bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Mattout, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Mattout, J..

11 recordsLinked to original sources

Dynamic and task-dependent decoding of the human attentional spotlight from MEG

Attention is a fundamental mechanism enabling the brain to overcome its limited capacity for parallel processing. In non-human primates, invasive electrophysiology has shown that attentional selection operates rhythmically, primarily within the alpha ([~]8-12 Hz) and theta ([~]4-5 Hz) bands. Whether such finely resolved control signals can be captured non-invasively in humans, and how they adapt to changing task demands, remains unclear. Using high-precision magnetoencephalography (MEG) combined with machine learning, we decoded the spatial locus of covert attention in humans performing three variants of a spatial cueing task that manipulated cue validity as well invalid trial switching rules. Spatial attention could be decoded from whole-brain MEG activity at both static and time-resolved scales, with accuracies significantly above chance (N = 30). Decoding performance decreased as cue validity was reduced, indicating that task structure shapes attentional engagement. Analysis of decoding trajectories revealed rhythmic fluctuations at [~]8-12 Hz across all tasks, demonstrating alpha-band sampling of attention. Pre-target attention became increasingly focused on the cued side, especially in the 100% Valid condition, consistent with proactive orienting. Furthermore, individual and task-specific differences in decoding strength correlated with task-variations in behavioral performance, linking the accuracy of neural attention codes to both discrimination accuracy and reaction time. These findings demonstrate that MEG can non-invasively capture dynamic, task-dependent fluctuations in spatial attention that parallel those observed in non-human primates. They reveal that attentional demands reshape the neural code for attention, modulate rhythmic sampling, and influence behavioral efficiency. This work bridges invasive primate and non-invasive human research and establishes MEG-based decoding of attention as a promising tool for mechanistic and clinical applications, including neurofeedback and attention-related interventions.

neuroscience↗

The Mismatch Negativity compared: EEG, SQUID-MEG and novel 4Helium-OPMs

Magneto-encephalography (MEG) provides a higher spatial resolution than electro-encephalography (EEG) to measure human auditory responses. However, conventional cryogenic MEG systems (SQUID-MEG) suffer from severe technological restrictions limiting, for instance, routine clinical use. Fortunately, a new generation of MEG sensors, optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs), have been developed to bridge the gap, combining the wearability of EEG with the benefits of MEG signal acquisition. We aim to assess their potential for studying auditory mismatch processing. The auditory Mismatch Negativity (MMN) is a well-characterized evoked component observable using a passive oddball paradigm with two-tone sound sequences. It has been extensively described using both EEG and MEG and is part of many EEG-based clinical applications, such as the assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness. MMN is therefore a relevant candidate to evaluate OPM performance. We use recently developed Helium-OPMs, which are high dynamic range MEG sensors that operate at room temperature. We compare their performance with cryogenic SQUID-MEG and EEG in a passive frequency oddball paradigm. Results show a significant MMN across subjects in all modalities as well as a high temporal similarity between modalities. Signal-to-noise ratios were also similar, and detection of significant individual MMN (within-subjects) using the OPM system was equal or better than EEG. Given that the OPM system tested here is a prototype comprised of only five sensors, these results are a promising step towards wearable MEG that combines the advantages of MEG and EEG.

neuroscience↗

Surfing beta burst waveforms to improve motor imagery-based BCI

Our understanding of motor-related, macroscale brain processes has been significantly shaped by the description of the event-related desynchronization (ERD) and synchronization (ERS) phenomena in the mu and beta frequency bands prior to, during and following movement. The demonstration of reproducible, spatially-and band-limited signal power changes has, consequently, attracted the interest of non invasive brain-computer interface (BCI) research for a long time. BCIs often rely on motor imagery (MI) experimental paradigms that are expected to generate brain signal modulations analogous to movement-related ERD and ERS. However, a number of recent neuroscience studies has questioned the nature of these phenomena. Beta band activity has been shown to occur, on a single-trial level, in short, transient and heterogeneous events termed bursts rather than sustained oscillations. In a previous study, we established that an analysis of hand MI binary classification tasks based on beta bursts can be superior to beta power in terms of classification score. In this article we elaborate on this idea, proposing a signal processing algorithm that is comparable to-and compatible with state-of-the-art techniques. Our pipeline filters brain recordings by convolving them with kernels extracted from beta bursts and then applies spatial filtering before classification. This data-driven filtering allowed for a simple and efficient analysis of signals from multiple sensors thus being suitable for online applications. By adopting a time-resolved decoding approach we explored MI dynamics and showed the specificity of the new classification features. In accordance with previous results, beta bursts improved classification performance compared to beta band power, while often increasing information transfer rate compared to state-of-the-art approaches. Significance statementPatterns of waveform-specific burst rate comprise an alternative, neurophysiology-informed way of analyzing beta band activity during motor imagery (MI) tasks. By testing this method on multiple electroencephalography datasets and comparing its corresponding classification scores against those of conventional power-based features, this work demonstrates that brain-computer interface applications could benefit from utilizing beta burst activity. This activity gives access to a reliable decoding performance often requiring short recordings. As such, this study shows that waveform-specific beta burst rates encode information related to imagined (and presumably real) movements and serves as the first step for a real-time implementation of the proposed methodology.

