Biology subjects

Marston, A. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Marston, A. L..

15 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

A Kinetochore-Associated Proteasome Pool Drives a Second Pathway of Cohesin Removal during Meiosis

Accurate chromosome segregation requires the spatiotemporally regulated removal of sister chromatid cohesion. Cohesin cleavage by the endopeptidase separase depends on destruction of its inhibitor securin by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and on phosphorylation-mediated priming of the cohesin kleisin subunit. Whether the UPS also contributes to cohesin priming has remained unknown. Here, we show that the 26S proteasome mediates cohesin removal during meiosis II through branches of two parallel pathways. Using separation-of-function mutants targeting either the proteasome's core or regulatory particles, we identify a proteasome function that is required specifically for centromeric cohesin removal during meiosis II but dispensable for separase activation. Defects in this proteasome function causes centromeric accumulation of phosphatase anchor shugoshin (Sgo1), impaired cleavage of meiotic kleisin Rec8, and frequent failure of sister chromatid segregation. Bypassing the requirement for Rec8 priming, either through a phosphomimetic rec8 allele or by separase-independent Rec8 cleavage, restores chromosome segregation, demonstrating that the proteasome mediates cohesin removal independently of its established role in activating separase. Consistent with a direct role, proteasomes localize prominently to kinetochores during meiosis II. Together, these findings identify the proteasome as a dual-function regulator that mediates both separase activation and cohesin priming, revealing how a single proteolytic machine coordinates the two molecular pathways underlying stepwise chromosome segregation during meiosis.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2026

A conserved mechanism for targeted cohesin loading organises specialised chromosomal domains

Cohesin organises chromosomes through loop extrusion, yet how cohesin loading is targeted to specific genomic regions to shape chromosome architecture remains poorly understood. Here, we identify a conserved mechanism that directs cohesin loading to specialised chromosomal domains in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mutation of a conserved interaction surface in the cohesin loader Scc4/Ssl3 abolishes cohesin enrichment at centromeres and ribosomal DNA while largely preserving cohesin levels along chromosome arms, demonstrating that domain-specific accumulation depends on targeted recruitment rather than global loading capacity. We further identify the nucleolar protein Dnt1 as a receptor for cohesin loading at rDNA and show that it is required for proper organisation of this domain. High-resolution MicroC-XL maps reveal that targeted cohesin loading positions loop-based interactions within pericentromeres and rDNA without disrupting larger-scale domain boundaries. Together, these findings show that domain-specific receptors acting through a conserved loader interface direct cohesin positioning and identify targeted loading as a conserved organising principle for specialised chromosomal domains.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2026

Multiple pathways couple kinetochore orientation to the meiotic spindle cycle

Meiosis generates haploid gametes from a diploid progenitor. In meiosis I, homologous chromosomes segregate while sister chromatids co-orient toward the same spindle pole. The mechanisms underlying this specialized segregation pattern remain incompletely understood. Here we identify pathways required for meiosis I chromosome segregation through a forward genetic screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We find that meiosis I is highly sensitive to perturbations in diverse components of the segregation machinery and define key functional interfaces within complexes important for this division. These include meiosis I-specific regulators that establish the specialized chromosome pattern, namely the monopolin complex that directs sister kinetochore co-orientation and the Spo13MOKIR-Cdc5Polo module that promotes meiosis I chromosome segregation. In addition, we identify mutations affecting the core segregation machinery, including the spindle pole body, spindle midzone, and outer kinetochore, which can disrupt coupling between the chromosome segregation program and the meiotic spindle cycle. Together, our findings reveal that multiple pathways coordinate chromosome segregation with the meiotic divisions and highlight the unique demands of meiosis I.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2025

Multi-nucleation in two-cell human embryos stems from spindle and metaphase plate incoherence in the first mitosis

The first embryonic division in humans is highly error-prone and a source of aneuploidies. Multi-nucleation is prevalent in two-cell human embryos, with unknown cause. Here, we live-image human zygotes to elucidate the features of the first mitosis that predispose embryos to multinucleation. We show that failure to collect chromosomes into a single mass and establish a bipolar spindle during zygotic metaphase leads to severe multi-nucleation. We find that KIF10/CENP-E kinesin activity is essential to prevent the formation of multiple spindle poles and to congress chromosomes onto a metaphase plate. Furthermore, although the spindle assembly checkpoint mediates a delay in response to a highly disorganised spindle, KIF10/CENP-E-inhibited embryos ultimately undergo the first mitosis with a chaotic anaphase. Therefore, defective chromosome congression in the zygote combined with a failure to sense this error cause multi-nucleation. Remarkably, multi-nucleation can be corrected during the second mitotic division in a KIF10/CENP-E-dependent manner. We suggest that multi-nucleation may be a safeguarding mechanism to prevent chromosome loss during the highly error-prone first embryonic mitosis.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2024

