In Silico Molecular-Based Rationale for SARS-CoV-2 Spike Circulating Mutations Able to Escape Bamlanivimab and Etesevimab Monoclonal Antibodies
The purpose of this work was to provide an in silico molecular rationale of the role eventually played by currently circulating S-RBDCoV-2 mutations in evading the immune surveillance effects elicited by the two Eli Lilly LY-CoV555/bamlanivimab and LY-CoV016/etesevimab monoclonal antibodies. The main findings from this study and shows that, compared to the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, mutations E484A/G/K/Q/R/V, Q493K/L/R, S494A/P/R, L452R and F490S are predicted to be markedly resistant to neutralization by LY-CoV555, while mutations K417E/N/T, D420A/G/N, N460I/K/S/T, T415P, and Y489C/S are predicted to confer LY-CoV016 escaping advantage to the viral protein. A challenge of our global in silico results against the relevant experimental data resulted in an overall 90% agreement. This achievement not only constitutes a further, robust validation of our computer-based approach but also yields a molecular-based rationale for all relative experimental findings, and leads us to conclude that the current circulating SARS-CoV-2 and all possible emergent variants carrying these mutations in the spike protein can present new challenges for mAb-based therapies and ultimately threaten the fully-protective efficacy of currently available vaccines.