bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Mathan, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Mathan, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Central Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonism Ameliorates Colonic Inflammation in a Murine Model of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have revolutionized the treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D). These drugs also have anti-inflammatory effects that have recently been extended to the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Whether the mechanism underlying this benefit involves a direct action on the intestine or instead is mediated via GLP-1Rs in the brain, however, is unknown. Based on evidence implicating the brain as the target for the anti-obesity and anti-inflammatory effects of GLP-1RAs, we sought to determine if central GLP-1R signaling is sufficient to explain its intestinal anti-inflammatory effects. To this end, we compared the efficacy of peripheral vs central administration of the GLP-1RA, semaglutide (SEMA), in diet-induced obese (DIO) mice with dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colitis. We report that compared to vehicle, both colitis severity and histopathological injury following DSS administration are reduced by peripheral administration of SEMA. We also report that this benefit is largely recapitulated by intracerebroventricular administration of SEMA at a low dose that, when administered peripherally, is below that needed to affect food intake and body weight. We conclude that in a mouse model of colitis, activation of GLP-1Rs in the brain is sufficient to explain the intestinal anti-inflammatory effect conferred by GLP-1R agonism.

neuroscience↗

Blinding efficacy and adverse events following repeated transcranial alternating current, direct current, and random noise stimulation.

As transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) protocols advance, assumptions underlying the technique need to be retested to ensure they still hold. Whilst the safety of stimulation has been demonstrated mainly for a small number of sessions, and small sample size, adverse events (AEs) following multiple sessions remain largely untested. Similarly, whilst blinding procedures are typically assumed to be effective, the effect of multiple stimulation sessions on the efficacy of blinding procedures also remains under question. This is especially relevant in multisite projects where small unintentional variations in protocol could lead to inter-site difference. We report AE and blinding data from 1,019 participants who received up to 11 semi-consecutive sessions of active or sham transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), direct current stimulation (tDCS), and random noise stimulation (tRNS), at 4 sites in the UK and US. We found that AEs were often best predicted by factors other than tES, such as testing site or session number. Results from the blinding analysis suggested that blinding was less effective for tDCS and tACS than tRNS. The occurrence of AEs did not appear to be linked to tES despite the use of smaller electrodes or repeated delivery. However, blinding efficacy was impacted in tES conditions with higher cutaneous sensation, highlighting a need for alternative stimulation blinding protocols. This may be increasingly necessary in studies wishing to deliver stimulation with higher intensities.

neuroscience↗