Molecular basis for condensin enrichment at pericentromeres

Faithful chromosome segregation requires packaging of the genome on both global and local scales. Condensin plays a crucial role at pericentromeres to resist spindle forces and ensure the bioriented attachment of kinetochores to microtubules in mitosis. Here we demonstrate that budding yeast condensin is recruited to pericentromeres through a direct interaction between its Ycg1 subunit and the pericentromeric adaptor protein, shugoshin (Sgo1). We identify a Short Linear Motif (SLiM), termed CR1, within the C-terminal region of Sgo1 which inserts into a conserved pocket on Ycg1. Disruption of this interface abolishes the Sgo1-condensin interaction, prevents condensin recruitment to pericentromeres and results in defective sister kinetochore biorientation in mitosis. Similar motifs to CR1 are found in known and potential condensin binding partners and the Ycg1 binding pocket is broadly conserved, including in the mammalian homolog CAP-G. Overall, we uncover the molecular mechanism that targets condensin to define a specialized chromosomal domain.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2024

Checkpoint-independent association of Mad3BUBR1 with Stu1CLASP directs homolog alignment in meiosis I

Gametes are produced via meiosis, a specialized cell division associated with frequent errors which cause birth defects and infertility. Uniquely in meiosis I, homologous chromosomes segregate to opposite poles, usually requiring their linkage by chiasmata, the products of crossover recombination1. The spindle checkpoint delays cell cycle progression until all chromosomes are properly attached to microtubules2 but the steps leading to the capture and alignment of chromosomes on the meiosis I spindle remain poorly understood. In budding yeast meiosis I, Mad2 and Mad3BUBR1 are equally important for spindle checkpoint delay, but biorientation of homologs on the meiosis I spindle requires Mad2, but not Mad3BUBR1 3,4. Here we show that Mad3BUBR1 promotes accurate meiosis I homolog segregation outside its canonical checkpoint role, independently of Mad2. We find that Mad3BUBR1 associates with the TOGL1 domain of Stu1CLASP, a conserved plus-end microtubule protein which is important for chromosome capture onto the spindle. Homologous chromosome pairs that are proficient in crossover formation, but which fail to biorient, rely on Mad3BUBR1-Stu1CLASP to ensure their efficient attachment to microtubules and segregation during meiosis I. Furthermore, we show that Mad3BUBR1-Stu1CLASP are essential to rescue the segregation of mini-chromosomes lacking crossovers. Our findings define a new pathway ensuring microtubule-dependent chromosome capture and demonstrate that spindle checkpoint proteins safeguard the fidelity of chromosome segregation both by actively promoting chromosome alignment and delaying cell cycle progression until this has occurred.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2023

Rewiring of the phosphoproteome executes two meiotic divisions

The cell cycle is ordered by a controlled network of kinases and phosphatases. To generate gametes via meiosis, two distinct and sequential chromosome segregation events occur without an intervening S phase. How canonical cell cycle controls are modified for meiosis is not well understood. Here, using highly synchronous budding yeast populations, we reveal how the global proteome and phosphoproteome changes during the meiotic divisions. While protein abundance changes are limited to key cell cycle regulators, dynamic phosphorylation changes are pervasive. Our data indicate that two waves of cyclin-dependent kinase and Polo (Cdc5Polo) kinase activity drive successive meiotic divisions. These two distinct waves of phosphorylation are ensured by the meiosis-specific Spo13Meikin protein, which rewires the phosphoproteome. Spo13Meikin binds to Cdc5Polo to promote phosphorylation of a subset of substrates in meiosis I containing a newly identified motif, which we define as the Spo13Meikin -Cdc5Polo consensus phosphorylation motif. Overall, our findings reveal that a master regulator of meiosis redirects the activity of a kinase to change the phosphorylation landscape and elicit a developmental cascade.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2023