neuroscience↗

Humans progressively feel agency over events triggered before their actions

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become increasingly efficient in anticipating our behavior. Will this impact, in the near future, how much we feel control over events generated with AI-assistance? This would in turn influence our decisions, actions, mental health and sense of responsibility. In everyday life, our sense of agency over events occurring at various delays after our actions has adapted to accommodate these delays. Here, we investigate whether our sense of agency can also adapt to an unusual situation where a consequence precedes an action. We used an online game in which players aimed to beat the computer at finding and clicking on a target to trigger an animation, while, in fact, an algorithm triggered the animation before the players click. The animation was not randomly controlled by the algorithm, but rather based on the history of the players past movements and on the beginning of their current movement. We used correlational, machine learning decoding, and modelling approaches to capture how players compute their reported sense of agency over the animation. We found evidence that, in less than an hour, players implicitly learned that the timing of the animation was related to their own actions, and adapted their sense of agency accordingly. Such findings may help us to anticipate how humans will integrate AI-assistance to guide their behavior.

neuroscience↗

Beta bursts question the ruling power for brain-computer interfaces

Current efforts to build reliable brain-computer interfaces (BCI) span multiple axes from hardware, to software, to more sophisticated experimental protocols, and personalized approaches. However, despite these abundant efforts, there is still room for significant improvement. We argue that a rather overlooked direction lies in linking BCI protocols with recent advances in fundamental neuroscience. In light of these advances, and particularly the characterization of the burst-like nature of beta frequency band activity and the diversity of beta bursts, we revisit the role of beta activity in "left vs. right hand" motor imagery tasks. Current decoding approaches for such tasks take advantage of the fact that motor imagery generates time-locked changes in induced power in the sensorimotor cortex, and rely on band-pass filtered power changes or covariance matrices which also describe co-varying power changes in signals recorded from different channels. Although little is known about the dynamics of beta burst activity during motor imagery, we hypothesized that beta bursts should be modulated in a way analogous to their activity during performance of real upper limb movements. We show that classification features based on patterns of beta burst modulations yield decoding results that are equivalent to or better than typically used beta power across multiple open electroencephalography datasets, thus providing insights into the specificity of these bio-markers.

neuroscience↗

Diverse beta burst waveform motifs characterize movement-related cortical dynamics

Classical analyses of induced, frequency-specific neural activity typically average bandlimited power over trials. More recently, it has become widely appreciated that in individual trials, beta band activity occurs as transient bursts rather than amplitude-modulated oscillations. Most studies of beta bursts treat them as unitary, and having a stereotyped waveform. However, we show there is a wide diversity of burst shapes. Using a biophysical model of burst generation, we demonstrate that waveform variability is predicted by variability in the synaptic drives that generate beta bursts. We then use a novel, adaptive burst detection algorithm to identify bursts from human MEG sensor data recorded during a joystick-based reaching task, and apply principal component analysis to burst waveforms to define a set of dimensions, or motifs, that best explain waveform variance. Finally, we show that bursts with a particular range of waveform motifs, ones not fully accounted for by the biophysical model, differentially contribute to movement-related beta dynamics. Sensorimotor beta bursts are therefore not homogeneous events and likely reflect distinct computational processes.

neuroscience↗

Time-resolved dynamic computational modeling of human EEG recordings reveals gradients of generative mechanisms for the MMN response

