffusion tensor imaging. Specifically, we focused on the corona radiata and the arcuate fasciculus, two tracts associated with reading and mathematics in a number of previous studies. Using Bayesian hypothesis testing, we show that the present data favor the null model of no differences between groups for these particular tracts--a finding that seems to go against the current view but might be representative of the disparities within this field of research. Together, these findings suggest that structural differences associated with dyslexia and dyscalculia might not be as reliable as previously thought, with potential ramifications in terms of remediation.

neuroscience↗