Age-dependent loss of cohesion protection in human oocytes

Aneuploid human eggs (oocytes) are a major cause of infertility, miscarriage and chromosomal disorders. Such aneuploidies increase greatly as women age, originating from defective linkages between sister-chromatids (cohesion) in meiosis. We found evidence that loss of a specific pool of the cohesin protector protein, shugoshin 2 (Sgo2) contributes to this phenomenon. Our data indicate that Sgo2 preserves sister chromatid cohesion in meiosis by protecting a cohesin bridge between sister chromatids. In human oocytes, Sgo2 localizes to both sub-centromere cups and the pericentromeric bridge which spans the sister chromatid junction. Sgo2 normally colocalizes with cohesin, however, in oocytes from older women, Sgo2 is frequently lost specifically from the pericentromeric bridge and sister chromatid cohesion is weakened. Mps1 and Bub1 kinase activities maintain Sgo2 at sub-centromeres and the pericentromeric bridge. Removal of Sgo2 throughout meiosis I by Mps1 inhibition reduces cohesion protection, increasing the incidence of single chromatids at meiosis II. Therefore, Sgo2 deficiency in human oocytes can exacerbate the effects of maternal age by rendering residual cohesin at pericentromeres vulnerable to loss in anaphase I. Our data show that maternal age-dependent loss of Sgo2 at the pericentromere bridge in human oocytes impairs cohesion integrity and contributes to the increased incidence of aneuploidy observed in human oocytes with advanced maternal age.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Eco1-dependent cohesin acetylation anchors chromatin loops and cohesion to define functional meiotic chromosome domains

Cohesin organizes the genome by forming intra-chromosomal loops and inter-sister chromatid linkages. During gamete formation by meiosis, chromosomes are reshaped to support crossover recombination and two consecutive rounds of chromosome segregation. Here we show that Eco1 acetyltransferase positions both chromatin loops and sister chromatid cohesion to organize meiotic chromosomes into functional domains in budding yeast. Eco1 acetylates the Smc3 cohesin subunit in meiotic S phase to establish chromatin boundaries, independently of DNA replication. Boundary formation by Eco1 is critical for prophase exit and for the maintenance of cohesion until meiosis II, but is independent of the ability of Eco1 to antagonize the cohesin-release factor, Wpl1. Conversely, prevention of cohesin release by Wpl1 is essential for centromeric cohesion, kinetochore monoorientation and co-segregation of sister chromatids in meiosis I. Our findings establish Eco1 as a key determinant of chromatin boundaries and cohesion positioning, revealing how local chromosome structuring directs genome transmission into gametes.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2020

The proteomic landscape of centromeric chromatin reveals an essential role for the Ctf19CCAN complex in meiotic kinetochore assembly

Kinetochores direct chromosome segregation in mitosis and meiosis. Faithful gamete formation through meiosis requires that kinetochores take on new functions that impact homolog pairing, recombination and the orientation of kinetochore attachment to microtubules in meiosis I. Using an unbiased proteomics pipeline, we determined the composition of centromeric chromatin and kinetochores at distinct cell-cycle stages, revealing extensive reorganisation of kinetochores during meiosis. The data uncover a network of meiotic chromosome axis and recombination proteins that replace the microtubule-binding outer kinetochore sub-complexes during meiotic prophase. We show that this kinetochore remodelling in meiosis requires the Ctf19cCCAN inner kinetochore complex. Through functional analyses, we identify a Ctf19cCCAN-dependent kinetochore assembly pathway that is dispensable for mitotic growth, but becomes critical upon meiotic entry. Therefore, extensive kinetochore remodelling and a distinct assembly pathway direct the specialization of meiotic kinetochores for successful gametogenesis.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2020

A dCas9/CRISPR-based targeting system identifies a central role for Ctf19 in kinetochore-derived suppression of meiotic recombination

In meiosis, crossover formation between homologous chromosomes is essential for faithful segregation. However, improperly controlled or placed meiotic recombination can have catastrophic consequences on genome stability. Specifically, within centromeres and surrounding regions (i.e. pericentromeres), crossovers are associated with chromosome missegregation and developmental aneuploidy. In organisms ranging from yeast to humans, crossovers are repressed within (peri)centromeric regions. We previously identified a key role for the multi-subunit, kinetochore-associated Ctf19 complex (Ctf19c; the budding yeast equivalent of the human CCAN) in regulating pericentromeric crossover formation. Here, we develop a dCas9/CRISPR-based system that allows ectopic targeting of Ctf19c-subunits to a non-centromeric locus during meiosis. Using this approach, we query sufficiency in meiotic crossover suppression, and identify Ctf19 (the budding yeast homologue of vertebrate CENP-P) as a central mediator of kinetochore-associated crossover control. We show that the effect of Ctf19 is encoded in its NH2-terminal tail, and depends on residues known to be important for the recruitment of the Scc2-Scc4 cohesin regulator to kinetochores. We thus reveal a crucial determinant that links kinetochores to meiotic recombinational control. This work provides insight into localized control of meiotic recombination. Furthermore, our approach establishes a dCas9/CRISPR-based experimental platform that can be utilized to investigate and locally manipulate meiotic crossover control. This platform can easily be adapted in order to investigate other aspects of localized chromosome biology.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2019

Evolutionary repair: changes in multiple functional modules allow meiotic cohesin to support mitosis

