bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Marriott, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Marriott, P..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Variation of wine preference amongst consumers is influenced by the composition of salivary proteins

The preferences of consumers for different flavours and aromas in wine are varied and may be explained by inherent factors such as cultural background, wine education and personal taste of the wine consumer. Wine flavour as perceived in the mouth includes aroma compounds released through the retronasal pathway which are shaped by interactions with saliva. Saliva and wine interactions could provide an explanation as to why wine tasters express different preferences for wine. To test this hypothesis, 13 Western and 13 Chinese experienced wine tasters were recruited. Sensory evaluation was performed in formal surroundings to acquire free description-based and perceived sensory intensity data using the Pivot(R) Profile and continuous scale assessment, respectively. Participants saliva samples were collected before the sensory evaluation and spiked into a wine sample to investigate the impact on the wine volatile release using GCxGC-MS. Saliva samples were subjected to enzyme activity assays and protein composition profiling by Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) quantitative proteomics. The wine tasters showed differences in wine flavour perception, which was supported by the difference in wine volatile release resulting from the addition of saliva. The two groups of participants did not have significant differences in total salivary protein concentrations or the amounts of esterase and -amylase. However, statistically significant variations in the concentrations of specific proteins (proline-rich proteins (PRPs) and lipocalin-1 (LCN-1); p < 0.01) were found between the two groups. Significant correlations between perceived intensities of wine attributes and concentrations of PRPs and LCN-1 were observed. These results indicate that the composition of proteins in saliva are a factor that influences wine perception and preference. Our results provide a biochemical basis to understanding preference for food based on interactions between aroma compounds and salivary proteins and could be used to suggest foods or beverages to particular cultural groups.

biochemistry↗

Role of PIF4 and FLC in controlling flowering time under daily variable temperature profile

Initiation of flowering is a crucial developmental event that requires both internal and environmental signals to determine when floral transition should occur to maximize reproductive success. Ambient temperature is one of the key environmental signals that highly influence flowering time, not only seasonally but also in the context of drastic temperature fluctuation due to global warming. Molecular mechanisms of how high or low constant temperatures affect the flowering time have been largely characterized in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana; however, the effect of natural daily variable temperature outside laboratories is only partly explored. Several groups of flowering genes have been shown to play important roles in temperature responses, including two temperature-responsive transcription factors (TFs), namely PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR 4 (PIF4) and FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC), that act antagonistically to regulate flowering time by activating or repressing floral integrator FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT). In this study, we have demonstrated that the daily variable temperature (VAR) causes early flowering in both natural accessions Col-0, C24 and their late flowering hybrid C24xCol, which carries both functional floral repressor FLC and its activator FRIGIDA (FRI), as compared to a constant temperature (CON). The loss-of-function mutation of PIF4 exhibits later flowering in VAR, suggesting that PIF4 at least in part, contributes to acceleration of flowering in response to the daily variable temperature. We find that VAR increases PIF4 transcription at the end of the day when temperature peaks at 32 {degrees}C. The FT transcription is also elevated in VAR, as compared to CON, in agreement with earlier flowering observed in VAR. In addition, VAR causes a decrease in FLC transcription in 4-week-old plants, and we further show that overexpression of PIF4 can reduce FLC transcription, suggesting that PIF4 might also regulate FT indirectly through the repression of FLC. To further conceptualize an overall model of gene regulatory mechanisms involving PIF4 and FLC in controlling flowering in response to temperature changes, we construct a co-expression - transcriptional regulatory network by combining publicly available transcriptomic data and gene regulatory interactions of our flowering genes of interest and their partners. The network model reveals the conserved and tissue-specific regulatory functions of 62 flowering-time-relating genes, namely PIF4, PIF5, FLC, ELF3 and their immediate neighboring genes, which can be useful for confirming and predicting the functions and regulatory interactions between the key flowering genes.

plant biology↗