bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Marantz, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Marantz, A..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Dynamics of pitch perception in the auditory cortex

The ability to perceive pitch allows human listeners to experience music, recognize the identity and emotion conveyed by conversational partners, and make sense of their auditory environment. A pitch percept is formed by weighting different acoustic cues (e.g., signal fundamental frequency and inter-harmonic spacing) and contextual cues (expectation). How and when such cues are neurally encoded and integrated remains debated. In this study, twenty-eight participants (16 female) listened to tone sequences with different acoustic cues (pure tones, complex missing fundamental tones, and tones with an ambiguous mixture), placed in predictable and less predictable sequences, while magnetoencephalography was recorded. Decoding analyses revealed that pitch was encoded in neural responses to all three tone types, in the low-to-mid auditory cortex and sensorimotor cortex bilaterally, with right-hemisphere dominance. The pattern of activity generalized across cue-types, offset in time: pitch was neurally encoded earlier for harmonic tones ([~]85ms) than pure tones ([~]95ms). For ambiguous tones, pitch emerged significantly earlier in predictable contexts than unpredictable. The results suggest that a unified neural representation of pitch emerges by integrating independent pitch cues, and that context alters the dynamics of pitch generation when acoustic cues are ambiguous. Significance StatementPitch enables humans to enjoy music, understand the emotional intent of a conversational partner, distinguish lexical items in tonal languages, and make sense of the acoustic environment. The study of pitch has lasted over a century, with conflicting accounts of how and when the brain integrates spectrotemporal information to map different sound sources onto a single and stable pitch percept. Our results answer crucial questions about the emergence of perceptual pitch in the brain: namely, that place and temporal cues to pitch seem to be accounted for by early auditory cortex, that a common representation of perceptual pitch emerges early in the right hemisphere, and that the temporal dynamics of pitch representations are modulated by expectation.

neuroscience↗

Neural bases of proactive and predictive processing of meaningful sub-word units in speech comprehension

To comprehend speech, human brains identify meaningful units in the speech stream. But whereas the English She believed him. has 3 words, the Arabic equivalent saddaqathu. is a single word with 3 meaningful sub-word units, called morphemes: a verb stem ( saddaqa), a subject suffix ( -t-), and a direct object pronoun ( -hu). It remains unclear whether and how the brain processes morphemes, above and beyond other language units, during speech comprehension. Here, we propose and test hierarchically-nested encoding models of speech comprehension: a NAIVE model with word-, syllable-, and sound-level information; a BOTTOM-UP model with additional morpheme boundary information; and PREDICTIVE models that process morphemes before these boundaries. We recorded magnetoencephalography (MEG) data as participants listened to Arabic sentences like saddaqathu.. A temporal response function (TRF) analysis revealed that in temporal and left inferior frontal regions PREDICTIVE models outperform the BOTTOM-UP model, which outperforms the NAIVE model. Moreover, verb stems were either length-AMBIGUOUS (e.g., saddaqa could initially be mistaken for the shorter stem sadda= blocked) or length-UNAMBIGUOUS (e.g., qayyama= evaluated cannot be mistaken for a shorter stem), but shared a uniqueness point, at which stem identity is fully disambiguated. Evoked analyses revealed differences between conditions before the uniqueness point, suggesting that, rather than await disambiguation, the brain employs PROACTIVE PREDICTIVE strategies, processing the accumulated input as soon as any possible stem is identifiable, even if not unique. These findings highlight the role of morpheme processing in speech comprehension, and the importance of including morpheme-level information in neural and computational models of speech comprehension. Significance statementMany leading models of speech comprehension include information about words, syllables and sounds. But languages vary considerably in the amount of meaning packed into word units. This work proposes speech comprehension models with information about meaningful sub-word units, called morphemes (e.g., bake- and -ing in baking), and shows that they explain significantly more neural activity than models without morpheme information. We also show how the brain predictively processes morphemic information. These findings highlight the role of morphemes in speech comprehension and emphasize the contributions of morpheme-level information-theoretic metrics, like surprisal and entropy. Our models can be used to update current neural, cognitive, and computational models of speech comprehension, and constitute a step towards refining those models for naturalistic, connected speech.

