bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Martini, K. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Martini, K. M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

ROOTQUANT: AUTOMATED ROOT TRAIT QUANTIFICATION FROMMINIRHIZOTRON IMAGES USING DEEP LEARNING

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWQuantifying root traits such as root length (RL) and root surface area (RSA) from minirhizotron imagery is a valuable approach for overcoming the phenotyping bottleneck that limits understanding and improvement of crop productivity, resource use efficiency and resilience in field experiments. However, current approaches remain labor-intensive, and deep learning (DL) methods suffer from limited generalization ability. We present RootQuant, an end-to-end DL model that simultaneously predicts RL and RSA directly from minirhizotron images using only whole-image trait values as supervision, thereby eliminating the need for pixel-level annotations. The models generalization ability was evaluated across species and fine-tuning configurations. The practical applicability of the model was further assessed under field conditions by converting image-derived RL estimates into volumetric root length density (vRLD). Using 118,191 maize and soybean images collected between 2009 and 2020, RootQuant trained on both species achieved an R2 of 0.90 and an RMSE of 2.9 mm for RL, and an R2 of 0.88 and an RMSE of 4.2 mm2 for RSA. The same mixed-species model generalized strongly across species, yielding an 8% relative improvement in R2 and a 30% lower RMSE on maize compared with the same architecture trained on a single species and applied zero-shot. Image-derived RL predictions converted to vRLD showed the expected depth-dependent decline in vRLD, as was also found by coincident destructive quantification of roots washed out of soil cores. By providing a generalist backbone model trained on a large dataset from two major crop species, RootQuant enables high-throughput simultaneous estimation of two relevant root traits directly from raw imagery without task-specific fine-tuning, thereby accelerating in situ root system analysis and phenotyping applications.

plant biology↗

Variance in C. elegans gut bacterial load suggests complex host-microbe dynamics

Variation in bacterial composition inside a host is a result of complex dynamics of microbial community assembly, but little is known about these dynamics. To deconstruct the factors that contribute to this variation, we used a combination of experimental and modeling approaches. We found that demographic stochasticity and stationary heterogeneity in the host carrying capacity or bacterial growth rate are insufficient to explain quantitatively the variation observed in our empirical data. Instead, we found that the data can be understood if the host-bacteria system can be viewed as stochastically switching between high and low growth rates phenotypes. This suggests the dynamics significantly more complex than logistic growth used in canonical models of microbiome assembly. We develop mathematical models of this process that can explain various aspects of our data. We highlight the limitations of snapshot data in describing variation in host-associated communities and the importance of using time-series data along with mathematical models to understand microbial dynamics within a host.

biophysics↗

Correlations in microbial abundance data reveal host-bacteria and bacteria-bacteria interactions jointly shaping the C. elegans microbiome

Compositional structure of host-associated microbiomes is potentially affected by interactions among the microbes and between the microbes and the host. To quantify the relative importance of these contributions to the microbiome composition and variation, here we analyze absolute abundance (count) data for a minimal eight-species native microbiome in the Caenorhabditis elegans intestine. We find that a simple neutral model only considering migration, birth, death, and competition for space among the bacteria can capture the means and variances of bacterial abundance, but not the experimental bacteria-bacteria covariances. We find that either bacteria-bacteria interactions or correlations among bacterial population dynamics parameters induced by the host can qualitatively recapitulate the observed correlations among bacterial taxa. However, neither model is uniquely or completely sufficient to explain the data. Further, we observe that different interactions are required to explain (co)variance data in microbiota associated with different host genotypes, suggesting different community dynamics associated with these host types. Finally, we find that many of these signals are obscured when data are converted to proportions from counts, consistent with a growing literature on the limitations of compositional data for inference of population dynamics. We end with discussing the limitations of Lotka-Volterra type assumptions for microbial community data analysis revealed by our results.

biophysics↗

Maximum Likelihood Estimators For Colony Forming Units

There is a recognized need to measure the abundance of microbes in hospital environments, in the sanitation industry, and in food preparation. Doctors, microbiologists, and food safety experts have been addressing this need by using serial dilution methods to grow bacterial colonies in small enough numbers to count and, from these counts, to infer bacterial concentrations measured in Colony Forming Units (CFUs). There are two primary types of such methods: plating bacteria on a growth medium and counting their resulting colonies or counting the number of tubes at a given dilution that have growth. Traditionally, these types of data have been analyzed separately using different analytic methods. Here we build a direct correspondence between these approaches, which allows one to extend the use of the Most Probable Number (MPN) method from the liquid tubes experiments, for which it was developed, to the growth plates. We also discuss how to combine measurements taken at different dilutions, and we review several ways of analyzing colony counts, including the Poison and truncated Poison methods. For all methods, we discuss their relevant error bounds, assumptions, strengths, and weaknesses. We provide an online calculator for these estimators.

biophysics↗