Biology subjects

Martinez-Zalacain, I.

Publications and source records attributed to Martinez-Zalacain, I..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Disrupted Higher-Order Topology in OCD Brain Networks Revealed by Hodge Laplacian - an ENIGMA Study

Brain disorders are increasingly understood as disorders of distributed brain circuits, yet functional connectivity (FC), the dominant framework for mapping them, treats the brain as a collection of pairwise relationships between regions and cannot represent pathology distributed across coordinated sets of connections. We introduce a Hodge-Laplacian topological framework that localizes higher-order "loop" (1-cycle) organization within functional connectome, maps each loop to specific edges and networks, and yields a subject-level measure of loop expression. Applied to resting-state fMRI from the ENIGMA-OCD consortium (1,024 patients and 1,028 controls across 28 sites), the framework identified 93 loop-level abnormalities in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), concentrated in frontoparietal and somatomotor systems. The edges forming these loops largely showed no significant differences between groups, indicating that the abnormalities were invisible to conventional FC analysis. The frontoparietal and somatomotor loop clusters recurred across the clinical subgroups, suggesting convergence on a shared higher-order phenotype. Robustness analyses showed the loop signal reflected higher-order organization rather than an artifact of individual edges, the network backbone, or any single site. These results indicate that coordinated, multi-edge pathology exists and can be localized even when pairwise analyses fail to detect it, positioning higher-order topology as a generalizable axis for mapping circuit pathology across psychiatric and neurological disorders.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Inhibitory control and error processing in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A mega-analysis of task-based fMRI data by the ENIGMA-OCD consortium

ObjectiveObsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic condition in which impaired inhibitory control and excessive error monitoring may contribute to the maintenance of obsessions and compulsions. This mega-analysis investigates neural activation during response inhibition and error processing using adult and pediatric data from the ENIGMA-OCD consortium and the ABCD study. MethodsIndividual participant data was uniformly processed using HALFpipe to extract statistical maps for response inhibition and error processing contrasts. Bayesian multilevel models were used to assess regional and whole-brain effects of OCD, with additional analyses examining the association between the OCD clinical profile and task-related activation. ResultsAcross inhibitory control tasks, both individuals with OCD and control participants showed robust activation in regions implicated in response inhibition and error processing. During response inhibition, compared to controls, adults with OCD showed stronger somatomotor cortex activation, while children with OCD showed stronger occipital cortex activation. Children with likely OCD from the ABCD cohort showed reduced activity in the frontoparietal network in the anterior insula/frontal operculum region. During error processing, relative to controls, adults with OCD showed weaker activation in fronto-striatal regions, while children with OCD showed stronger activation in frontoparietal and attention networks. Greater OCD symptom severity was associated with weaker task-related activation in adults and stronger activation in children during response inhibition. ConclusionCase-control differences in brain activation during inhibitory control varied by age group and task contrast. Symptom severity emerged as the main clinical correlate of activation during inhibition, suggesting that inhibitory control deficits in OCD may be both state-dependent and developmentally specific.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Executive control in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A worldwide mega-analysis of task-based functional neuroimaging data of the ENIGMA-OCD consortium

ObjectiveObsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is associated with impaired executive function and altered activity in associated neural circuits, contributing to reduced goal-directed behavior. To investigate neural activation during executive control, we conducted a mega-analysis in the ENIGMA-OCD consortium pooling individual participant data from 475 individuals with OCD and 345 healthy controls across 15 fMRI tasks collected worldwide. MethodsIndividual participant data was uniformly processed using HALFpipe to construct voxelwise statistical images of executive control and task load contrasts. Parameter estimates extracted from regions of interest were entered into multilevel Bayesian models to examine regional and whole-brain effects of diagnosis, and, within OCD, the influence of medication status, symptom severity, and age of onset on task activation. ResultsWe observed a robust task activation pattern across individuals with OCD and control participants in executive control regions across tasks. Relative to controls, individuals with OCD showed moderate to very strong evidence of weaker activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, precuneus, frontal eye fields, and inferior parietal lobule during executive control (all positive posterior probabilities [P+]<0.1). Individuals with OCD also showed stronger activation in regions of the default mode network during executive function relative to controls. We found little evidence for differential activation during executive control in task- positive regions related to disease onset, severity and medication status. ConclusionIn the first mega-analysis of fMRI studies of executive function in OCD, we found strong evidence of weaker frontoparietal activation during executive control tasks. Our findings also suggest a failure of default mode network regions to appropriately disengage during task performance in OCD.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

A common neural network among state, trait, and pathological anxiety from whole-brain functional connectivity

Anxiety is one of the most common mental states of humans. Although it drives us to avoid frightening situations and to achieve our goals, it may also impose significant suffering and burden if it becomes extreme. Because we experience anxiety in a variety of forms, previous studies investigated neural substrates of anxiety in a variety of ways. These studies revealed that individuals with high state, trait, or pathological anxiety showed altered neural substrates. However, no studies have directly investigated whether the different dimensions of anxiety share a common neural substrate, despite its theoretical and practical importance. Here, we investigated a neural network of anxiety shared by different dimensions of anxiety in a unified analytical framework using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We analyzed different datasets in a single scale, which was defined by an anxiety-related neural network derived from whole brain. Through the fMRI task for provoking anxiety, we found a common neural network of state anxiety across participants (1,638 trials obtained from 10 participants). Then, using the resting-state fMRI in combination with the participants trait anxiety scale (879 participants from the Human Connectome Project), we demonstrated that trait anxiety also shared the same neural network as state anxiety. Furthermore, the common neural network between state and trait anxiety could detect patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, which is characterized by pathological anxiety-driven behaviors (174 participants from multi-site datasets). Our findings provide direct evidence that different dimensions of anxiety are not completely independent but have a substantial biological inter-relationship. Our results also provide a biologically defined dimension of anxiety, which may promote further investigation of various human characteristics, including psychiatric disorders, from the perspective of anxiety.

neuroscience↗