bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Manickam, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Manickam, K..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Experimental safety testing confirms that the NSAID nimesulide is toxic to Gyps vultures in India

Population declines of Gyps vultures throughout South Asia were caused by unintentional poisoning by the NSAID diclofenac, which was subsequently banned. However, other vulture-toxic NSAIDs are available, including nimesulide, which, in experiments carried out in South Africa, was shown to be toxic to Gyps vultures. We report on safety-testing of nimesulide carried out on Himalayan Griffons G. himalayensis. We gave two vultures a dose of nimesulide by oral gavage at the maximum level of exposure, with two controls dosed with benzyl alcohol. In the two tested birds, plasma nimesulide concentrations peaked after six hours, while serum uric acid concentrations increased steadily up until 24 hours post-treatment, after which both birds died, displaying severe visceral gout. The control birds showed no adverse clinical or biochemical signs. We confirm that nimesulide is toxic to Gyps vultures. Veterinary use of nimesulide should be banned in all Gyps vulture range countries in the region.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

HPC-based genome variant calling workflow (HPC-GVCW)

A high-performance computing genome variant calling workflow was designed to run GATK on HPC platforms. This workflow efficiently called an average of 27.3 M, 32.6 M, 168.9 M, and 16.2 M SNPs for rice, sorghum, maize, and soybean, respectively, on the most recently released high-quality reference sequences. Analysis of a rice pan-genome reference panel revealed 2.1 M novel SNPs that have yet to be publicly released.

genomics↗

Experimental safety testing shows that the NSAID tolfenamic acid is not toxic to Gyps vultures in India at concentrations likely to be encountered in cattle carcasses

Population declines of Gyps vultures across the Indian subcontinent were caused by unintentional poisoning by the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) diclofenac. Subsequently, a number of other NSAIDs have been identified as toxic to vultures, while one, meloxicam, is safe at concentrations likely to be encountered by vultures in the wild. Other vulture-safe drugs need to be identified to reduce the use of those toxic to vultures. We report on safety-testing experiments on the NSAID tolfenamic acid on captive vultures of three Gyps species, all of which are susceptible to diclofenac poisoning. Firstly, we estimated the maximum level of exposure (MLE) of wild vultures and gave this dose to 38 Near Threatened G. himalayensis by oral gavage, with 15 control birds dosed with benzyl alcohol (the carrier solution for tolfenamic acid). Two birds given tolfenamic acid died with elevated uric acid levels and severe visceral gout, while the remainder showed no adverse clinical or biochemical signs. Secondly, four G. himalayensis were fed tissues from water buffaloes which had been treated with double the recommended veterinary dose of tolfenamic acid prior to death and compared to two birds fed uncontaminated tissue; none suffered any clinical effects. Finally, two captive Critically Endangered vultures, one G. bengalensis and one G. Indicus, were given the MLE dose by gavage and compared to two control birds; again, none suffered any clinical effects. The death of two G. himalayensis may have been an anomaly due to i) the high dose level used and ii) the high ambient temperatures at the time of the experiment. Tolfenamic acid is likely to be safe to Gyps vultures at concentrations encountered by wild birds and could therefore be promoted as a safe alternative to toxic NSAIDs. It is manufactured in the region, and is increasingly being used to treat livestock.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

A Model for Genome-First Care: Returning Secondary Genomic Findings to Participants and Their Healthcare Providers in a Large Research Cohort

BackgroundResearch cohorts with linked genomic data exist, or are being developed, at many research centers. Within any such \"sequenced cohort\" of more than 100 participants, it is likely that there are participants with previously undisclosed risk for life-threatening monogenic diseases that could be identified with targeted analysis of their existing data. Identification of such disease-associated findings are not usually primary to the enrollment research goals. At Geisinger Health System, MyCode(R) Community Health Initiative (MyCode) participants represent one such large sequenced cohort. Since 2013, MyCode participants in discovery research have been consented for secondary analysis of their existing research genomic sequences to allow delivery of medically actionable findings to them and their healthcare providers. This return of genomic results program was developed to manage an anticipated 3.5% of MyCode participants who will receive clinically confirmed genomic variants from an approved gene list out of more than 150,000 total participants. Risk-associated DNA sequences alone without any clinical parameter, prompt \"genome-first\" follow-up encounters.\n\nMethodsThis article describes our process for generating clinical grade results from research-based genomic sequencing data, delivering results to patients and their providers, facilitating targeted clinical evaluations of patients and promoting cascade testing of at-risk relatives. We also summarize our early data about the results generated during this process and our ability to contact patients and their providers to disclose the information.\n\nResultsThis process has been used to generate 343 results on 339 patients. 93% of patients with a result have been successfully contacted about their results as evidenced by direct interaction about their result with the research team or a healthcare provider. 222 healthcare providers have been notified of a result on one or more patient through this result delivery process.\n\nConclusionsHere we describe the existing GHS model to deliver genomic data into the electronic medical record and the clinical interactions that are prompted and supported. Elements of this genome-first care model can be applied in other healthcare settings and in national efforts, such as \"All of Us\", that wish to establish programs for returning genomic results to research participants.

genomics↗