Different members of the same protein family often perform distinct cellular functions. How much are these differing functions due to changes in a proteins biochemical activity versus changes in other proteins? We asked how the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, evolves when forced to use the meiosis-specific kleisin, Rec8, instead of the mitotic kleisin, Scc1, during the mitotic cell cycle. This perturbation impairs sister chromosome linkage and reduces reproductive fitness by 45%. We evolved 15 populations for 1750 generations, substantially increasing their fitness, and analyzed their genotypes and phenotypes. We found no mutations in Rec8, but many populations had mutations in the transcriptional mediator complex, cohesin-related genes, and cell cycle regulators that induce S phase. These mutations improve sister chromosome cohesion and slow genome replication in Rec8-expressing cells. We conclude that changes in known and novel partners allow proteins to improve their ability to perform new functions.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2019

SUMOylation targets shugoshin to stabilize sister kinetochore biorientation

The accurate segregation of chromosomes during mitosis relies on the attachment of sister chromatids to microtubules from opposite poles, called biorientation. Sister chromatid cohesion resists microtubule forces, generating tension which provides the signal that biorientation has occurred. How tension silences the surveillance pathways that prevent cell cycle progression and correct erroneous kinetochore-microtubule remains unclear. Here we identify SUMOylation as a mechanism that promotes anaphase onset upon biorientation. SUMO ligases modify the tension-sensing pericentromere-localized chromatin protein, shugoshin, to stabilize bioriented sister kinetochore-microtubule attachments. In the absence of SUMOylation, Aurora B kinase removal from kinetochores is delayed. Shugoshin SUMOylation prevents its binding to protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) and release of this interaction is important for stabilizing sister kinetochore biorientation. We propose that SUMOylation modulates the kinase-phosphatase balance within pericentromeres to inactivate the error correction machinery, thereby allowing anaphase entry in response to biorientation.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Spo13 prevents premature cohesin cleavage during meiosis

Meiosis produces gametes through two successive nuclear divisions, meiosis I and meiosis II. In contrast to mitosis and meiosis II, where sister chromatids are segregated, during meiosis I, homologous chromosomes are segregated. This requires the monopolar attachment of sister kinetochores and the loss of cohesion from chromosome arms, but not centromeres, during meiosis I. The establishment of both sister kinetochore mono-orientation and cohesion protection rely on the budding yeast meiosis I-specific Spo13 protein, the functional homolog of fission yeast Moa1 and mouse MEIKIN. Here we investigate the effects of loss of SPO13 on cohesion during meiosis I. Unlike wild type, cells lacking SPO13 fail to maintain the meiosis-specific cohesin subunit, Rec8, at centromeres and segregate sister chromatids to opposite poles during anaphase I. We show that the cohesin-destabilizing factor, Wpl1, is not primarily responsible for the loss of cohesion during meiosis I. Instead, premature loss of centromeric cohesin during anaphase I in spo13{Delta} cells relies on separase-dependent cohesin cleavage. Further, cohesin loss in spo13{Delta} anaphase I cells is blocked by forcibly tethering the regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase 2A, Rts1, to Rec8. Our findings indicate that separase-dependent cleavage of phosphorylated Rec8 causes premature cohesin loss in spo13{Delta} cells.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2018

The Molecular Basis of Monopolin Recruitment to the Kinetochore

In budding yeast meiosis I, the kinetochores of each sister chromatid pair are fused by the monopolin complex to mediate their monoorientation on the meiosis I spindle, enabling the biorientation and segregation of homologs. Monopolin forms a V-shaped complex with binding sites for the kinetochore protein Dsn1 at the apices of the V, suggesting that monopolin forms a physical bridge between the two sister kinetochores. Here, we reveal the molecular basis of the monopolin-kinetochore interaction and identify the key interfaces required for monopolin function at the kinetochore. The disordered N-terminus of budding-yeast Dsn1 unexpectedly possesses two binding motifs for the monopolin subunit Csm1, encompassing the previously-identified \"Box 1\" and \"Box 2-3\" regions of Dsn1. Strikingly, Dsn1 Box 1 and Box 2-3 bind the same conserved hydrophobic cavity on the monopolin complex subunit Csm1, suggesting that they are mutually exclusive for Csm1 binding, yet both regions are critical for monopolin function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiosis I. We find that Dsn1 Box 1 is an ancestral monopolin-binding motif that is conserved throughout fungi, including in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. In contrast, Box 2-3 is found only in species with sequence-defined point centromeres (S. cerevisiae and its close relatives), suggesting that this region contributes specifically to sister kinetochore crosslinking in meiosis I. Finally, we propose that phosphorylation of two conserved serine residues in Box 3 may stabilize monopolin at the kinetochore, providing a potential mechanism for enforcing specific sister kinetochore crosslinking in meiosis I.

cell biology↗