neuroscience↗

Hierarchical dynamic coding coordinates speech comprehension in the brain

Speech comprehension involves transforming an acoustic waveform into meaning. To do so, the human brain generates a hierarchy of features that converts the sensory input into increasingly abstract language properties. However, little is known about how rapid incoming sequences of hierarchical features are continuously coordinated. Here, we propose that each language feature is supported by a dynamic neural code, which represents the sequence history of hierarchical features in parallel. To test this Hierarchical Dynamic Coding (HDC) hypothesis, we use time-resolved decoding of brain activity to track the construction, maintenance, and update of a comprehensive hierarchy of language features spanning phonetic, word form, lexical-syntactic, syntactic and semantic representations. For this, we recorded 21 native English participants with magnetoencephalography (MEG), while they listened to two hours of short stories in English. Our analyses reveal three main findings. First, the brain represents and simultaneously maintains a sequence of hierarchical features. Second, the duration of these representations depends on their level in the language hierarchy. Third, each representation is maintained by a dynamic neural code, which evolves at a speed commensurate with its corresponding linguistic level. This HDC preserves the maintenance of information over time while limiting destructive interference between successive features. Overall, HDC reveals how the human brain maintains and updates the continuously unfolding language hierarchy during natural speech comprehension, thereby anchoring linguistic theories to their biological implementations.

neuroscience↗

Same Sentences, Different Grammars, Different Brain Responses: An MEG study on Case and Agreement Encoding in Hindi and Nepali Split-Ergative Structures

At first glance, the brains language network appears to be universal, but languages clearly differ. How does the brain adapt to the specific details of individual grammatical systems? Here, we present an MEG study on case and agreement in Hindi and Nepali. Both languages use split-ergative case systems. However, these systems interact with verb agreement differently - in Hindi, case features conspire to determine which noun phrase (NP) the verb agrees with (subject, object, or neither), but in Nepali the verb always agrees with the subject NP. We found that left inferior frontal and left anterior temporal regions are sensitive to case features in both languages. Across case configurations, these same brain areas in Hindi participants show different patterns of activity for sentences that require masculine vs. feminine marking on the verb, before the comprehenders encounter it. Additionally, the left temporoparietal junction in Hindi shows different activity for subject and object agreement configurations. Both findings are not observed in Nepali participants. We suggest that this brain response demonstrates a unique-to-Hindi selection of an agreement controller and pre-encoding of the verbs morphological features. This shows that brain activity reflects psycholinguistic processes that are intimately tied to grammatical features. HighlightsO_LIThe left inferior frontal lobe and the left anterior temporal lobe distinguish accusative objects versus bare object NPs in Hindi and Nepali, and pre-emptively encode gender agreement features in Hindi. C_LIO_LIThe left inferior parietal lobe shows a differential sensitivity to object-agreement and subject-agreement constructions in Hindi that is absent in Nepali C_LIO_LIMEG can reveal differences in neural activity that reflect specific requirements of different grammatical systems C_LI

neuroscience↗

Top-down information flow drives lexical access when listening to continuous speech

Speech is often structurally and semantically ambiguous. Here we study how the human brain uses sentence context to resolve lexical ambiguity. Twenty-one participants listened to spoken narratives while magneto-encephalography (MEG) was recorded. Stories were annotated for grammatical word class (noun, verb, adjective) under two hypothesised sources of information: bottom-up: the most common word class given the words phonology; top-down: the correct word class given the context. We trained a classifier on trials where the hypotheses matched (about 90%) and tested the classifier on trials where they mismatched. The classifier predicted top-down word class labels, and anti-correlated with bottom-up labels. Effects peaked [~]100ms after word onset over mid-frontal MEG sensors. Phonetic information was encoded in parallel, though peaking later ([~]200ms). Our results support that during continuous speech processing, lexical representations are quickly built in a context-sensitive manner. We showcase multivariate analyses for teasing apart subtle representational distinctions from neural time series.