Despite attempts to unify the different theoretical accounts of the mismatch negativity (MMN), there is still an ongoing debate on the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying this complex brain response. On one hand, neuronal adaptation to recurrent stimuli is able to explain many of the observed properties of the MMN, such as its sensitivity to controlled experimental parameters. On the other hand, several modeling studies reported evidence in favor of Bayesian learning models for explaining the trial-to-trial dynamics of the human MMN. However, direct comparisons of these two main hypotheses are scarce, and previous modeling studies suffered from methodological limitations. Based on reports indicating spatial and temporal dissociation of physiological mechanisms within the timecourse of mismatch responses in animals, we hypothesized that different computational models would best fit different temporal phases of the human MMN. Using electroencephalographic data from two independent studies of a simple auditory oddball task (n = 82), we compared adaptation and Bayesian learning models ability to explain the sequential dynamics of auditory deviance detection in a time-resolved fashion. We first ran simulations to evaluate the capacity of our design to dissociate the tested models and found that they were sufficiently distinguishable above a certain level of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In subjects with a sufficient SNR, our time-resolved approach revealed a temporal dissociation between the two model families, with high evidence for adaptation during the early MMN window (from 90 to 150-190 ms post-stimulus depending on the dataset) and for Bayesian learning later in time (170-180 ms or 200-220ms). In addition, Bayesian model averaging of fixed-parameter models within the adaptation family revealed a gradient of adaptation rates, resembling the anatomical gradient in the auditory cortical hierarchy reported in animal studies. Author summaryThe ability to detect and adapt to changes in the environment is an essential feature for survival of living beings. Two main theories have been proposed to explain how the brain performs such an automatic task in the auditory domain. The first one, adaptation, emphasizes the ability of auditory cortical and sub-cortical neurons to attenuate their response to repeated stimuli, which renders the brain more sensitive to deviations from expected sensory inputs. The second one, Bayesian learning, further involves higher-level cortical regions which would update their predictions about incoming stimuli, depending on their performance at predicting previous ones. These two views may not be mutually exclusive, but few experimental works compared them directly. We used computational models inspired from both accounts to assess which view may provide a better fit of two independent electrophysiological datasets from similar auditory experiments. Evidence from a large sample of 82 human subjects provided a complex picture, with adaptation processes seemingly dominating the early phase of auditory brain response, and Bayesian learning processes appearing later on. Our results converge with other recent works in animals and points to the necessary reconciliation of those two theories for a better understanding of auditory perception and statistical learning.

neuroscience↗

Estimates of cortical column orientation improveMEG source inversion

Determining the anatomical source of brain activity non-invasively measured from EEG or MEG sensors is challenging. In order to simplify the source localization problem, many techniques introduce the assumption that current sources lie on the cortical surface. Another common assumption is that this current flow is orthogonal to the cortical surface, thereby approximating the orientation of cortical columns. However, it is not clear which cortical surface to use to define the current source locations, and normal vectors computed from a single cortical surface may not be the best approximation to the orientation of cortical columns. We compared three different surface location priors and five different approaches for estimating dipole vector orientation, both in simulations and visual and motor evoked MEG responses. We show that models with source locations on the white matter surface and using methods based on establishing correspondences between white matter and pial cortical surfaces dramatically outperform models with source locations on the pial or combined pial/white surfaces and which use methods based on the geometry of a single cortical surface in fitting evoked visual and motor responses. These methods can be easily implemented and adopted in most M/EEG analysis pipelines, with the potential to significantly improve source localization of evoked responses.

neuroscience↗

Empirical evaluation of fused EEG-MEG source reconstruction. Application to auditory mismatch generators

