bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Mannella, F.

Publications and source records attributed to Mannella, F..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Learning to segment self-generated from externally caused optic flow through sensorimotor mismatch circuits

Efficient sensory detection requires the capacity to ignore task-irrelevant information, for example when optic flow patterns created by egomotion need to be disentangled from object perception. To investigate how this is achieved in the visual system, predictive coding with sensorimotor mismatch detection is an attractive starting point. Indeed, experimental evidence for sensorimotor mismatch signals in early visual areas exists, but it is not understood how they are integrated into cortical networks that perform input segmentation and categorization. Our model advances a biologically plausible solution by extending predictive coding models with the ability to distinguish self-generated from externally caused optic flow. We first show that a simple three neuron circuit produces experience-dependent sensorimotor mismatch responses, in agreement with calcium imaging data from mice. This microcircuit is then integrated into a neural network with two generative streams. The motor-to-visual stream consists of parallel microcircuits between motor and visual areas and learns to spatially predict optic flow resulting from self-motion. The second stream bidirectionally connects a motion-selective higher visual area (mHVA) to V1, assigning a crucial role to the abundant feedback connections: the maintenance of a generative model of externally caused optic flow. In the model, area mHVA learns to segment moving objects from the background, and facilitates object categorization. Based on shared neurocomputational principles across species, the model also maps onto primate vision. Our work extends the Hebbian predictive coding to sensorimotor settings, in which the agent actively moves - and learns to predict the consequences of its own movements. Significance statementThis research addresses a fundamental challenge in sensory perception: how the brain distinguishes between self-generated and externally caused visual motion. Using a computational model inspired by predictive coding and sensorimotor mismatch detection, the study proposes a biologically plausible solution. The model incorporates a neural microcircuit that generates sensorimotor mismatch responses, aligning with experimental data from mice. This microcircuit is integrated into a neural network with two streams: one predicting self-motion-induced optic flow and another maintaining a generative model for externally caused optic flow. The research advances our understanding of how the brain segments visual input into object and background, shedding light on the neural mechanisms underlying perception and categorization not only in rodents, but also in primates.

neuroscience↗

Interactions between supervised and reinforcement learning processes in a neurorobotic model

Several influential works propose that the acquisition of motor behavior involves different learning mechanisms in the brain, in particular supervised and reinforcement learning, that are respectively associated with cerebellar-thalamocortical and basal ganglia-thalamocortical networks. Despite increasing evidence suggesting anatomical and functional interactions between these circuits, the learning processes operating within them are studied in isolation, neglecting their strong interdependence. This article proposes a bio-inspired neurorobotic model implementing a possible cooperation mechanism between supervised and reinforcement learning. The model, validated with empirical data from healthy participants and patients with cerebellar ataxia, shows how the integration of the two learning processes could lead to benefit both learning performance and movement accuracy.

bioengineering↗

Active inference through whiskers

Rodents use whisking to probe actively their environment and to locate objects in space, hence providing a paradigmatic biological example of active sensing. Numerous studies show that the control of whisking has anticipatory aspects. For example, rodents target their whisker protraction to the distance at which they expect objects, rather than just reacting fast to contacts with unexpected objects. Here we characterize the anticipatory control of whisking in rodents as an active inference process. In this perspective, the rodent is endowed with a prior belief that it will touch something at the end of the whisker protraction, and it continuously modulates its whisking amplitude to minimize (proprioceptive and somatosensory) prediction errors arising from an unexpected whisker-object contact, or from a lack of an expected contact. We will use the model to qualitatively reproduce key empirical findings about the ways rodents modulate their whisker amplitude during exploration and the scanning of (expected or unexpected) objects. Furthermore, we will discuss how the components of active inference model can in principle map to the neurobiological circuits of rodent whisking.

animal behavior and cognition↗