Biology subjects

Martinez, J. D.

Publications and source records attributed to Martinez, J. D..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Quantifying and mitigating recorder-induced variability in ecological acoustic indices

Due to the complexity of soundscapes, Ecological Acoustic indices (EAI) are frequently used as metrics to summarize ecologically meaningful information from audio recordings. Recent technological advances have allowed the rapid development of many audio recording devices with significant hardware/firmware variations among brands, whose effects in calculating EAI have not yet be determined. In this work, we show how recordings of the same landscape with different devices effectively hinder reproducibility and produce contradictory results. To address these issues, we propose a preprocessing pipeline to reduce EAI variability resulting from different hardware without altering the target information in the audio. To this end, we tested eight EAI commonly used in soundscape analyses. We targeted three common cases of variability caused by recorder characteristics: sampling frequency, microphone gain variation, and frequency response. We quantified the difference in the probability density functions of each index among recorders according to the Kullback-Leibler divergence. As a result, our approach reduced up to 75% variations among recorders from different brands (AudioMoth and SongMeter) and identified the conditions in which these devices are comparable. In conclusion, we demonstrated that different devices effectively affect EAI and show how these variations can be mitigated. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=130 SRC="FIGDIR/small/562620v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (38K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13defb9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14597d8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f3e795org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e90f2e_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG HighlightsO_LIAddressing recorder-induced biases in acoustic indices for improved reproducibility. C_LIO_LIProposing an effective method to mitigate recorder-related biases. C_LIO_LIEvaluating pipeline proposed performance via acoustic index distribution analysis. C_LI

bioengineering↗

bioRxiv2023

Hypnotic treatment reverses NREM sleep disruption and EEG desynchronization in a mouse model of Fragile X syndrome to rescue memory consolidation deficits.

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is a highly-prevalent genetic cause of intellectual disability, associated with disrupted cognition and sleep abnormalities. Sleep loss itself negatively impacts cognitive function, yet the contribution of sleep loss to impaired cognition in FXS is vastly understudied. One untested possibility is that disrupted cognition in FXS is exacerbated by abnormal sleep. We hypothesized that restoration of sleep-dependent mechanisms could improve functions such as memory consolidation in FXS. We examined whether administration of ML297, a hypnotic drug acting on G-protein-activated inward-rectifying potassium channels, could restore sleep phenotypes and improve disrupted memory consolidation in Fmr1-/y mice. Using 24-h polysomnographic recordings, we found that Fmr1-/y mice exhibit reduced non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep and fragmented NREM sleep architecture, alterations in NREM EEG spectral power (including reductions in sleep spindles), and reduced EEG coherence between cortical areas. These alterations were reversed in the hours following ML297 administration. Hypnotic treatment following contextual fear or spatial learning also ameliorated disrupted memory consolidation in Fmr1-/y mice. Hippocampal activation patterns during memory recall was altered in Fmr1-/y mice, reflecting an altered balance of activity among principal neurons vs. parvalbumin-expressing (PV+) interneurons. This phenotype was partially reversed by post-learning ML297 administration. These studies suggest that sleep disruption could have a major impact on neurophysiological and behavioral phenotypes in FXS, and that hypnotic therapy may significantly improve disrupted cognition in this disorder.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Reactivation of memory-encoding dentate gyrus neurons during memory consolidation is associated with subregion-specific, learning- and sleep-mediated biosynthetic changes

