Biology subjects

Marc Manceau

Publications and source records attributed to Marc Manceau.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2016

The species problem from the modeler’s point of view

How to define a partition of individuals into species is a long-standing question called the species problem in systematics. Here, we focus on this problem in the thought experiment where individuals reproduce clonally and both the differentiation process and the population genealogies are explicitly known. We point out three desirable properties of species partitions: (A) Heterotypy between species, (B) Homotypy within species and (M) Monophyly of each species. We then ask: How and when is it possible to delineate species in a way satisfying these properties?\n\nWe point out that the three desirable properties cannot in general be satisfied simultaneously, but that any two of them can. We mathematically prove the existence of the finest partition satisfying (A) and (M) and the coarsest partition satisfying (B) and (M). For each of them, we propose a simple algorithm to build the associated phylogeny out of the genealogy.\n\nThe ways we propose to phrase the species problem shed new light on the interaction between the genealogical and phylogenetic scales in modeling work. The two definitions centered on the monophyly property can readily be used at a higher taxonomic level as well, e.g. to cluster species into monophyletic genera.

Evolutionary Biology↗

bioRxiv2016

A unifying comparative phylogenetic framework including traits coevolving across interacting lineages

Models of phenotypic evolution fit to phylogenetic comparative data are widely used to make inferences regarding the tempo and mode of trait evolution. A wide range of models is already available for this type of analysis, and the field is still under active development. One of the most needed developments concerns models that better account for the effect of within- and between-clade interspecific interactions on trait evolution, that can result from processes as diverse as competition, predation, parasitism, or mutualism. Here, we begin by developing a very general comparative phylogenetic framework for (multi)-trait evolution that can be applied to both ultrametric and non-ultrametric trees. This framework not only encapsulates all previous classical models of univariate and multivariate phenotypic evolution, but also paves the way for the consideration of a much broader series of models in which lineages co-evolve, meaning that trait changes in one lineage are influenced by the value of traits in other, interacting lineages. Next, we provide a standard way for deriving the probabilistic distribution of traits at tip branches under our framework. We show that a multivariate normal distribution remains the expected distribution for a broad class of models accounting for interspecific interactions. Our derivations allow us to fit various models efficiently, and in particular greatly reduce the computation time needed to fit the recently proposed phenotype matching model. Finally, we illustrate the utility of our framework by developing a toy model for mutualistic coevolution. Our framework should foster a new era in the study of coevolution from comparative data.

Evolutionary Biology↗

bioRxiv2015

Estimating the effect of competition on trait evolution using maximum likelihood inference

Many classical ecological and evolutionary theoretical frameworks posit that competition between species is an important selective force. For example, in adaptive radiations, resource competition between evolving lineages plays a role in driving phenotypic diversification and exploration of novel ecological space. Nevertheless, current models of trait evolution fit to phylogenies and comparative datasets are not designed to incorporate the effect of competition. The most advanced models in this direction are diversity-dependent models where evolutionary rates depend on lineage diversity. However, these models still treat changes in traits in one branch as independent of the value of traits on other branches, thus ignoring the effect of species similarity on trait evolution. Here, we consider a model where the evolutionary dynamics of traits involved in interspecific interactions are influenced by species similarity in trait values and where we can specify which lineages are in sympatry. We develop a maximum-likelihood based approach to fit this model to combined phylogenetic and phenotypic data. Using simulations, we demonstrate that the approach accurately estimates the simulated parameter values across a broad range of parameter space. Additionally, we develop tools for specifying the biogeographic context in which trait evolution occurs. In order to compare models, we also apply these biogeographic methods to specify which lineages interact sympatrically for two diversity-dependent models. Finally, we fit these various models to morphological data from a classical adaptive radiation (Greater Antillean Anolis lizards). We show that models that account for competition and geography perform better than other models. The matching competition model is an important new tool for studying the influence of interspecific interactions, in particular competition, on phenotypic evolution. More generally, it constitutes a step toward a better integration of interspecific interactions in many ecological and evolutionary processes.

Evolutionary Biology↗