Since their introduction in the late eighties, Bayesian approaches for neuroimaging have opened the way to new powerful and quantitative analysis of brain data. Here, we apply this statistical framework to evaluate empirically the gain of fused EEG-MEG source reconstruction, compared to unimodal (EEG or MEG) one. Combining EEG and MEG information for source reconstruction has been consistently evidenced to enhance localization performances using simulated data. However, given considerable efforts to conduct simultaneous recordings, empirical evaluation becomes necessary to quantify the real information gain. And this is obviously not straightforward due to the ill-posedness of the inverse problem. Here, we consider Bayesian model comparison to quantify the ability of EEG, MEG and fused (EEG/MEG) inversions of individual data to resolve spatial source models. These models consisted in group-level cortical distributions inferred from real EEG, MEG and EEG/MEG brain responses. We applied this comparative evaluation to the timely issue of the generators of auditory mismatch responses evoked by unexpected sounds. These included the well-known Mismatch Negativity (MMN) but also earlier deviance responses. As expected, fused localization was evidenced to outperform unimodal inversions with larger model separability. The present methodology confirms with real data the theoretical interest of simultaneous EEG/MEG recordings and fused inversion to highly inform (spatially and temporally) source modeling. Precisely, a bilateral fronto-temporal network could be identified for both the MMN and early deviance response. Interestingly, multimodal inversions succeeded in revealing spatio-temporal details of the functional organization within the supratemporal plane that have not been reported so far, nor were visible here with unimodal inversions. The present refined auditory network could serve as priors for auditory modeling studies.

neuroscience↗

Looking for a reference for large datasets: relative reliability of visual and automatic sleep scoring

Study ObjectivesNew challenges in sleep science require to describe fine grain phenomena or to deal with large datasets. Beside the human resource challenge of scoring huge datasets, the inter- and intra-expert variability may also reduce the sensitivity of such studies. Searching for a way to disentangle the variability induced by the scoring method from the actual variability in the data, visual and automatic sleep scorings of healthy individuals were examined.\n\nMethodsA first dataset (DS1, 4 recordings) scored by 6 experts plus an autoscoring algorithm was used to characterize inter-scoring variability. A second dataset (DS2, 88 recordings) scored a few weeks later was used to investigate intra-expert variability. Percentage agreements and Congers kappa were derived from epoch-by-epoch comparisons on pairwise, consensus and majority scorings.\n\nResultsOn DS1 the number of epochs of agreement decreased when the number of expert increased, in both majority and consensus scoring, where agreement ranged from 86% (pairwise) to 69% (all experts). Adding autoscoring to visual scorings changed the kappa value from 0.81 to 0.79. Agreement between expert consensus and autoscoring was 93%. On DS2 intra-expert variability was evidenced by the kappa systematic decrease between autoscoring and each single expert between datasets (0.75 to 0.70).\n\nConclusionsVisual scoring induces inter- and intra-expert variability, which is difficult to address especially in big data studies. When proven to be reliable and if perfectly reproducible, autoscoring methods can cope with intra-scorer variability making them a sensible option when dealing with large datasets.\n\nStatement of SignificanceWe confirmed and extended previous findings highlighting the intra- and inter-expert variability in visual sleep scoring. On large datasets those variability issues cannot be completely addressed by neither practical nor statistical solutions such as group training, majority or consensus scoring.\n\nWhen an automated scoring method can be proven to be as reasonably imperfect as visual scoring but perfectly reproducible, it can serve as a reliable scoring reference for sleep studies.

neuroscience↗

Evidence for implicit and adaptive deployment of precision weighting during passive listening: a simultaneous EEG/MEG study

Predictive coding accounts of brain functions profoundly influence current approaches to perceptual synthesis. However, a fundamental paradox has emerged, that may be very relevant for understanding hallucinations, psychosis or cognitive inflexibility. This paradox is that in some situations surprise or prediction error related responses can decrease when predicted and yet, they can increase when we know they are predictable. This paradox is resolved by recognizing that brain responses reflect precision weighted prediction error. This then presses us to disambiguate the contributions of precision and prediction error in electrophysiology. We report, for the first time, an experimental paradigm that may be able to meet this challenge. We examined brain responses to unexpected and expected surprising sounds, assuming that the latter yield a smaller prediction error but much more amplified by a larger precision weight. Importantly, addressing this modulation requires the modelling of trial-by-trial variations of brain responses, that we reconstructed within a fronto-temporal network by combining EEG and MEG. Our results reveal an adaptive learning of surprise with larger integration of past (relevant) information in the context of expected surprises. Within the auditory hierarchy, this adaptation was found tied down to specific connections and reveals in particular and crucially precision encoding through neuronal excitability. Strikingly, these fine processes are automated as sound sequences were unattended. These findings directly speak to applications in psychiatry, where it has been suggested that a specifically impaired precision weighting is at the heart of several conditions such as schizophrenia and autism.

neuroscience↗