Post-learning sleep is essential for hippocampal memory processing, including contextual fear memory (CFM) consolidation. We used targeted recombination in activated populations (TRAP) to label context-encoding engram neurons in the hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG) and assessed reactivation of these neurons after fear learning. Post-learning sleep deprivation (SD), which impairs CFM consolidation, selectively disrupted reactivation of inferior blade DG engram neurons. This change was linked to more general suppression of neuronal activity markers in the inferior, but not superior, DG blade by SD. To further characterize how learning and subsequent sleep or SD affect these (and other) hippocampal subregions, we used subregion-specific spatial profiling of transcripts and proteins. We found that transcriptomic responses to sleep loss differed greatly between hippocampal regions CA1, CA3, and DG inferior blade, superior blade, and hilus - with activity-driven transcripts, and those associated with cytoskeletal remodeling, selectively suppressed in the inferior blade. Critically, learning-driven transcriptomic changes, measured 6 h following contextual fear learning, were limited to the two DG blades, differed dramatically between the blades, and were absent from all other regions. These changes suggested an increase in glutamatergic receptor signaling, and a decrease in GABA receptor signaling, during CFM consolidation. Protein abundance across hippocampal subregions was also differentially impacted by learning and sleep, with most alterations to protein expression restricted to DG. Together, these data suggest that the DG is critical for sleep-dependent memory consolidation, and that the effects of sleep loss on the hippocampus are highly subregion-specific, even within the DG itself.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Atypical hypnotic compound ML297 restores sleep architecture following emotionally-valenced learning, to promote memory consolidation and hippocampal network activation during recall

Sleep plays a critical role in consolidating many forms of hippocampus-dependent memory. While various classes of hypnotic drugs have been developed in recent years, it remains unknown whether, or how, some of them affect sleep-dependent memory consolidation mechanisms. We find that ML297, a recently-developed candidate hypnotic agent targeting a new mechanism (activating GIRK1-subunit containing G-protein coupled inwardly rectifying potassium [GIRK] channels), alters sleep architecture in mice over the first 6 h following a single-trial learning event. Following contextual fear conditioning (CFC), ML297 reversed post-CFC reductions in NREM sleep spindle power and REM sleep amounts and architecture, renormalizing sleep features to what was observed at baseline, prior to CFC. Renormalization of post-CFC REM sleep latency, REM sleep amounts, and NREM spindle power were all associated with improved contextual fear memory (CFM) consolidation. We find that improvements in CFM consolidation due to ML297 are sleep-dependent, and are associated with increased numbers of highly-activated dentate gyrus (DG), CA1, and CA3 neurons during CFM recall. Together our findings suggest that GIRK1 channel activation restores normal sleep architecture - including REM sleep, which is normally suppressed following CFC - and increases the number of hippocampal neurons incorporated into the CFM engram during memory consolidation. Significance StatementBoth REM and NREM sleep are thought to be important for consolidating hippocampus-dependent memories. We find that GIRK1 activator ML297, administered after single-trial fear learning, restores REM sleep that is normally suppressed after learning fearful associations. This restoration is associated with improvements in fear memory storage, resulting in more robust hippocampus activation in the context of subsequent memory recall. Thus this drug, which also has antiepileptic and anxiolytic properties, may be useful for promoting normal, restorative sleep that benefits memory storage.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Binocular visual experience and sleep promote visual cortex plasticity and restore binocular vision in a mouse model of amblyopia

Amblyopia arises from an altered balance of input from the two eyes to the binocular zone of primary visual cortex (bV1) during childhood, causing long-lasting visual impairment. Amblyopia is commonly treated by patching the dominant eye, however, the relative impacts of monocular vs. binocular visual experiences on restoration of bV1 function remains unclear. Moreover, while sleep has been implicated in V1 plasticity in response to vision loss, its role in recovery from amblyopia is unknown. We used monocular deprivation (MD) in juvenile mice to model amblyopia in bV1. We compared recovery of visual responses for the two eyes among bV1 regular spiking (RS, putative principal) neurons and fast-spiking (FS, putative parvalbumin-expressing [PV+]) interneurons after identical-duration, identical-quality binocular recovery (BR) or monocular, reverse occlusion (RO) experiences. We find that BR is quantitatively superior to RO with respect to renormalizing both bV1 populations visual responses. However, this recovery was seen only in freely-sleeping mice; post-BR sleep deprivation prevented functional recovery. Thus, both binocular visual experience and subsequent sleep are required to optimally renormalize bV1 responses in a mouse model of amblyopia.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Binocular vs. monocular recovery experience differentially promote recovery from visual deficits in a mouse model of amblyopia

