bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Mancuso, M. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Mancuso, M. E..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Relating Bone Strain to Local Changes in Radius Microstructure Following 12 Months of Axial Forearm Loading in Women

Work in animal models suggest that bone structure adapts to local bone strain, but this relationship has not been comprehensively studied in humans. Here, we quantified the influence of strain magnitude and gradient on bone adaptation in the forearm of premenopausal women performing compressive forearm loading (n=11) and non-loading controls (n=10). High resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) scans of the distal radius acquired at baseline and 12 months of a randomized controlled experiment were used to identify local sites of bone formation and resorption. Bone strain was estimated using validated finite element (FE) models. Trabecular strain magnitude and gradient were higher near (within 200 {micro}m) formation versus resorption (p<0.05). Trabecular formation and resorption occurred preferentially near very high (>95th percentile) versus low (<5th percentile) strain magnitude and gradient elements, and very low strain elements were more likely to be near resorption than formation (p<0.05). In the cortical compartment, strain gradient was higher near formation versus resorption (p<0.05), and both formation and resorption occurred preferentially near very high versus low strain gradient elements (p<0.05). At most, 54% of very high and low strain elements were near formation or resorption only, and similar trends were observed in the control and load groups. These findings suggest that strain, likely in combination with other physiological factors, influences adaptation under normal loads and in response to a novel loading intervention, and represents an important step toward defining exercise interventions to maximize bone strength.

bioengineering↗

Intrinsic and Modifiable Contributors to Distal Radius Microstructure, Macrostructure and Strength in Premenopausal Women

While weight-bearing and resistive exercise modestly increases aBMD, the precise relationship between physical activity and bone microstructure, and strain in humans is not known. Previously, we established a voluntary upper-extremity loading model that assigns a persons target force based on their subject-specific, continuum FE-estimated radius bone strain. Here, our purpose was to quantify the inter-individual variability in radius microstructure and FE-estimated strain explained by site-specific mechanical loading history, and to determine whether variability in strain is captured by aBMD, a clinically relevant measure of bone density and fracture risk. Seventy-two women aged 21-40 were included in this cross-sectional analysis. High resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) was used to measure macro- and micro-structure in the distal radius. Mean energy equivalent strain in the distal radius was calculated from continuum finite element models generated from clinical resolution CT images of the forearm. Areal BMD was used in a nonlinear regression model to predict FE strain. Hierarchical linear regression models were used to assess the predictive capability of intrinsic (age, height) and modifiable (body mass, grip strength, physical activity) predictors. Fifty-one percent of the variability in FE bone strain was explained by its relationship with aBMD, with higher density predicting lower strains. Age and height explained up to 31.6% of the variance in microstructural parameters. Body mass explained 9.1% and 10.0% of the variance in aBMD and bone strain, respectively, with higher body mass indicative of greater density. Overall, results suggest that meaningful differences in bone structure and strain can be predicted by subject characteristics.\n\nHighlightsO_LIAreal bone mineral density (aBMD) explains 51% of the variability in bone strain.\nC_LIO_LIAdult bone loading predicts greater cortical porosity and trabecular density.\nC_LIO_LIGreater body mass predicts greater aBMD and lower bone strain.\nC_LI

physiology↗