neuroscience↗

Neural dynamics of phoneme sequencing in real speech jointly encode order and invariant content

Speech consists of a continuously-varying acoustic signal. Yet human listeners experience it as a sequence of discrete units (phonemes and words). To identify how the brain continuously represents and updates speech units, we recorded two-hour magnetoencephalograms from 21 subjects listening to short narratives. Our encoding and decoding analyses show that the human brain uses a dynamic coding scheme to represent approximately three successive phonetic features at each time sample. These dynamic phonetic representations, not directly accessible from the acoustic signal, are active earlier when phonemes are more predictable, and are sustained when lexical identity is uncertain. The results reveal how phoneme sequences in natural speech are neurally represented and shed new light on how the human brain combines them to probe the mental lexicon. One sentence summaryThe human brain keeps track of the relative order of speech sound sequences by jointly encoding content and elapsed processing time

neuroscience↗

Neural adaptation to accented speech: prefrontal cortex aids attunement in auditory cortices

Speech is a complex and ambiguous acoustic signal that varies significantly within and across speakers. A prevalent and ubiquitous example of such variation is accented speech, to which humans adapt extremely rapidly. The goal of this study is to uncover the neurobiological bases of the attunement process that enables such fluent comprehension. Twenty-four native English participants listened to words spoken by an unaccented "canonical" American talker and two "accented" talkers, and performed a word-picture matching task, while magnetoencephalography (MEG) was recorded. Accented speech was created by including systematic phonological substitutions within the word (e.g. [s] [->] [sh]). Activity in the auditory cortex (superior temporal gyrus) was greater for accented speech, but, critically, this was not attenuated by exposure. By contrast, prefrontal regions showed an interaction between the presence of an accent and amount of exposure: while activity decreased for canonical speech over time, responses to accented speech remained consistently elevated. Grainger causality analyses further revealed that prefrontal responses serve to modulate activity in auditory regions, suggesting the recruitment of top-down processing to decode accented signal. In sum, our results show that accented speech does not elicit the same prefrontal reduction in amplitude over time that unaccented speech does, and points to a dynamic exchange of information between the prefrontal and auditory cortices in order to recalculate phonetic classification and subsequent identification of lexical items. Significance statementHuman ability to adapt to different peoples idiosyncratic pronunciations is a hallmark of speech comprehension. This study aims to address whether adaptation to speakers accents manifests itself at the perceptual level (i.e. through adaptation of low-level neural responses in the auditory cortex) or at the post-perceptual level (i.e. higher-order regions correcting the sensory signal received from auditory cortex). Our results support the post-perceptual hypothesis: we found that responses in auditory cortex emitted an error-like signal that was invariant to exposure; whereas responses in the prefrontal cortex were modulated by exposure. These findings provide initial insight into accent adaptation, and illuminate the computational stages supporting speech comprehension more generally.

neuroscience↗

In spoken word recognition the future predicts the past

Speech is an inherently noisy and ambiguous signal. In order to fluently derive meaning, a listener must integrate contextual information to guide interpretations of the sensory input. While many studies have demonstrated the influence of prior context, the neural mechanisms supporting the integration of subsequent information remain unknown. Using magnetoencephalography, we analysed responses to spoken words with a varyingly ambiguous onset phoneme, the identity of which is later disambiguated at the lexical uniqueness point1. Our results uncover a three-level processing network. Subphonemic detail is preserved in primary auditory cortex over long timescales, and re-evoked at subsequent phoneme positions. Commitments to phonological categories occur in parallel, resolving on the shorter time-scale of ~450 ms. Finally, predictions are formed over likely lexical items. These findings provide evidence that future input determines the perception of earlier speech sounds by maintaining sensory features until they can be optimally integrated with top-down information.

neuroscience↗