Altered visual experience during monocular deprivation (MD) profoundly changes in ocular dominance (OD) in the developing primary visual cortex (V1). MD-driven changes in OD are an experimental model of amblyopia, where early-life alterations in vision lead visual disruption in adulthood. Current treatments for amblyopia include patching of the dominant eye, and more recently-developed binocular therapies. However, the relative impact of monocular vs. binocular recovery experiences on recovery of function in V1 is not well understood. Using single-unit recording, we compared how binocular recovery [BR] or reverse occlusion [RO] of identical duration and content affects OD and visual response recovery in mouse binocular V1 after a period of MD. We also tested how BR and RO affected MD-driven alterations of parvalbumin expression, and visually-driven expression of cFos in parvalbumin-positive and negative neurons. Finally, we tested how BR and RO affected recovery of normal visual acuity for the two eyes in the context of visually-driven behavior. We find that BR is quantitatively superior with respect to normalization of V1 neurons OD, visually-driven cFos expression, and visual acuity for the two eyes. However, MD-driven changes in the firing rate and response properties of V1 principal neuron and fast-spiking interneuron populations do not recover fully after either BR or RO. Binocular matching of orientation preference also remains disrupted in V1 neurons after both forms of recovery experience. Thus BR and RO, analogs of differing treatment regimens for amblyopia, differentially impact various aspects of visual recovery in a mouse model for amblyopia. Significance StatementAmblyopia resulting from altered childhood eye function is a leading cause of lifelong vision loss. Treatment typically involves patching of the dominant eye (forcing monocular visual experience), and produces only partial recovery of vision. Using a well-established mouse model of amblyopia, we directly compared how two types of visual experiences influence recovery of visual function. Our findings suggest that binocular vs. monocular visual experience differentially effect restoration of normal visual responses in cortical neurons, visually-driven neuronal gene expression, and visual acuity. Understanding how the quality of recovery experience impacts visual system recovery in amblyopia should provide critical insights for clinical strategies for its treatment.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Evolutionary conserved canonical BMP activity controls cortical neurogenesis

The growth and evolutionary expansion of the cerebral cortex are defined by the spatial-temporal production of neurons, which itself depends on the decision of radial glial cells (RGCs) to self-amplify or to switch to neurogenic divisions. The mechanisms regulating these RGC fate decisions are still incompletely understood. Here we describe a novel and evolutionarily conserved role of the canonical BMP transcription factors SMAD1/5 in controlling neurogenesis and growth during corticogenesis. Reducing the expression of both SMAD1 and SMAD5 in neural progenitors at early mouse cortical development caused microcephaly and an increased production of early-born cortical neurons at the expense of late-born ones, which correlated with the premature differentiation and depletion of the pool of cortical progenitors. Gain- and loss-of-function experiments performed during early cortical neurogenesis in the chick revealed that SMAD1/5 activity supports self-amplifying RGC divisions and restrain the neurogenic ones. Furthermore, we demonstrate that SMAD1/5 stimulate RGC self-amplification through the positive post-transcriptional regulation of the Hippo signaling effector YAP. We anticipate this SMAD1/5-YAP signaling module to be fundamental in controlling growth and evolution of the amniote cerebral cortex.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2018

E proteins differentially co-operate with proneural bHLH transcription factors to sharpen neurogenesis

Basic HLH proteins heterodimerize with class I HLH/E proteins to promote transcription. Here we show that E proteins differentially co-operate with proneural bHLH transcription factors sharpening their neurogeneic activity. We find that inhibiting BMP signaling or its target ID2, in the chick embryo spinal cord, impairs the neuronal production from progenitors expressing ATOH1/ASCL1, but less severely that from progenitors expressing NEUROG1/2/PTF1a. We define the mechanisms of this differential response as a dual co-operation of E proteins with proneural proteins. E proteins synergize with bHLH proteins when acting on CAGSTG motifs, thereby facilitating the neurogenic activity of ASCL1/ATOH1 which preferentially bind to such motifs. Conversely, E proteins restrict the strong neurogenic potential of NEUROG1/2 by directly inhibiting their preferential binding to CADATG motifs. Since we find this mechanism to be conserved in corticogenesis, we propose this dual co-operation of E proteins with bHLH proteins as a novel though general feature of their mechanism of action.

developmental biology↗