bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Mastrostefano, E.

Publications and source records attributed to Mastrostefano, E..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Multiscale modelling of drug-host-pathogen interaction: quantifying drug and immune contributions to treatment response

Background and Objective: Predicting treatment outcomes in infectious diseases requires accounting for the interplay between drug effects, pathogen dynamics, and host immunity. Integrating pharmacological and immunological approaches into a single simulation environment remains a fundamental challenge in both theory and practice. We aimed to develop and validate a multiscale in silico framework coupling these processes, and to quantify their respective contributions to bacterial clearance. Methods: We present the Drug-Host-Pathogen Interaction (DHPI) framework, combining three independent mechanistic components: a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of drug disposition, a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of drug-induced bacterial killing, and a stochastic agent-based model of the immune response. Continuous concentration profiles are time-averaged onto the agent-based time grid, assigned to bacterial phenotypic states, and converted into per-agent killing probabilities, so that drug-mediated and immune-mediated death events are recorded separately at each step. The framework was applied to simulate symptomatic pulmonary tuberculosis. Phenotype-specific drug-efficacy parameters were inferred using Approximate Bayesian Computation from historical clinical data on eight weeks of 600 mg rifampicin monotherapy, and validated against independent early bactericidal activity data over a disjoint time window. Results: The calibrated framework reproduced the observed decline in bacterial load, and matched reported early bactericidal activity over the first week. In a virtual cohort of symptomatic patients, drug-mediated killing accounted for 81-88% and immune-mediated killing for 12-19% of total bacterial elimination over the 60-day treatment course, while the dormant, granuloma-contained fraction rose from 0.20-0.29 in the first week to 0.85-0.89 at treatment completion. Over a follow-up of up to 50 years, patients reaching clinical cure had accumulated more memory lymphocytes during treatment than those progressing to clinical failure or death; moreover, the final outcome depended on the immune changes occurring during therapy rather than on the initial disease stage. Conclusions: The results show that the DHPI framework can reproduce treatment dynamics observed in patients and enable the analysis of how therapy reshapes host immune responses and subsequent disease trajectories. By explicitly representing drug-host-pathogen interactions, it provides a mechanistic basis for in silico treatment simulations and for the study of long-term immune consequences of antimicrobial therapy.

systems biology↗

Critical nodes reveal peculiar features of human essential genes and protein interactome

Network-based ranking methods (e.g., centrality analysis) have found extensive use in systems biology and network medicine for the prediction of essential proteins, for the prioritization of drug targets candidates in the treatment of several pathologies and in biomarker discovery, and for human disease genes identification. We here studied the connectivity of the human protein-protein interaction network (i.e., the interactome) to find the nodes whose removal has the heaviest impact on the network, i.e., maximizes its fragmentation. Such nodes are known as Critical Nodes (CNs). Specifically, we implemented a Critical Node Heuristic (CNH) and compared its performance against other four heuristics based on well known centrality measures. To better understand the structure of the interactome, the CNs role played in the network, and the different heuristics capabilities to grasp biologically relevant nodes, we compared the sets of nodes identified as CNs by each heuristic with two experimentally validated sets of essential genes, i.e., the genes whose removal impact on a given organisms ability to survive. Our results show that classical centrality measures (i.e., closeness centrality, degree) found more essential genes with respect to CNH on the current version of the human interactome, however the removal of such nodes does not have the greatest impact on interactome connectivity, while, interestingly, the genes identified by CNH show peculiar characteristics both from the topological and the biological point of view. Finally, even if a relevant fraction of essential genes is found via the classical centrality measures, the same measures seem to fail in identifying the whole set of essential genes, suggesting once again that some of them are not central in the network, that there may be biases in the current interaction data, and that different, combined graph theoretical and other techniques should be applied for their discovery.

bioinformatics↗