bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

McCarren, S.

Publications and source records attributed to McCarren, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Abiotic pollen loss: The neglected pollen fate

BackgroundPollen production is a costly investment in angiosperm reproduction, yet only a small fraction of grains reach conspecific stigmas. While pollen loss to floral visitors is well studied, the role of abiotic factors in shaping pollen fate has been largely overlooked. Understanding the relative contributions of biotic and abiotic pollen loss pathways is essential for interpreting floral trait evolution and pollination efficiency. ResultsWe quantified abiotic pollen loss in four animal-pollinated species with contrasting floral longevities and reproductive phase dynamics. Flowers were monitored for five hours after anthesis, with pollen loss compared between unvisited flowers and those receiving single pollinator visits. Across all species, substantial pollen loss occurred in the absence of visitation, ranging from 37-57% of grains. In several cases, losses to legitimate pollinators were indistinguishable from abiotic loss alone, whereas pollen-foraging honeybees removed significantly greater fractions. ConclusionAbiotic factors can account for a large proportion of total pollen loss, sometimes equalling or exceeding pollinator-mediated removal. These findings challenge the assumption that pollen loss is primarily driven by pollinator activity and suggest that floral traits such as closure, gradual pollen release, and pollen packaging may function as adaptations that minimize environmental loss. Incorporating abiotic pollen loss into studies of pollen presentation and pollinator effectiveness provides a more complete understanding of selective pressures shaping floral evolution.

evolutionary biology↗

Selective contexts favouring asymmetry: a theoretical and empirical study of pollen transfer in mirror-image flowers

Reciprocal herkogamy has evolved multiple times in flowering plants and is thought to enhance cross-pollination and reduce reproductive interference. Mirror-image flowers represent a form of reciprocal herkogamy in which plants have either right-or left-deflected styles (dimorphic enantiostyly) or produce both stylar orientations (monomorphic enantiostyly). The ecological conditions under which these two forms of enantiostyly originate and persist remain poorly understood. Here, we investigate how floral asymmetry affects pollen transfer dynamics and mating outcomes, and under which conditions enantiostyly provides a fitness advantage over straight-styled floral morphologies. We integrate field observations of dimorphic enantiostylous Wachendorfia paniculata with a mathematical model simulating pollen transfer in plants with straight-styled, monomorphic, and dimorphic enantiostylous flowers. The model incorporates pollinator pathways, pollen carryover, and floral display size, and was parameterized using our ecological data. Enantiostylous flowers received more outcrossed pollen than straight-styled flowers, with dimorphism outperforming monomorphism. However, enantiostyly increased stochasticity in pollen transfer due to variation in pollinator pathways. Intrafloral self-pollination was extremely low in enantiostylous flowers and did not differ between monomorphic and dimorphic forms. Dimorphic enantiostylous plants exhibited longer pollen carryover curves and exported more pollen to more mates potentially increasing siring success and mate diversity. Enantiostyly, particularly in dimorphic systems, can provide a selective advantage by improving pollen receipt and export components of fitness through enhanced outcrossing. This mating advantage may be reduced under conditions of pollen limitation or when autogamy in straight-styled flowers is low. Our findings clarify the functional significance of enantiostyly and offer a framework for understanding the evolution of floral asymmetry in angiosperms.

evolutionary biology↗